Cargando…

The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice

The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval in backward conditioning was assessed in mice. For one group of mice the presentation of food was signalled by a tone and for another group, food was unsignalled. For half of the mice, within each group, the presentation of food preceded a visual cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanderson, David J., Cuell, Steven F., Bannerman, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002
_version_ 1782348258706718720
author Sanderson, David J.
Cuell, Steven F.
Bannerman, David M.
author_facet Sanderson, David J.
Cuell, Steven F.
Bannerman, David M.
author_sort Sanderson, David J.
collection PubMed
description The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval in backward conditioning was assessed in mice. For one group of mice the presentation of food was signalled by a tone and for another group, food was unsignalled. For half of the mice, within each group, the presentation of food preceded a visual cue by 10 s. For the other half, food was presented at the start of the visual cue (0-s US–CS interval), resulting in simultaneous pairings of these events. A summation test and a subsequent retardation test were used to assess the inhibitory effects of backward conditioning in comparison to training with a non-reinforced visual cue that controlled for the possible effects of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition caused as a consequence of differential conditioning. In the summation test unsignalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition when the US–CS interval was 10 s, but not 0 s. Signalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition, independent of the US–CS interval. In the retardation test, independent of US signalling, a US–CS interval of 10 s failed to result in inhibition, but an interval of 0 s resulted in greater conditioned responding to the backward CS than the control CS. A generalisation decrement account of the effect of signalling the US with a 0-s US–CS interval, which resulted in reduced responding in the summation test and faster acquisition in the retardation test, is discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4261084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42610842014-12-13 The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice Sanderson, David J. Cuell, Steven F. Bannerman, David M. Learn Motiv Article The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval in backward conditioning was assessed in mice. For one group of mice the presentation of food was signalled by a tone and for another group, food was unsignalled. For half of the mice, within each group, the presentation of food preceded a visual cue by 10 s. For the other half, food was presented at the start of the visual cue (0-s US–CS interval), resulting in simultaneous pairings of these events. A summation test and a subsequent retardation test were used to assess the inhibitory effects of backward conditioning in comparison to training with a non-reinforced visual cue that controlled for the possible effects of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition caused as a consequence of differential conditioning. In the summation test unsignalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition when the US–CS interval was 10 s, but not 0 s. Signalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition, independent of the US–CS interval. In the retardation test, independent of US signalling, a US–CS interval of 10 s failed to result in inhibition, but an interval of 0 s resulted in greater conditioned responding to the backward CS than the control CS. A generalisation decrement account of the effect of signalling the US with a 0-s US–CS interval, which resulted in reduced responding in the summation test and faster acquisition in the retardation test, is discussed. Academic Press 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4261084/ /pubmed/25512678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002 Text en © 2014 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sanderson, David J.
Cuell, Steven F.
Bannerman, David M.
The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
title The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
title_full The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
title_fullStr The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
title_full_unstemmed The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
title_short The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
title_sort effect of us signalling and the us–cs interval on backward conditioning in mice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersondavidj theeffectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice
AT cuellstevenf theeffectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice
AT bannermandavidm theeffectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice
AT sandersondavidj effectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice
AT cuellstevenf effectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice
AT bannermandavidm effectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice