Cargando…

Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhandari, Tina, Socransky, Steven J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x
_version_ 1782348351864307712
author Bhandari, Tina
Socransky, Steven J
author_facet Bhandari, Tina
Socransky, Steven J
author_sort Bhandari, Tina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the frequency with which a CS >50% is found using Doppler when no such stenosis was visible using B-mode. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients referred to the stroke clinic and 100 patients referred for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients had an elective carotid ultrasound done at Health Sciences North. The ultrasound reports were mixed together and blinded. Investigators determined if there was a CS of greater or less than 50% based on the carotid diagram. These results were compared to the degree of CS found on Doppler. RESULTS: In the CEA group, there were 198 ultrasounds, with 153 showing a CS of >50%. Only one case of CS >50% was missed by B-mode. In the clinic group, 32 of 192 ultrasounds showed a CS of >50%. None were missed by B-mode. B-mode had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% and a specificity of 65%. CONCLUSION: This study supports the theory that it may be possible to use B-mode ultrasound without Doppler to reliably determine if there is CS above or below 50%. Further research is required before carotid ultrasound using B-mode alone can be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4261905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42619052014-12-11 Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study Bhandari, Tina Socransky, Steven J Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the frequency with which a CS >50% is found using Doppler when no such stenosis was visible using B-mode. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients referred to the stroke clinic and 100 patients referred for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients had an elective carotid ultrasound done at Health Sciences North. The ultrasound reports were mixed together and blinded. Investigators determined if there was a CS of greater or less than 50% based on the carotid diagram. These results were compared to the degree of CS found on Doppler. RESULTS: In the CEA group, there were 198 ultrasounds, with 153 showing a CS of >50%. Only one case of CS >50% was missed by B-mode. In the clinic group, 32 of 192 ultrasounds showed a CS of >50%. None were missed by B-mode. B-mode had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% and a specificity of 65%. CONCLUSION: This study supports the theory that it may be possible to use B-mode ultrasound without Doppler to reliably determine if there is CS above or below 50%. Further research is required before carotid ultrasound using B-mode alone can be recommended. Springer 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4261905/ /pubmed/25505941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x Text en Copyright © 2014 Bhandari and Socransky; licensee Springer.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhandari, Tina
Socransky, Steven J
Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
title Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
title_full Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
title_fullStr Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
title_short Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study
title_sort is b-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4261905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bhandaritina isbmodeultrasoundaloneasufficientscreeningtoolforcarotidstenosisapilotstudy
AT socranskystevenj isbmodeultrasoundaloneasufficientscreeningtoolforcarotidstenosisapilotstudy