Cargando…
The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-518 |
_version_ | 1782348289294729216 |
---|---|
author | Chaftari, Anne-Marie El Zakhem, Aline Jamal, Mohamed A Jiang, Ying Hachem, Ray Raad, Issam |
author_facet | Chaftari, Anne-Marie El Zakhem, Aline Jamal, Mohamed A Jiang, Ying Hachem, Ray Raad, Issam |
author_sort | Chaftari, Anne-Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA-CLABSI) who had their CVCs exchanged over guidewire for minocycline/rifampin-coated (M/R)-CVC within seven days of bacteremia. METHODS: Each case was matched with two control patients who had SA-CLABSI and had their CVC removed within seven days and two control patients who had their CVC retained beyond seven days. In addition, an in vitro model was developed for exchange of catheters. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with SA-CLABSI. Eight patients had their CVC exchanged over guidewire with M/R-CVC and were compared to 16 patients who had their CVC removed and 16 other patients who had their CVC retained. Patients who had their CVC exchanged over guidewire had a similar clinical response and relapse rates compared to patients whose CVC was removed or retained. However the rate of overall mortality was higher in patients who retained their CVC compared to those whose CVC was exchanged or removed (p = 0.034). The in vitro catheter exchange model showed that catheter exchange over guidewire using M/R-CVC completely prevented biofilm colonization compared to exchange using uncoated CVC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of SA-CLABSI, exchanging the CVC over guidewire with M/R-CVC could be an alternative to removing the CVC and reinserting another CVC at a different site and may be associated with a lower rate of overall mortality. Further large prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-518) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4261544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42615442014-12-10 The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections Chaftari, Anne-Marie El Zakhem, Aline Jamal, Mohamed A Jiang, Ying Hachem, Ray Raad, Issam BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA-CLABSI) who had their CVCs exchanged over guidewire for minocycline/rifampin-coated (M/R)-CVC within seven days of bacteremia. METHODS: Each case was matched with two control patients who had SA-CLABSI and had their CVC removed within seven days and two control patients who had their CVC retained beyond seven days. In addition, an in vitro model was developed for exchange of catheters. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with SA-CLABSI. Eight patients had their CVC exchanged over guidewire with M/R-CVC and were compared to 16 patients who had their CVC removed and 16 other patients who had their CVC retained. Patients who had their CVC exchanged over guidewire had a similar clinical response and relapse rates compared to patients whose CVC was removed or retained. However the rate of overall mortality was higher in patients who retained their CVC compared to those whose CVC was exchanged or removed (p = 0.034). The in vitro catheter exchange model showed that catheter exchange over guidewire using M/R-CVC completely prevented biofilm colonization compared to exchange using uncoated CVC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of SA-CLABSI, exchanging the CVC over guidewire with M/R-CVC could be an alternative to removing the CVC and reinserting another CVC at a different site and may be associated with a lower rate of overall mortality. Further large prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-518) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4261544/ /pubmed/25253042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-518 Text en © Chaftari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chaftari, Anne-Marie El Zakhem, Aline Jamal, Mohamed A Jiang, Ying Hachem, Ray Raad, Issam The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
title | The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
title_full | The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
title_fullStr | The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
title_short | The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
title_sort | use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaftariannemarie theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT elzakhemaline theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT jamalmohameda theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT jiangying theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT hachemray theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT raadissam theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT chaftariannemarie useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT elzakhemaline useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT jamalmohameda useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT jiangying useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT hachemray useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections AT raadissam useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections |