Cargando…

Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies

BACKGROUND: Non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle occurs upon recovery from primary disease during the first year of life. Continuous exposure to infection through contaminated tick infestations with absence of clinical disease gives rise to endemic stability. Endemic stable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabi, Fredrick, Masembe, Charles, Muwanika, Vincent, Kirunda, Halid, Negrini, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25175844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-414
_version_ 1782348293374738432
author Kabi, Fredrick
Masembe, Charles
Muwanika, Vincent
Kirunda, Halid
Negrini, Riccardo
author_facet Kabi, Fredrick
Masembe, Charles
Muwanika, Vincent
Kirunda, Halid
Negrini, Riccardo
author_sort Kabi, Fredrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle occurs upon recovery from primary disease during the first year of life. Continuous exposure to infection through contaminated tick infestations with absence of clinical disease gives rise to endemic stability. Endemic stable populations may become sources of infection if contaminated tick vectors are shared with susceptible exotic cattle. This study aimed at establishing a nationwide distribution of non-clinical T. parva infection among indigenous cattle populations to inform novel control strategies. METHODS: The occurrence of non-clinical T. parva infection among apparently healthy 925 indigenous cattle from 209 herds spread out in 10 agro-ecological zones (AEZs) was determined using a nested PCR assay. The influence of AEZ, breed, sex, age and farmers’ ranking of ECF importance were interrogated for influence of non-clinical parasite occurrence. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of non-clinical T. parva infection was 30% (278/925). A gradual increase of non-clinical T. parva infection was observed ranging from 17% (95% CI: 0.03 – 0.23) to 43% (95% CI: 0.3 – 0.55) in the North Eastern Savannah Grasslands (NESG) to the Western Highland Ranges (WHR) respectively. A similarly associated 18% (95% CI: 0.07 – 0.28) and 35% (95% CI: 0.3 – 0.39) non-clinical parasite prevalence was observed among the East African shorthorn Zebu (EASZ) and Ankole cattle respectively. Average herd level non-clinical T. parva prevalence was 28%, ranging from zero to 100%. The likelihood of non-clinical T. parva infection was 35.5% greater in the western highlands compared to the northeastern semi-arid AEZs. CONCLUSIONS: Non-clinical T. parva occurs countrywide, structured along patterns of AEZ and breed gradients. These findings may guide policy formulation, deployment of integrated control strategies and local cattle improvement programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4261563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42615632014-12-10 Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies Kabi, Fredrick Masembe, Charles Muwanika, Vincent Kirunda, Halid Negrini, Riccardo Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle occurs upon recovery from primary disease during the first year of life. Continuous exposure to infection through contaminated tick infestations with absence of clinical disease gives rise to endemic stability. Endemic stable populations may become sources of infection if contaminated tick vectors are shared with susceptible exotic cattle. This study aimed at establishing a nationwide distribution of non-clinical T. parva infection among indigenous cattle populations to inform novel control strategies. METHODS: The occurrence of non-clinical T. parva infection among apparently healthy 925 indigenous cattle from 209 herds spread out in 10 agro-ecological zones (AEZs) was determined using a nested PCR assay. The influence of AEZ, breed, sex, age and farmers’ ranking of ECF importance were interrogated for influence of non-clinical parasite occurrence. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of non-clinical T. parva infection was 30% (278/925). A gradual increase of non-clinical T. parva infection was observed ranging from 17% (95% CI: 0.03 – 0.23) to 43% (95% CI: 0.3 – 0.55) in the North Eastern Savannah Grasslands (NESG) to the Western Highland Ranges (WHR) respectively. A similarly associated 18% (95% CI: 0.07 – 0.28) and 35% (95% CI: 0.3 – 0.39) non-clinical parasite prevalence was observed among the East African shorthorn Zebu (EASZ) and Ankole cattle respectively. Average herd level non-clinical T. parva prevalence was 28%, ranging from zero to 100%. The likelihood of non-clinical T. parva infection was 35.5% greater in the western highlands compared to the northeastern semi-arid AEZs. CONCLUSIONS: Non-clinical T. parva occurs countrywide, structured along patterns of AEZ and breed gradients. These findings may guide policy formulation, deployment of integrated control strategies and local cattle improvement programs. BioMed Central 2014-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4261563/ /pubmed/25175844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-414 Text en © Kabi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kabi, Fredrick
Masembe, Charles
Muwanika, Vincent
Kirunda, Halid
Negrini, Riccardo
Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies
title Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies
title_full Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies
title_fullStr Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies
title_full_unstemmed Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies
title_short Geographic distribution of non-clinical Theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of Uganda: implications for control strategies
title_sort geographic distribution of non-clinical theileria parva infection among indigenous cattle populations in contrasting agro-ecological zones of uganda: implications for control strategies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25175844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-414
work_keys_str_mv AT kabifredrick geographicdistributionofnonclinicaltheileriaparvainfectionamongindigenouscattlepopulationsincontrastingagroecologicalzonesofugandaimplicationsforcontrolstrategies
AT masembecharles geographicdistributionofnonclinicaltheileriaparvainfectionamongindigenouscattlepopulationsincontrastingagroecologicalzonesofugandaimplicationsforcontrolstrategies
AT muwanikavincent geographicdistributionofnonclinicaltheileriaparvainfectionamongindigenouscattlepopulationsincontrastingagroecologicalzonesofugandaimplicationsforcontrolstrategies
AT kirundahalid geographicdistributionofnonclinicaltheileriaparvainfectionamongindigenouscattlepopulationsincontrastingagroecologicalzonesofugandaimplicationsforcontrolstrategies
AT negriniriccardo geographicdistributionofnonclinicaltheileriaparvainfectionamongindigenouscattlepopulationsincontrastingagroecologicalzonesofugandaimplicationsforcontrolstrategies