Cargando…
Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks
BACKGROUND: Recruitment to research studies in primary care is challenging despite widespread implementation of electronic patient record (EPR) systems which potentially make it easier to identify eligible cases. METHODS: Literature review and applying the learning from a European research readiness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0169-6 |
_version_ | 1782348144105750528 |
---|---|
author | Carr, Helen de Lusignan, Simon Liyanage, Harshana Liaw, Siaw-Teng Terry, Amanda Rafi, Imran |
author_facet | Carr, Helen de Lusignan, Simon Liyanage, Harshana Liaw, Siaw-Teng Terry, Amanda Rafi, Imran |
author_sort | Carr, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruitment to research studies in primary care is challenging despite widespread implementation of electronic patient record (EPR) systems which potentially make it easier to identify eligible cases. METHODS: Literature review and applying the learning from a European research readiness assessment tool, the TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness instrument (TIRRE), to the context of the English NHS in order to develop a model to assess a practice’s research readiness. RESULTS: Seven dimensions of research readiness were identified: (1) Data readiness: Is there good data quality in EPR systems; (2) Record readiness: Are EPR data able to identify eligible cases and other study data; (3) Organisational readiness: Are the health system and socio-cultural environment supportive; (4) Governance readiness: Does the study meet legal and local health system regulatory compliance; (5) Study-specific readiness; (6) Business process readiness: Are business processes tilted in favour of participation: including capacity and capability to take on extra work, financial incentives as well as intangibles such as social and intellectual capital; (7) Patient readiness: Are systems in place to recruit patients and obtain informed consent? CONCLUSIONS: The model might enable the development of interventions to increase participation in primary care-based research and become a tool to measure the progress of practice networks towards the most advanced state of readiness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4260213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42602132014-12-09 Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks Carr, Helen de Lusignan, Simon Liyanage, Harshana Liaw, Siaw-Teng Terry, Amanda Rafi, Imran BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruitment to research studies in primary care is challenging despite widespread implementation of electronic patient record (EPR) systems which potentially make it easier to identify eligible cases. METHODS: Literature review and applying the learning from a European research readiness assessment tool, the TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness instrument (TIRRE), to the context of the English NHS in order to develop a model to assess a practice’s research readiness. RESULTS: Seven dimensions of research readiness were identified: (1) Data readiness: Is there good data quality in EPR systems; (2) Record readiness: Are EPR data able to identify eligible cases and other study data; (3) Organisational readiness: Are the health system and socio-cultural environment supportive; (4) Governance readiness: Does the study meet legal and local health system regulatory compliance; (5) Study-specific readiness; (6) Business process readiness: Are business processes tilted in favour of participation: including capacity and capability to take on extra work, financial incentives as well as intangibles such as social and intellectual capital; (7) Patient readiness: Are systems in place to recruit patients and obtain informed consent? CONCLUSIONS: The model might enable the development of interventions to increase participation in primary care-based research and become a tool to measure the progress of practice networks towards the most advanced state of readiness. BioMed Central 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4260213/ /pubmed/25425143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0169-6 Text en © Carr et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Carr, Helen de Lusignan, Simon Liyanage, Harshana Liaw, Siaw-Teng Terry, Amanda Rafi, Imran Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
title | Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
title_full | Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
title_fullStr | Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
title_short | Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
title_sort | defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0169-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrhelen definingdimensionsofresearchreadinessaconceptualmodelforprimarycareresearchnetworks AT delusignansimon definingdimensionsofresearchreadinessaconceptualmodelforprimarycareresearchnetworks AT liyanageharshana definingdimensionsofresearchreadinessaconceptualmodelforprimarycareresearchnetworks AT liawsiawteng definingdimensionsofresearchreadinessaconceptualmodelforprimarycareresearchnetworks AT terryamanda definingdimensionsofresearchreadinessaconceptualmodelforprimarycareresearchnetworks AT rafiimran definingdimensionsofresearchreadinessaconceptualmodelforprimarycareresearchnetworks |