Cargando…
Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism
I argue for sensory pluralism. This is the view that there are many forms of sensory interaction and unity, and no single category that classifies them all. In other words, sensory interactions do not form a single natural kind. This view suggests that how we classify sensory systems (and the experi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25540630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01426 |
_version_ | 1782348313062801408 |
---|---|
author | Fulkerson, Matthew |
author_facet | Fulkerson, Matthew |
author_sort | Fulkerson, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | I argue for sensory pluralism. This is the view that there are many forms of sensory interaction and unity, and no single category that classifies them all. In other words, sensory interactions do not form a single natural kind. This view suggests that how we classify sensory systems (and the experiences they generate) partly depends on our explanatory purposes. I begin with a detailed discussion of the issue as it arises for our understanding of thermal perception, followed by a general account and defense of sensory pluralism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4261717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42617172014-12-24 Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism Fulkerson, Matthew Front Psychol Psychology I argue for sensory pluralism. This is the view that there are many forms of sensory interaction and unity, and no single category that classifies them all. In other words, sensory interactions do not form a single natural kind. This view suggests that how we classify sensory systems (and the experiences they generate) partly depends on our explanatory purposes. I begin with a detailed discussion of the issue as it arises for our understanding of thermal perception, followed by a general account and defense of sensory pluralism. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4261717/ /pubmed/25540630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01426 Text en Copyright © 2014 Fulkerson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Fulkerson, Matthew Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
title | Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
title_full | Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
title_fullStr | Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
title_short | Rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
title_sort | rethinking the senses and their interactions: the case for sensory pluralism |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25540630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fulkersonmatthew rethinkingthesensesandtheirinteractionsthecaseforsensorypluralism |