Cargando…
Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
INTRODUCTION: Despite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14001 |
_version_ | 1782348394704928768 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yi Tian Haines, Terry P Ritchie, Paul Walker, Craig Ansell, Teri A Ryan, Danielle T Lim, Phaik-Sim Vij, Sanjiv Acs, Rebecca Fealy, Nigel Skinner, Elizabeth H |
author_facet | Wang, Yi Tian Haines, Terry P Ritchie, Paul Walker, Craig Ansell, Teri A Ryan, Danielle T Lim, Phaik-Sim Vij, Sanjiv Acs, Rebecca Fealy, Nigel Skinner, Elizabeth H |
author_sort | Wang, Yi Tian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe or affects filter lifespan. Our objective in this study was to test the safety and feasibility of mobilization in this population. METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy via femoral, subclavian or internal jugular vascular access catheters at two general medical-surgical intensive care units in Australia were enrolled. Patients underwent one of three levels of mobilization intervention as appropriate: (1) passive bed exercises, (2) sitting on the bed edge or (3) standing and/or marching. Catheter dislodgement, haematoma and bleeding during and following interventions were evaluated. Filter pressure parameters and lifespan (hours), nursing workload and concern were also measured. RESULTS: No episodes of filter occlusion or failure occurred during any of the interventions. No adverse events were detected. The intervention filters lasted longer than the nonintervention filters (regression coefficient = 13.8 (robust 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.0 to 22.6), P = 0.003). In sensitivity analyses, we found that filter life was longer in patients who had more position changes (regression coefficient = 2.0 (robust 95% CI = 0.6 to 3.5), P = 0.007). The nursing workloads between the intervention shift and the following shift were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization during renal replacement therapy via a vascular catheter in patients who are critically ill is safe and may increase filter life. These findings have significant implications for the current mobility restrictions imposed on patients with femoral vascular catheters for renal replacement therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000733976 (registered 13 July 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/cc14001) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4262200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42622002014-12-11 Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life Wang, Yi Tian Haines, Terry P Ritchie, Paul Walker, Craig Ansell, Teri A Ryan, Danielle T Lim, Phaik-Sim Vij, Sanjiv Acs, Rebecca Fealy, Nigel Skinner, Elizabeth H Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Despite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe or affects filter lifespan. Our objective in this study was to test the safety and feasibility of mobilization in this population. METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy via femoral, subclavian or internal jugular vascular access catheters at two general medical-surgical intensive care units in Australia were enrolled. Patients underwent one of three levels of mobilization intervention as appropriate: (1) passive bed exercises, (2) sitting on the bed edge or (3) standing and/or marching. Catheter dislodgement, haematoma and bleeding during and following interventions were evaluated. Filter pressure parameters and lifespan (hours), nursing workload and concern were also measured. RESULTS: No episodes of filter occlusion or failure occurred during any of the interventions. No adverse events were detected. The intervention filters lasted longer than the nonintervention filters (regression coefficient = 13.8 (robust 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.0 to 22.6), P = 0.003). In sensitivity analyses, we found that filter life was longer in patients who had more position changes (regression coefficient = 2.0 (robust 95% CI = 0.6 to 3.5), P = 0.007). The nursing workloads between the intervention shift and the following shift were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization during renal replacement therapy via a vascular catheter in patients who are critically ill is safe and may increase filter life. These findings have significant implications for the current mobility restrictions imposed on patients with femoral vascular catheters for renal replacement therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000733976 (registered 13 July 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/cc14001) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-07-28 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4262200/ /pubmed/25069952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14001 Text en © Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Yi Tian Haines, Terry P Ritchie, Paul Walker, Craig Ansell, Teri A Ryan, Danielle T Lim, Phaik-Sim Vij, Sanjiv Acs, Rebecca Fealy, Nigel Skinner, Elizabeth H Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
title | Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
title_full | Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
title_fullStr | Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
title_full_unstemmed | Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
title_short | Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
title_sort | early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyitian earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT hainesterryp earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT ritchiepaul earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT walkercraig earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT ansellteria earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT ryandaniellet earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT limphaiksim earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT vijsanjiv earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT acsrebecca earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT fealynigel earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife AT skinnerelizabethh earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife |