Cargando…

Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries

BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life after childbirth is an important health-outcome measurement for new mothers and is of special interest in midwifery. The Mother-Generated Index (MGI) is a validated instrument to assess postnatal quality of life. The tool has not been applied for making a cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne, van Teijlingen, Edwin, Gross, Mechthild M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-277
_version_ 1782348301416267776
author Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
van Teijlingen, Edwin
Gross, Mechthild M
author_facet Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
van Teijlingen, Edwin
Gross, Mechthild M
author_sort Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life after childbirth is an important health-outcome measurement for new mothers and is of special interest in midwifery. The Mother-Generated Index (MGI) is a validated instrument to assess postnatal quality of life. The tool has not been applied for making a cross-cultural comparison before. This study investigated (a) responses to the MGI in German-speaking women in Germany and Switzerland; and (b) associations between MGI scores on the one hand and maternity and midwifery care on the other. METHODS: A two-stage survey was conducted in two rural hospitals 10 km apart, on opposite sides of the German-Swiss border. The questionnaires included the MGI and questions on socio-demographics, physical and mental health and maternity care, and were distributed during the first days after birth and six weeks postpartum. Parametric and non-parametric tests were computed with the statistical programme SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 129 questionnaires were returned an average of three days after birth and 83 in the follow-up after seven weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in the MGI scores between the German and the Swiss women (p = 0.22). Significantly more favourable MGI scores were found associated with more adequate information during pregnancy (p = 0.02), a more satisfactory birth experience (p < 0.01), epidural anaesthesia (p < 0.01), more information (p = 0.01) and better support (p = 0.02) during the time in hospital and less disturbed sleep (p < 0.01). Significantly lower MGI scores were associated with the presence of a private doctor during birth (p = 0.01) and with exclusive breastfeeding during the first postnatal days (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The MGI scores of these German-speaking women were higher than those in other studies reported previously. Thus the tool may be able to detect differences in postnatal quality of life among women with substantially divergent cultural backgrounds. Shortcomings in maternity and midwifery care were detected, as for example the inadequate provision of information during pregnancy, a lack of individualised postpartum care during the hospital stay and insufficient support for exclusively breastfeeding mothers. The MGI is an appropriate instrument for maternity care outcome measurement in cross-cultural comparison research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4261596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42615962014-12-10 Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne van Teijlingen, Edwin Gross, Mechthild M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life after childbirth is an important health-outcome measurement for new mothers and is of special interest in midwifery. The Mother-Generated Index (MGI) is a validated instrument to assess postnatal quality of life. The tool has not been applied for making a cross-cultural comparison before. This study investigated (a) responses to the MGI in German-speaking women in Germany and Switzerland; and (b) associations between MGI scores on the one hand and maternity and midwifery care on the other. METHODS: A two-stage survey was conducted in two rural hospitals 10 km apart, on opposite sides of the German-Swiss border. The questionnaires included the MGI and questions on socio-demographics, physical and mental health and maternity care, and were distributed during the first days after birth and six weeks postpartum. Parametric and non-parametric tests were computed with the statistical programme SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 129 questionnaires were returned an average of three days after birth and 83 in the follow-up after seven weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in the MGI scores between the German and the Swiss women (p = 0.22). Significantly more favourable MGI scores were found associated with more adequate information during pregnancy (p = 0.02), a more satisfactory birth experience (p < 0.01), epidural anaesthesia (p < 0.01), more information (p = 0.01) and better support (p = 0.02) during the time in hospital and less disturbed sleep (p < 0.01). Significantly lower MGI scores were associated with the presence of a private doctor during birth (p = 0.01) and with exclusive breastfeeding during the first postnatal days (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The MGI scores of these German-speaking women were higher than those in other studies reported previously. Thus the tool may be able to detect differences in postnatal quality of life among women with substantially divergent cultural backgrounds. Shortcomings in maternity and midwifery care were detected, as for example the inadequate provision of information during pregnancy, a lack of individualised postpartum care during the hospital stay and insufficient support for exclusively breastfeeding mothers. The MGI is an appropriate instrument for maternity care outcome measurement in cross-cultural comparison research. BioMed Central 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4261596/ /pubmed/25128290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-277 Text en © Grylka-Baeschlin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
van Teijlingen, Edwin
Gross, Mechthild M
Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
title Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
title_full Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
title_fullStr Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
title_full_unstemmed Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
title_short Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
title_sort cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among german-speaking women – a prospective survey in two countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-277
work_keys_str_mv AT grylkabaeschlinsusanne culturaldifferencesinpostnatalqualityoflifeamonggermanspeakingwomenaprospectivesurveyintwocountries
AT vanteijlingenedwin culturaldifferencesinpostnatalqualityoflifeamonggermanspeakingwomenaprospectivesurveyintwocountries
AT grossmechthildm culturaldifferencesinpostnatalqualityoflifeamonggermanspeakingwomenaprospectivesurveyintwocountries