Cargando…

Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol

BACKGROUND: Between 40,000 and 80,000 pregnant women die annually from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Although magnesium sulphate and anti-hypertensive therapies can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia, the only cure comes with delivery. Prompt delivery of the baby, prefer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bracken, Hillary, Mundle, Shuchita, Faragher, Brian, Easterling, Thomas, Haycox, Alan, Turner, Mark, Alfirevic, Zarko, Winikoff, Beverly, Weeks, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-308
_version_ 1782348307151978496
author Bracken, Hillary
Mundle, Shuchita
Faragher, Brian
Easterling, Thomas
Haycox, Alan
Turner, Mark
Alfirevic, Zarko
Winikoff, Beverly
Weeks, Andrew
author_facet Bracken, Hillary
Mundle, Shuchita
Faragher, Brian
Easterling, Thomas
Haycox, Alan
Turner, Mark
Alfirevic, Zarko
Winikoff, Beverly
Weeks, Andrew
author_sort Bracken, Hillary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Between 40,000 and 80,000 pregnant women die annually from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Although magnesium sulphate and anti-hypertensive therapies can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia, the only cure comes with delivery. Prompt delivery of the baby, preferably by vaginal route, is vital in order to achieve good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Induction of labour is therefore a critical intervention in order to prevent morbidity to both mother and baby. Two low cost interventions – oral misoprostol tablets and transcervical Foley catheterization – are already used by some in low resource settings, but their relative risks and benefits are not known. The trial will compare the risks, benefits, and trade-offs in efficacy, safety, acceptability and cost of misoprostol and Foley catheter for induction in women with preeclampsia or uncontrolled hypertension. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 602 women with an ongoing pregnancy with a live fetus requiring delivery because of pre-eclampsia or uncontrolled hypertension will be randomly assigned to labor induction with a transcervical Foley catheter or oral misoprostol 25 micrograms. Women will be recruited at two hospitals in Nagpur, India. The misoprostol group will receive oral misoprostol 25 microgram every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until active labor commences. The Foley group will undergo induction using a Foley catheter (silicone, size 18 F with 30 ml balloon) which will remain until active labor starts, the Foley catheter falls out, or 12 hours have elapsed. The primary outcome will be the attainment of vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Providers administering the treatment and those assessing the outcomes will not be blinded to group assignment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01801410 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4261642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42616422014-12-10 Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol Bracken, Hillary Mundle, Shuchita Faragher, Brian Easterling, Thomas Haycox, Alan Turner, Mark Alfirevic, Zarko Winikoff, Beverly Weeks, Andrew BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Between 40,000 and 80,000 pregnant women die annually from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Although magnesium sulphate and anti-hypertensive therapies can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia, the only cure comes with delivery. Prompt delivery of the baby, preferably by vaginal route, is vital in order to achieve good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Induction of labour is therefore a critical intervention in order to prevent morbidity to both mother and baby. Two low cost interventions – oral misoprostol tablets and transcervical Foley catheterization – are already used by some in low resource settings, but their relative risks and benefits are not known. The trial will compare the risks, benefits, and trade-offs in efficacy, safety, acceptability and cost of misoprostol and Foley catheter for induction in women with preeclampsia or uncontrolled hypertension. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 602 women with an ongoing pregnancy with a live fetus requiring delivery because of pre-eclampsia or uncontrolled hypertension will be randomly assigned to labor induction with a transcervical Foley catheter or oral misoprostol 25 micrograms. Women will be recruited at two hospitals in Nagpur, India. The misoprostol group will receive oral misoprostol 25 microgram every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until active labor commences. The Foley group will undergo induction using a Foley catheter (silicone, size 18 F with 30 ml balloon) which will remain until active labor starts, the Foley catheter falls out, or 12 hours have elapsed. The primary outcome will be the attainment of vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Providers administering the treatment and those assessing the outcomes will not be blinded to group assignment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01801410 (ClinicalTrials.gov). BioMed Central 2014-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4261642/ /pubmed/25193157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-308 Text en © Bracken et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bracken, Hillary
Mundle, Shuchita
Faragher, Brian
Easterling, Thomas
Haycox, Alan
Turner, Mark
Alfirevic, Zarko
Winikoff, Beverly
Weeks, Andrew
Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
title Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
title_full Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
title_fullStr Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
title_full_unstemmed Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
title_short Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
title_sort induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-308
work_keys_str_mv AT brackenhillary inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT mundleshuchita inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT faragherbrian inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT easterlingthomas inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT haycoxalan inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT turnermark inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT alfireviczarko inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT winikoffbeverly inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol
AT weeksandrew inductionoflabourinpreeclampticwomenarandomisedtrialcomparingthefoleyballooncatheterwithoralmisoprostol