Cargando…
Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy site infection can cause numerous problems. Absorbent foam dressing may be able to prevent proliferation of infectious microorganisms by absorbing the tracheostomy stoma exudate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of absorbent foam with gauze dressing for prevention of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506371 |
_version_ | 1782348115132547072 |
---|---|
author | Ahmadinegad, Mehdi Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza Ghahreman, Minoo Shabani, Mohammad Mokhtare, Mahsa Ahmadipour, Maryam |
author_facet | Ahmadinegad, Mehdi Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza Ghahreman, Minoo Shabani, Mohammad Mokhtare, Mahsa Ahmadipour, Maryam |
author_sort | Ahmadinegad, Mehdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy site infection can cause numerous problems. Absorbent foam dressing may be able to prevent proliferation of infectious microorganisms by absorbing the tracheostomy stoma exudate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of absorbent foam with gauze dressing for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 80 patients (18 to 60 years) hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to severe head injury were randomly divided into two groups and early tracheostomy was done for them during the first 2 days. In the first group, gauze was used as tracheostomy site dressing, while in the second, absorbent foam, was placed. Tracheostomy site was checked daily for any sign of infection and samples were taken from the stoma for culture in case of presence of any sign of infection. RESULTS: Of a total of 80, 11 had tracheostomy site infection (13.75%), including 7 (17.5%) in the gauze group and 4 (10%) in the foam group. The difference in this regard between the two groups was not significant (P=0.051). Also, the dominant strains in the culture of gauze group were hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacteria (particularly Acinetobacter), while in the foam group, Gram-positives and more commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis were found. CONCLUSION: Absorbent foam dressing is not superior to gauze dressings for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4260068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42600682014-12-12 Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection Ahmadinegad, Mehdi Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza Ghahreman, Minoo Shabani, Mohammad Mokhtare, Mahsa Ahmadipour, Maryam Tanaffos Original Article BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy site infection can cause numerous problems. Absorbent foam dressing may be able to prevent proliferation of infectious microorganisms by absorbing the tracheostomy stoma exudate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of absorbent foam with gauze dressing for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 80 patients (18 to 60 years) hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to severe head injury were randomly divided into two groups and early tracheostomy was done for them during the first 2 days. In the first group, gauze was used as tracheostomy site dressing, while in the second, absorbent foam, was placed. Tracheostomy site was checked daily for any sign of infection and samples were taken from the stoma for culture in case of presence of any sign of infection. RESULTS: Of a total of 80, 11 had tracheostomy site infection (13.75%), including 7 (17.5%) in the gauze group and 4 (10%) in the foam group. The difference in this regard between the two groups was not significant (P=0.051). Also, the dominant strains in the culture of gauze group were hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacteria (particularly Acinetobacter), while in the foam group, Gram-positives and more commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis were found. CONCLUSION: Absorbent foam dressing is not superior to gauze dressings for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4260068/ /pubmed/25506371 Text en Copyright © 2014 National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ahmadinegad, Mehdi Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza Ghahreman, Minoo Shabani, Mohammad Mokhtare, Mahsa Ahmadipour, Maryam Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection |
title | Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection |
title_full | Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection |
title_short | Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection |
title_sort | efficacy of dressing with absorbent foam versus dressing with gauze in prevention of tracheostomy site infection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadinegadmehdi efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection AT lashkarizadehmohammadreza efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection AT ghahremanminoo efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection AT shabanimohammad efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection AT mokhtaremahsa efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection AT ahmadipourmaryam efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection |