Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common yet difficult to treat condition in primary care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based fatigue self-management (FSM) intervention as compared to usual care among patients with chronic fat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Hongdao, Friedberg, Fred, Castora-Binkley, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0184-7
_version_ 1782348150166519808
author Meng, Hongdao
Friedberg, Fred
Castora-Binkley, Melissa
author_facet Meng, Hongdao
Friedberg, Fred
Castora-Binkley, Melissa
author_sort Meng, Hongdao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common yet difficult to treat condition in primary care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based fatigue self-management (FSM) intervention as compared to usual care among patients with chronic fatigue in primary care. METHODS: An economic evaluation alongside of a parallel randomized controlled study design was used. Computer-generated variable-sized block randomization plan was used to assign patients into treatment groups and data collection staff were blinded to group assignments. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with at least six months of persistent fatigue and no medical or psychiatric exclusions were enrolled from a large primary care practice in Stony Brook, New York. The FSM group (n = 37) received two sessions of a nurse-delivered, fatigue self-management protocol and a self-help book and the usual care group (n = 36) received regular medical care. The effectiveness measure was the Fatigue Severity Scale and the cost measure was total health care expenditures derived from monthly health services use diaries during follow-up. A societal perspective was adopted and bootstrapped incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefit (NMB) were calculated as measures of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICER for FSM was -$$2358, indicating that FSM dominates UC and it may generate societal cost savings as compared to usual care. Complete case analysis yielded smaller ICER (−$1199) with greater uncertainties. Net monetary benefit analysis showed that FSM has a probability of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.819, 0.847) to achieve positive NMB and the favorable results were not sensitive to assumptions about informal care or treatment costs. CONCLUSION: This economic evaluation found initial evidence that a two-session brief CBT-based FSM may be cost-effective as compared to usual care over 12 months. The FSM intervention is potentially a promising intervention for chronic fatigue patients in primary care. Additional research is needed to examine the reproducibility and generalizability of these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00997451, March 28, 2009).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4260238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42602382014-12-09 Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial Meng, Hongdao Friedberg, Fred Castora-Binkley, Melissa BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common yet difficult to treat condition in primary care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based fatigue self-management (FSM) intervention as compared to usual care among patients with chronic fatigue in primary care. METHODS: An economic evaluation alongside of a parallel randomized controlled study design was used. Computer-generated variable-sized block randomization plan was used to assign patients into treatment groups and data collection staff were blinded to group assignments. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with at least six months of persistent fatigue and no medical or psychiatric exclusions were enrolled from a large primary care practice in Stony Brook, New York. The FSM group (n = 37) received two sessions of a nurse-delivered, fatigue self-management protocol and a self-help book and the usual care group (n = 36) received regular medical care. The effectiveness measure was the Fatigue Severity Scale and the cost measure was total health care expenditures derived from monthly health services use diaries during follow-up. A societal perspective was adopted and bootstrapped incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefit (NMB) were calculated as measures of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The ICER for FSM was -$$2358, indicating that FSM dominates UC and it may generate societal cost savings as compared to usual care. Complete case analysis yielded smaller ICER (−$1199) with greater uncertainties. Net monetary benefit analysis showed that FSM has a probability of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.819, 0.847) to achieve positive NMB and the favorable results were not sensitive to assumptions about informal care or treatment costs. CONCLUSION: This economic evaluation found initial evidence that a two-session brief CBT-based FSM may be cost-effective as compared to usual care over 12 months. The FSM intervention is potentially a promising intervention for chronic fatigue patients in primary care. Additional research is needed to examine the reproducibility and generalizability of these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00997451, March 28, 2009). BioMed Central 2014-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4260238/ /pubmed/25421363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0184-7 Text en © Meng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meng, Hongdao
Friedberg, Fred
Castora-Binkley, Melissa
Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0184-7
work_keys_str_mv AT menghongdao costeffectivenessofchronicfatigueselfmanagementversususualcareapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT friedbergfred costeffectivenessofchronicfatigueselfmanagementversususualcareapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT castorabinkleymelissa costeffectivenessofchronicfatigueselfmanagementversususualcareapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial