Cargando…

Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields

It is widely accepted that a redundant independent dose calculation (RIDC) must be included in any treatment planning verification procedure. Specifically, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique implies a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program in which RIDC should be included. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata, Berna, Alfredo Serna, Puchades, Vicente Puchades, Amores, David Ramos, Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525309
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.144485
_version_ 1782347915523522560
author Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
Berna, Alfredo Serna
Puchades, Vicente Puchades
Amores, David Ramos
Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
author_facet Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
Berna, Alfredo Serna
Puchades, Vicente Puchades
Amores, David Ramos
Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
author_sort Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
collection PubMed
description It is widely accepted that a redundant independent dose calculation (RIDC) must be included in any treatment planning verification procedure. Specifically, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique implies a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program in which RIDC should be included. In this paper, the results obtained in 1 year of clinical experience are presented. Eclipse from Varian is the treatment planning system (TPS), here in use. RIDC were performed with the commercial software; Diamond(®) (PTW) which is capable of calculating VMAT fields. Once the plan is clinically accepted, it is exported via Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) to RIDC, together with the body contour, and then a point dose calculation is performed, usually at the isocenter. A total of 459 plans were evaluated. The total average deviation was -0.3 ± 1.8% (one standard deviation (1SD)). For higher clearance the plans were grouped by location in: Prostate, pelvis, abdomen, chest, head and neck, brain, stereotactic radiosurgery, lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, and miscellaneous. The highest absolute deviation was -0.8 ± 1.5% corresponding to the prostate. A linear fit between doses calculated by RIDC and by TPS produced a correlation coefficient of 0.9991 and a slope of 1.0023. These results are very close to those obtained in the validation process. This agreement led us to consider this RIDC software as a valuable tool for QA in VMAT plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4258729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42587292014-12-18 Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata Berna, Alfredo Serna Puchades, Vicente Puchades Amores, David Ramos Baños, Miguel Alcaraz J Med Phys Original Article It is widely accepted that a redundant independent dose calculation (RIDC) must be included in any treatment planning verification procedure. Specifically, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique implies a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program in which RIDC should be included. In this paper, the results obtained in 1 year of clinical experience are presented. Eclipse from Varian is the treatment planning system (TPS), here in use. RIDC were performed with the commercial software; Diamond(®) (PTW) which is capable of calculating VMAT fields. Once the plan is clinically accepted, it is exported via Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) to RIDC, together with the body contour, and then a point dose calculation is performed, usually at the isocenter. A total of 459 plans were evaluated. The total average deviation was -0.3 ± 1.8% (one standard deviation (1SD)). For higher clearance the plans were grouped by location in: Prostate, pelvis, abdomen, chest, head and neck, brain, stereotactic radiosurgery, lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, and miscellaneous. The highest absolute deviation was -0.8 ± 1.5% corresponding to the prostate. A linear fit between doses calculated by RIDC and by TPS produced a correlation coefficient of 0.9991 and a slope of 1.0023. These results are very close to those obtained in the validation process. This agreement led us to consider this RIDC software as a valuable tool for QA in VMAT plans. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4258729/ /pubmed/25525309 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.144485 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
Berna, Alfredo Serna
Puchades, Vicente Puchades
Amores, David Ramos
Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields
title Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields
title_full Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields
title_fullStr Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields
title_full_unstemmed Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields
title_short Results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for VMAT fields
title_sort results of 1 year of clinical experience with independent dose calculation software for vmat fields
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525309
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.144485
work_keys_str_mv AT colodrojuanfernandomata resultsof1yearofclinicalexperiencewithindependentdosecalculationsoftwareforvmatfields
AT bernaalfredoserna resultsof1yearofclinicalexperiencewithindependentdosecalculationsoftwareforvmatfields
AT puchadesvicentepuchades resultsof1yearofclinicalexperiencewithindependentdosecalculationsoftwareforvmatfields
AT amoresdavidramos resultsof1yearofclinicalexperiencewithindependentdosecalculationsoftwareforvmatfields
AT banosmiguelalcaraz resultsof1yearofclinicalexperiencewithindependentdosecalculationsoftwareforvmatfields