Cargando…

The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaftari, Anne-Marie, El Zakhem, Aline, Jamal, Mohamed A, Jiang, Ying, Hachem, Ray, Raad, Issam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-518
_version_ 1782348289294729216
author Chaftari, Anne-Marie
El Zakhem, Aline
Jamal, Mohamed A
Jiang, Ying
Hachem, Ray
Raad, Issam
author_facet Chaftari, Anne-Marie
El Zakhem, Aline
Jamal, Mohamed A
Jiang, Ying
Hachem, Ray
Raad, Issam
author_sort Chaftari, Anne-Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA-CLABSI) who had their CVCs exchanged over guidewire for minocycline/rifampin-coated (M/R)-CVC within seven days of bacteremia. METHODS: Each case was matched with two control patients who had SA-CLABSI and had their CVC removed within seven days and two control patients who had their CVC retained beyond seven days. In addition, an in vitro model was developed for exchange of catheters. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with SA-CLABSI. Eight patients had their CVC exchanged over guidewire with M/R-CVC and were compared to 16 patients who had their CVC removed and 16 other patients who had their CVC retained. Patients who had their CVC exchanged over guidewire had a similar clinical response and relapse rates compared to patients whose CVC was removed or retained. However the rate of overall mortality was higher in patients who retained their CVC compared to those whose CVC was exchanged or removed (p = 0.034). The in vitro catheter exchange model showed that catheter exchange over guidewire using M/R-CVC completely prevented biofilm colonization compared to exchange using uncoated CVC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of SA-CLABSI, exchanging the CVC over guidewire with M/R-CVC could be an alternative to removing the CVC and reinserting another CVC at a different site and may be associated with a lower rate of overall mortality. Further large prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-518) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4261544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42615442014-12-10 The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections Chaftari, Anne-Marie El Zakhem, Aline Jamal, Mohamed A Jiang, Ying Hachem, Ray Raad, Issam BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA-CLABSI) who had their CVCs exchanged over guidewire for minocycline/rifampin-coated (M/R)-CVC within seven days of bacteremia. METHODS: Each case was matched with two control patients who had SA-CLABSI and had their CVC removed within seven days and two control patients who had their CVC retained beyond seven days. In addition, an in vitro model was developed for exchange of catheters. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with SA-CLABSI. Eight patients had their CVC exchanged over guidewire with M/R-CVC and were compared to 16 patients who had their CVC removed and 16 other patients who had their CVC retained. Patients who had their CVC exchanged over guidewire had a similar clinical response and relapse rates compared to patients whose CVC was removed or retained. However the rate of overall mortality was higher in patients who retained their CVC compared to those whose CVC was exchanged or removed (p = 0.034). The in vitro catheter exchange model showed that catheter exchange over guidewire using M/R-CVC completely prevented biofilm colonization compared to exchange using uncoated CVC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of SA-CLABSI, exchanging the CVC over guidewire with M/R-CVC could be an alternative to removing the CVC and reinserting another CVC at a different site and may be associated with a lower rate of overall mortality. Further large prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-518) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4261544/ /pubmed/25253042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-518 Text en © Chaftari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chaftari, Anne-Marie
El Zakhem, Aline
Jamal, Mohamed A
Jiang, Ying
Hachem, Ray
Raad, Issam
The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
title The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
title_full The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
title_fullStr The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
title_full_unstemmed The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
title_short The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
title_sort use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-518
work_keys_str_mv AT chaftariannemarie theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT elzakhemaline theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT jamalmohameda theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT jiangying theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT hachemray theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT raadissam theuseofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT chaftariannemarie useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT elzakhemaline useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT jamalmohameda useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT jiangying useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT hachemray useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT raadissam useofminocyclinerifampincoatedcentralvenouscathetersforexchangeofcathetersinthesettingofstaphylococcusaureuscentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections