Cargando…
The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice
The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval in backward conditioning was assessed in mice. For one group of mice the presentation of food was signalled by a tone and for another group, food was unsignalled. For half of the mice, within each group, the presentation of food preceded a visual cu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002 |
_version_ | 1782348258706718720 |
---|---|
author | Sanderson, David J. Cuell, Steven F. Bannerman, David M. |
author_facet | Sanderson, David J. Cuell, Steven F. Bannerman, David M. |
author_sort | Sanderson, David J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval in backward conditioning was assessed in mice. For one group of mice the presentation of food was signalled by a tone and for another group, food was unsignalled. For half of the mice, within each group, the presentation of food preceded a visual cue by 10 s. For the other half, food was presented at the start of the visual cue (0-s US–CS interval), resulting in simultaneous pairings of these events. A summation test and a subsequent retardation test were used to assess the inhibitory effects of backward conditioning in comparison to training with a non-reinforced visual cue that controlled for the possible effects of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition caused as a consequence of differential conditioning. In the summation test unsignalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition when the US–CS interval was 10 s, but not 0 s. Signalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition, independent of the US–CS interval. In the retardation test, independent of US signalling, a US–CS interval of 10 s failed to result in inhibition, but an interval of 0 s resulted in greater conditioned responding to the backward CS than the control CS. A generalisation decrement account of the effect of signalling the US with a 0-s US–CS interval, which resulted in reduced responding in the summation test and faster acquisition in the retardation test, is discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4261084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42610842014-12-13 The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice Sanderson, David J. Cuell, Steven F. Bannerman, David M. Learn Motiv Article The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval in backward conditioning was assessed in mice. For one group of mice the presentation of food was signalled by a tone and for another group, food was unsignalled. For half of the mice, within each group, the presentation of food preceded a visual cue by 10 s. For the other half, food was presented at the start of the visual cue (0-s US–CS interval), resulting in simultaneous pairings of these events. A summation test and a subsequent retardation test were used to assess the inhibitory effects of backward conditioning in comparison to training with a non-reinforced visual cue that controlled for the possible effects of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition caused as a consequence of differential conditioning. In the summation test unsignalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition when the US–CS interval was 10 s, but not 0 s. Signalled presentations of the US resulted in inhibition, independent of the US–CS interval. In the retardation test, independent of US signalling, a US–CS interval of 10 s failed to result in inhibition, but an interval of 0 s resulted in greater conditioned responding to the backward CS than the control CS. A generalisation decrement account of the effect of signalling the US with a 0-s US–CS interval, which resulted in reduced responding in the summation test and faster acquisition in the retardation test, is discussed. Academic Press 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4261084/ /pubmed/25512678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002 Text en © 2014 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sanderson, David J. Cuell, Steven F. Bannerman, David M. The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice |
title | The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice |
title_full | The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice |
title_fullStr | The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice |
title_short | The effect of US signalling and the US–CS interval on backward conditioning in mice |
title_sort | effect of us signalling and the us–cs interval on backward conditioning in mice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandersondavidj theeffectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice AT cuellstevenf theeffectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice AT bannermandavidm theeffectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice AT sandersondavidj effectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice AT cuellstevenf effectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice AT bannermandavidm effectofussignallingandtheuscsintervalonbackwardconditioninginmice |