Cargando…

Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages

BACKGROUND: Bacteriophage treatment is a promising tool to reduce Campylobacter in chickens. Several studies have been published where group II or group III phages were successfully applied. However, these two groups of phages are different regarding their host ranges and host cell receptors. Theref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammerl, Jens A., Jäckel, Claudia, Alter, Thomas, Janzcyk, Pawel, Stingl, Kerstin, Knüver, Marie Theres, Hertwig, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25490713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114785
_version_ 1782348249957400576
author Hammerl, Jens A.
Jäckel, Claudia
Alter, Thomas
Janzcyk, Pawel
Stingl, Kerstin
Knüver, Marie Theres
Hertwig, Stefan
author_facet Hammerl, Jens A.
Jäckel, Claudia
Alter, Thomas
Janzcyk, Pawel
Stingl, Kerstin
Knüver, Marie Theres
Hertwig, Stefan
author_sort Hammerl, Jens A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacteriophage treatment is a promising tool to reduce Campylobacter in chickens. Several studies have been published where group II or group III phages were successfully applied. However, these two groups of phages are different regarding their host ranges and host cell receptors. Therefore, a concerted activity of group II and group III phages might enhance the efficacy of a treatment and decrease the number of resistant bacteria. RESULTS: In this study we have compared the lytic properties of some group II and group III phages and analysed the suitability of various phages for a reduction of C. jejuni in broiler chickens. We show that group II and group III phages exhibit different kinetics of infection. Two group III and one group II phage were selected for animal experiments and administered in different combinations to three groups of chickens, each containing ten birds. While group III phage CP14 alone reduced Campylobacter counts by more than 1 log(10) unit, the concomitant administration of a second group III phage (CP81) did not yield any reduction, probably due to the development of resistance induced by this phage. One group of chickens received phage CP14 and, 24 hours later, group II phage CP68. In this group of animals, Campylobacter counts were reduced by more than 3 log(10) units. CONCLUSION: The experiments illustrated that Campylobacter phage cocktails have to be carefully composed to achieve the best results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4260947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42609472014-12-15 Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages Hammerl, Jens A. Jäckel, Claudia Alter, Thomas Janzcyk, Pawel Stingl, Kerstin Knüver, Marie Theres Hertwig, Stefan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacteriophage treatment is a promising tool to reduce Campylobacter in chickens. Several studies have been published where group II or group III phages were successfully applied. However, these two groups of phages are different regarding their host ranges and host cell receptors. Therefore, a concerted activity of group II and group III phages might enhance the efficacy of a treatment and decrease the number of resistant bacteria. RESULTS: In this study we have compared the lytic properties of some group II and group III phages and analysed the suitability of various phages for a reduction of C. jejuni in broiler chickens. We show that group II and group III phages exhibit different kinetics of infection. Two group III and one group II phage were selected for animal experiments and administered in different combinations to three groups of chickens, each containing ten birds. While group III phage CP14 alone reduced Campylobacter counts by more than 1 log(10) unit, the concomitant administration of a second group III phage (CP81) did not yield any reduction, probably due to the development of resistance induced by this phage. One group of chickens received phage CP14 and, 24 hours later, group II phage CP68. In this group of animals, Campylobacter counts were reduced by more than 3 log(10) units. CONCLUSION: The experiments illustrated that Campylobacter phage cocktails have to be carefully composed to achieve the best results. Public Library of Science 2014-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4260947/ /pubmed/25490713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114785 Text en © 2014 Hammerl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hammerl, Jens A.
Jäckel, Claudia
Alter, Thomas
Janzcyk, Pawel
Stingl, Kerstin
Knüver, Marie Theres
Hertwig, Stefan
Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages
title Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages
title_full Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages
title_fullStr Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages
title_short Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chicken by Successive Application of Group II and Group III Phages
title_sort reduction of campylobacter jejuni in broiler chicken by successive application of group ii and group iii phages
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25490713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114785
work_keys_str_mv AT hammerljensa reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages
AT jackelclaudia reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages
AT alterthomas reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages
AT janzcykpawel reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages
AT stinglkerstin reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages
AT knuvermarietheres reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages
AT hertwigstefan reductionofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilerchickenbysuccessiveapplicationofgroupiiandgroupiiiphages