Cargando…

Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation

Background: Accurate brain tissue segmentation from magnetic resonance (MR) images is an important step in analysis of cerebral images. There are software packages which are used for brain segmentation. These packages usually contain a set of skull stripping, intensity non-uniformity (bias) correcti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazemi, K, Noorizadeh, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505764
_version_ 1782347926207463424
author Kazemi, K
Noorizadeh, N
author_facet Kazemi, K
Noorizadeh, N
author_sort Kazemi, K
collection PubMed
description Background: Accurate brain tissue segmentation from magnetic resonance (MR) images is an important step in analysis of cerebral images. There are software packages which are used for brain segmentation. These packages usually contain a set of skull stripping, intensity non-uniformity (bias) correction and segmentation routines. Thus, assessment of the quality of the segmented gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is needed for the neuroimaging applications. Methods: In this paper, performance evaluation of three widely used brain segmentation software packages SPM8, FSL and Brainsuite is presented. Segmentation with SPM8 has been performed in three frameworks: i) default segmentation, ii) SPM8 New-segmentation and iii) modified version using hidden Markov random field as implemented in SPM8-VBM toolbox. Results: The accuracy of the segmented GM, WM and CSF and the robustness of the tools against changes of image quality has been assessed using Brainweb simulated MR images and IBSR real MR images. The calculated similarity between the segmented tissues using different tools and corresponding ground truth shows variations in segmentation results. Conclusion: A few studies has investigated GM, WM and CSF segmentation. In these studies, the skull stripping and bias correction are performed separately and they just evaluated the segmentation. Thus, in this study, assessment of complete segmentation framework consisting of pre-processing and segmentation of these packages is performed. The obtained results can assist the users in choosing an appropriate segmentation software package for the neuroimaging application of interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4258855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42588552014-12-10 Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation Kazemi, K Noorizadeh, N J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article Background: Accurate brain tissue segmentation from magnetic resonance (MR) images is an important step in analysis of cerebral images. There are software packages which are used for brain segmentation. These packages usually contain a set of skull stripping, intensity non-uniformity (bias) correction and segmentation routines. Thus, assessment of the quality of the segmented gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is needed for the neuroimaging applications. Methods: In this paper, performance evaluation of three widely used brain segmentation software packages SPM8, FSL and Brainsuite is presented. Segmentation with SPM8 has been performed in three frameworks: i) default segmentation, ii) SPM8 New-segmentation and iii) modified version using hidden Markov random field as implemented in SPM8-VBM toolbox. Results: The accuracy of the segmented GM, WM and CSF and the robustness of the tools against changes of image quality has been assessed using Brainweb simulated MR images and IBSR real MR images. The calculated similarity between the segmented tissues using different tools and corresponding ground truth shows variations in segmentation results. Conclusion: A few studies has investigated GM, WM and CSF segmentation. In these studies, the skull stripping and bias correction are performed separately and they just evaluated the segmentation. Thus, in this study, assessment of complete segmentation framework consisting of pre-processing and segmentation of these packages is performed. The obtained results can assist the users in choosing an appropriate segmentation software package for the neuroimaging application of interest. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4258855/ /pubmed/25505764 Text en © 2014: Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/deed.en_US), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kazemi, K
Noorizadeh, N
Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation
title Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation
title_full Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation
title_short Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation
title_sort quantitative comparison of spm, fsl, and brainsuite for brain mr image segmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505764
work_keys_str_mv AT kazemik quantitativecomparisonofspmfslandbrainsuiteforbrainmrimagesegmentation
AT noorizadehn quantitativecomparisonofspmfslandbrainsuiteforbrainmrimagesegmentation