Cargando…

Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND: The importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vooijs, Martijn, Alpay, Laurence L, Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B, Beerthuizen, Thijs, Siemonsma, Petra C, Abbink, Jannie J, Sont, Jacob K, Rövekamp, Ton A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4259960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25347989
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3056
_version_ 1782348096472088576
author Vooijs, Martijn
Alpay, Laurence L
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B
Beerthuizen, Thijs
Siemonsma, Petra C
Abbink, Jannie J
Sont, Jacob K
Rövekamp, Ton A
author_facet Vooijs, Martijn
Alpay, Laurence L
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B
Beerthuizen, Thijs
Siemonsma, Petra C
Abbink, Jannie J
Sont, Jacob K
Rövekamp, Ton A
author_sort Vooijs, Martijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients’ preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity. METHODS: To assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device RESULTS: The agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good (r=.77) and moderate (r=.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices. CONCLUSIONS: The low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4259960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42599602014-12-09 Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Vooijs, Martijn Alpay, Laurence L Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B Beerthuizen, Thijs Siemonsma, Petra C Abbink, Jannie J Sont, Jacob K Rövekamp, Ton A Interact J Med Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients’ preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity. METHODS: To assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device RESULTS: The agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good (r=.77) and moderate (r=.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices. CONCLUSIONS: The low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4259960/ /pubmed/25347989 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3056 Text en ©Martijn Vooijs, Laurence L. Alpay, Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband, Thijs Beerthuizen, Petra C. Siemonsma, Jannie J. Abbink, Jacob K. Sont, Ton A. Rövekamp. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 27.10.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Vooijs, Martijn
Alpay, Laurence L
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B
Beerthuizen, Thijs
Siemonsma, Petra C
Abbink, Jannie J
Sont, Jacob K
Rövekamp, Ton A
Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_fullStr Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_short Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_sort validity and usability of low-cost accelerometers for internet-based self-monitoring of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4259960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25347989
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3056
work_keys_str_mv AT vooijsmartijn validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT alpaylaurencel validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT snoeckstrobandjiskab validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT beerthuizenthijs validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT siemonsmapetrac validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT abbinkjanniej validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT sontjacobk validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT rovekamptona validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease