Cargando…

A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences

BACKGROUND: Over the past ten years, there has been an explosion of microbiome research. Many software packages for analyzing microbial sequences such as the 16S gene from 454 sequencers and Illumina platforms are available. But for a new researcher, it is difficult to know which package to choose....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilakanta, Haema, Drews, Kimberly L, Firrell, Suzanne, Foulkes, Mary A, Jablonski, Kathleen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-830
_version_ 1782347919720972288
author Nilakanta, Haema
Drews, Kimberly L
Firrell, Suzanne
Foulkes, Mary A
Jablonski, Kathleen A
author_facet Nilakanta, Haema
Drews, Kimberly L
Firrell, Suzanne
Foulkes, Mary A
Jablonski, Kathleen A
author_sort Nilakanta, Haema
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past ten years, there has been an explosion of microbiome research. Many software packages for analyzing microbial sequences such as the 16S gene from 454 sequencers and Illumina platforms are available. But for a new researcher, it is difficult to know which package to choose. We present a systematic review of packages for the analysis of molecular sequences used to describe and compare microbial communities. This review gives students and researchers information to help choose the best analytic pipeline for their project. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review of such software. FINDINGS: Seven software packages met our inclusion criteria of being cost free and publically available, offering analysis functions from platform sequencing to results presentation, and included documentation and data security. We installed and executed each of the software packages and describe the installation, documentation, features, and functions of each. CONCLUSIONS: For the user, pipeline choices may be limited because some packages only run on select operating systems. Users should be aware of the availability of features and functions of each package. Of utmost importance is that the user must be aware of the default settings and underlying assumptions of each function. All packages are lacking sufficient methods for longitudinal analysis. Researchers can do well using any one of these seven packages. However, two packages are outstanding; mothur and QIIME, due not only to the comprehensive suite of functions and procedures incorporated into the pipelines but also because of the accompanying documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4258797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42587972014-12-09 A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences Nilakanta, Haema Drews, Kimberly L Firrell, Suzanne Foulkes, Mary A Jablonski, Kathleen A BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Over the past ten years, there has been an explosion of microbiome research. Many software packages for analyzing microbial sequences such as the 16S gene from 454 sequencers and Illumina platforms are available. But for a new researcher, it is difficult to know which package to choose. We present a systematic review of packages for the analysis of molecular sequences used to describe and compare microbial communities. This review gives students and researchers information to help choose the best analytic pipeline for their project. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review of such software. FINDINGS: Seven software packages met our inclusion criteria of being cost free and publically available, offering analysis functions from platform sequencing to results presentation, and included documentation and data security. We installed and executed each of the software packages and describe the installation, documentation, features, and functions of each. CONCLUSIONS: For the user, pipeline choices may be limited because some packages only run on select operating systems. Users should be aware of the availability of features and functions of each package. Of utmost importance is that the user must be aware of the default settings and underlying assumptions of each function. All packages are lacking sufficient methods for longitudinal analysis. Researchers can do well using any one of these seven packages. However, two packages are outstanding; mothur and QIIME, due not only to the comprehensive suite of functions and procedures incorporated into the pipelines but also because of the accompanying documentation. BioMed Central 2014-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4258797/ /pubmed/25421430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-830 Text en © Nilakanta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Nilakanta, Haema
Drews, Kimberly L
Firrell, Suzanne
Foulkes, Mary A
Jablonski, Kathleen A
A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
title A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
title_full A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
title_fullStr A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
title_full_unstemmed A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
title_short A review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
title_sort review of software for analyzing molecular sequences
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-830
work_keys_str_mv AT nilakantahaema areviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT drewskimberlyl areviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT firrellsuzanne areviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT foulkesmarya areviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT jablonskikathleena areviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT nilakantahaema reviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT drewskimberlyl reviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT firrellsuzanne reviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT foulkesmarya reviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences
AT jablonskikathleena reviewofsoftwareforanalyzingmolecularsequences