Cargando…

Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment

Background: The accuracy and reproducibility of medical skills assessment is generally low. Rater training has little or no effect. Our knowledge in this field, however, relies on studies involving video ratings of overall clinical performances. We hypothesised that a rater training focussing on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weitz, Gunther, Vinzentius, Christian, Twesten, Christoph, Lehnert, Hendrik, Bonnemeier, Hendrik, König, Inke R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4259060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000933
_version_ 1782347960924766208
author Weitz, Gunther
Vinzentius, Christian
Twesten, Christoph
Lehnert, Hendrik
Bonnemeier, Hendrik
König, Inke R.
author_facet Weitz, Gunther
Vinzentius, Christian
Twesten, Christoph
Lehnert, Hendrik
Bonnemeier, Hendrik
König, Inke R.
author_sort Weitz, Gunther
collection PubMed
description Background: The accuracy and reproducibility of medical skills assessment is generally low. Rater training has little or no effect. Our knowledge in this field, however, relies on studies involving video ratings of overall clinical performances. We hypothesised that a rater training focussing on the frame of reference could improve accuracy in grading the curricular assessment of a highly standardised physical head-to-toe examination. Methods: Twenty-one raters assessed the performance of 242 third-year medical students. Eleven raters had been randomly assigned to undergo a brief frame-of-reference training a few days before the assessment. 218 encounters were successfully recorded on video and re-assessed independently by three additional observers. Accuracy was defined as the concordance between the raters' grade and the median of the observers' grade. After the assessment, both students and raters filled in a questionnaire about their views on the assessment. Results: Rater training did not have a measurable influence on accuracy. However, trained raters rated significantly more stringently than untrained raters, and their overall stringency was closer to the stringency of the observers. The questionnaire indicated a higher awareness of the halo effect in the trained raters group. Although the self-assessment of the students mirrored the assessment of the raters in both groups, the students assessed by trained raters felt more discontent with their grade. Conclusions: While training had some marginal effects, it failed to have an impact on the individual accuracy. These results in real-life encounters are consistent with previous studies on rater training using video assessments of clinical performances. The high degree of standardisation in this study was not suitable to harmonize the trained raters’ grading. The data support the notion that the process of appraising medical performance is highly individual. A frame-of-reference training as applied does not effectively adjust the physicians' judgement on medical students in real-live assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4259060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42590602014-12-08 Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment Weitz, Gunther Vinzentius, Christian Twesten, Christoph Lehnert, Hendrik Bonnemeier, Hendrik König, Inke R. GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Background: The accuracy and reproducibility of medical skills assessment is generally low. Rater training has little or no effect. Our knowledge in this field, however, relies on studies involving video ratings of overall clinical performances. We hypothesised that a rater training focussing on the frame of reference could improve accuracy in grading the curricular assessment of a highly standardised physical head-to-toe examination. Methods: Twenty-one raters assessed the performance of 242 third-year medical students. Eleven raters had been randomly assigned to undergo a brief frame-of-reference training a few days before the assessment. 218 encounters were successfully recorded on video and re-assessed independently by three additional observers. Accuracy was defined as the concordance between the raters' grade and the median of the observers' grade. After the assessment, both students and raters filled in a questionnaire about their views on the assessment. Results: Rater training did not have a measurable influence on accuracy. However, trained raters rated significantly more stringently than untrained raters, and their overall stringency was closer to the stringency of the observers. The questionnaire indicated a higher awareness of the halo effect in the trained raters group. Although the self-assessment of the students mirrored the assessment of the raters in both groups, the students assessed by trained raters felt more discontent with their grade. Conclusions: While training had some marginal effects, it failed to have an impact on the individual accuracy. These results in real-life encounters are consistent with previous studies on rater training using video assessments of clinical performances. The high degree of standardisation in this study was not suitable to harmonize the trained raters’ grading. The data support the notion that the process of appraising medical performance is highly individual. A frame-of-reference training as applied does not effectively adjust the physicians' judgement on medical students in real-live assessments. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4259060/ /pubmed/25489341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000933 Text en Copyright © 2014 Weitz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Weitz, Gunther
Vinzentius, Christian
Twesten, Christoph
Lehnert, Hendrik
Bonnemeier, Hendrik
König, Inke R.
Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
title Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
title_full Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
title_fullStr Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
title_short Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
title_sort effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4259060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000933
work_keys_str_mv AT weitzgunther effectsofaratertrainingonratingaccuracyinaphysicalexaminationskillsassessment
AT vinzentiuschristian effectsofaratertrainingonratingaccuracyinaphysicalexaminationskillsassessment
AT twestenchristoph effectsofaratertrainingonratingaccuracyinaphysicalexaminationskillsassessment
AT lehnerthendrik effectsofaratertrainingonratingaccuracyinaphysicalexaminationskillsassessment
AT bonnemeierhendrik effectsofaratertrainingonratingaccuracyinaphysicalexaminationskillsassessment
AT koniginker effectsofaratertrainingonratingaccuracyinaphysicalexaminationskillsassessment