Cargando…

Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations

Fairness violations elicit powerful behavioral and affective responses. Indeed, people are willing to incur costs to sanction unfair behavior. Here we study the possible impact of long-term mental training in socio-affective capacities such as compassion on altruistic punishment and compensatory beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCall, Cade, Steinbeis, Nikolaus, Ricard, Matthieu, Singer, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00424
_version_ 1782348194387066880
author McCall, Cade
Steinbeis, Nikolaus
Ricard, Matthieu
Singer, Tania
author_facet McCall, Cade
Steinbeis, Nikolaus
Ricard, Matthieu
Singer, Tania
author_sort McCall, Cade
collection PubMed
description Fairness violations elicit powerful behavioral and affective responses. Indeed, people are willing to incur costs to sanction unfair behavior. Here we study the possible impact of long-term mental training in socio-affective capacities such as compassion on altruistic punishment and compensatory behavior in economic games. To this end we recruited a group of long-term meditation practitioners (LTPs) who had engaged in an average of 40 K h of mental training exercises including compassion-related meditation, along with a group of meditation-naïve controls. Participants played several adaptations of the dictator game in which they had the opportunity to punish the dictator both when they were the recipients of the dictator's offer and when they were third-party witnesses to the dictator's treatment of an anonymous second player. Compared to controls, LTPs were less likely to punish when they were the victims of fairness violations. However, both groups punished equivalently when they witnessed others receiving unfair treatment. In post-task questionnaires, controls reported significantly more anger in response to unfair offers than LTPs, although fairness judgments did not differ between groups. These data suggest that because the LTPs were less angered by unfair treatment of themselves, they punished that behavior less. However, when they witnessed the unfair treatment of others, they engaged in norm-reinforcing punishment. Finally, when participants played an additional game which included the opportunity to recompense victims, LTPs were more likely to do so. Together these data point to differential approaches to justice whereby LTPs engaged less in vengeful, retributive justice and focused more on norm reinforcement and the restoration of equity. These differences suggest that social preferences are plastic and that altruistic responses to unfairness may be shaped by the prolonged cultivation of prosocial motivation, altruism, and compassion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4260514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42605142014-12-23 Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations McCall, Cade Steinbeis, Nikolaus Ricard, Matthieu Singer, Tania Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Fairness violations elicit powerful behavioral and affective responses. Indeed, people are willing to incur costs to sanction unfair behavior. Here we study the possible impact of long-term mental training in socio-affective capacities such as compassion on altruistic punishment and compensatory behavior in economic games. To this end we recruited a group of long-term meditation practitioners (LTPs) who had engaged in an average of 40 K h of mental training exercises including compassion-related meditation, along with a group of meditation-naïve controls. Participants played several adaptations of the dictator game in which they had the opportunity to punish the dictator both when they were the recipients of the dictator's offer and when they were third-party witnesses to the dictator's treatment of an anonymous second player. Compared to controls, LTPs were less likely to punish when they were the victims of fairness violations. However, both groups punished equivalently when they witnessed others receiving unfair treatment. In post-task questionnaires, controls reported significantly more anger in response to unfair offers than LTPs, although fairness judgments did not differ between groups. These data suggest that because the LTPs were less angered by unfair treatment of themselves, they punished that behavior less. However, when they witnessed the unfair treatment of others, they engaged in norm-reinforcing punishment. Finally, when participants played an additional game which included the opportunity to recompense victims, LTPs were more likely to do so. Together these data point to differential approaches to justice whereby LTPs engaged less in vengeful, retributive justice and focused more on norm reinforcement and the restoration of equity. These differences suggest that social preferences are plastic and that altruistic responses to unfairness may be shaped by the prolonged cultivation of prosocial motivation, altruism, and compassion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4260514/ /pubmed/25538589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00424 Text en Copyright © 2014 McCall, Steinbeis, Ricard and Singer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
McCall, Cade
Steinbeis, Nikolaus
Ricard, Matthieu
Singer, Tania
Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
title Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
title_full Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
title_fullStr Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
title_full_unstemmed Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
title_short Compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
title_sort compassion meditators show less anger, less punishment, and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00424
work_keys_str_mv AT mccallcade compassionmeditatorsshowlessangerlesspunishmentandmorecompensationofvictimsinresponsetofairnessviolations
AT steinbeisnikolaus compassionmeditatorsshowlessangerlesspunishmentandmorecompensationofvictimsinresponsetofairnessviolations
AT ricardmatthieu compassionmeditatorsshowlessangerlesspunishmentandmorecompensationofvictimsinresponsetofairnessviolations
AT singertania compassionmeditatorsshowlessangerlesspunishmentandmorecompensationofvictimsinresponsetofairnessviolations