Cargando…

Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy site infection can cause numerous problems. Absorbent foam dressing may be able to prevent proliferation of infectious microorganisms by absorbing the tracheostomy stoma exudate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of absorbent foam with gauze dressing for prevention of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadinegad, Mehdi, Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza, Ghahreman, Minoo, Shabani, Mohammad, Mokhtare, Mahsa, Ahmadipour, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506371
_version_ 1782348115132547072
author Ahmadinegad, Mehdi
Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza
Ghahreman, Minoo
Shabani, Mohammad
Mokhtare, Mahsa
Ahmadipour, Maryam
author_facet Ahmadinegad, Mehdi
Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza
Ghahreman, Minoo
Shabani, Mohammad
Mokhtare, Mahsa
Ahmadipour, Maryam
author_sort Ahmadinegad, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy site infection can cause numerous problems. Absorbent foam dressing may be able to prevent proliferation of infectious microorganisms by absorbing the tracheostomy stoma exudate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of absorbent foam with gauze dressing for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 80 patients (18 to 60 years) hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to severe head injury were randomly divided into two groups and early tracheostomy was done for them during the first 2 days. In the first group, gauze was used as tracheostomy site dressing, while in the second, absorbent foam, was placed. Tracheostomy site was checked daily for any sign of infection and samples were taken from the stoma for culture in case of presence of any sign of infection. RESULTS: Of a total of 80, 11 had tracheostomy site infection (13.75%), including 7 (17.5%) in the gauze group and 4 (10%) in the foam group. The difference in this regard between the two groups was not significant (P=0.051). Also, the dominant strains in the culture of gauze group were hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacteria (particularly Acinetobacter), while in the foam group, Gram-positives and more commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis were found. CONCLUSION: Absorbent foam dressing is not superior to gauze dressings for prevention of tracheostomy site infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4260068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42600682014-12-12 Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection Ahmadinegad, Mehdi Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza Ghahreman, Minoo Shabani, Mohammad Mokhtare, Mahsa Ahmadipour, Maryam Tanaffos Original Article BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy site infection can cause numerous problems. Absorbent foam dressing may be able to prevent proliferation of infectious microorganisms by absorbing the tracheostomy stoma exudate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of absorbent foam with gauze dressing for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 80 patients (18 to 60 years) hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to severe head injury were randomly divided into two groups and early tracheostomy was done for them during the first 2 days. In the first group, gauze was used as tracheostomy site dressing, while in the second, absorbent foam, was placed. Tracheostomy site was checked daily for any sign of infection and samples were taken from the stoma for culture in case of presence of any sign of infection. RESULTS: Of a total of 80, 11 had tracheostomy site infection (13.75%), including 7 (17.5%) in the gauze group and 4 (10%) in the foam group. The difference in this regard between the two groups was not significant (P=0.051). Also, the dominant strains in the culture of gauze group were hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacteria (particularly Acinetobacter), while in the foam group, Gram-positives and more commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis were found. CONCLUSION: Absorbent foam dressing is not superior to gauze dressings for prevention of tracheostomy site infection. National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4260068/ /pubmed/25506371 Text en Copyright © 2014 National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmadinegad, Mehdi
Lashkarizadeh, Mohammad Reza
Ghahreman, Minoo
Shabani, Mohammad
Mokhtare, Mahsa
Ahmadipour, Maryam
Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
title Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
title_full Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
title_fullStr Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
title_short Efficacy of Dressing with Absorbent Foam versus Dressing with Gauze in Prevention of Tracheostomy Site Infection
title_sort efficacy of dressing with absorbent foam versus dressing with gauze in prevention of tracheostomy site infection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506371
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadinegadmehdi efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection
AT lashkarizadehmohammadreza efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection
AT ghahremanminoo efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection
AT shabanimohammad efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection
AT mokhtaremahsa efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection
AT ahmadipourmaryam efficacyofdressingwithabsorbentfoamversusdressingwithgauzeinpreventionoftracheostomysiteinfection