Cargando…
Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x |
_version_ | 1782348351864307712 |
---|---|
author | Bhandari, Tina Socransky, Steven J |
author_facet | Bhandari, Tina Socransky, Steven J |
author_sort | Bhandari, Tina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the frequency with which a CS >50% is found using Doppler when no such stenosis was visible using B-mode. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients referred to the stroke clinic and 100 patients referred for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients had an elective carotid ultrasound done at Health Sciences North. The ultrasound reports were mixed together and blinded. Investigators determined if there was a CS of greater or less than 50% based on the carotid diagram. These results were compared to the degree of CS found on Doppler. RESULTS: In the CEA group, there were 198 ultrasounds, with 153 showing a CS of >50%. Only one case of CS >50% was missed by B-mode. In the clinic group, 32 of 192 ultrasounds showed a CS of >50%. None were missed by B-mode. B-mode had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% and a specificity of 65%. CONCLUSION: This study supports the theory that it may be possible to use B-mode ultrasound without Doppler to reliably determine if there is CS above or below 50%. Further research is required before carotid ultrasound using B-mode alone can be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4261905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42619052014-12-11 Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study Bhandari, Tina Socransky, Steven J Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the frequency with which a CS >50% is found using Doppler when no such stenosis was visible using B-mode. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients referred to the stroke clinic and 100 patients referred for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients had an elective carotid ultrasound done at Health Sciences North. The ultrasound reports were mixed together and blinded. Investigators determined if there was a CS of greater or less than 50% based on the carotid diagram. These results were compared to the degree of CS found on Doppler. RESULTS: In the CEA group, there were 198 ultrasounds, with 153 showing a CS of >50%. Only one case of CS >50% was missed by B-mode. In the clinic group, 32 of 192 ultrasounds showed a CS of >50%. None were missed by B-mode. B-mode had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% and a specificity of 65%. CONCLUSION: This study supports the theory that it may be possible to use B-mode ultrasound without Doppler to reliably determine if there is CS above or below 50%. Further research is required before carotid ultrasound using B-mode alone can be recommended. Springer 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4261905/ /pubmed/25505941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x Text en Copyright © 2014 Bhandari and Socransky; licensee Springer. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhandari, Tina Socransky, Steven J Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study |
title | Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study |
title_full | Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study |
title_short | Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study |
title_sort | is b-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhandaritina isbmodeultrasoundaloneasufficientscreeningtoolforcarotidstenosisapilotstudy AT socranskystevenj isbmodeultrasoundaloneasufficientscreeningtoolforcarotidstenosisapilotstudy |