Cargando…

Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life

INTRODUCTION: Despite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yi Tian, Haines, Terry P, Ritchie, Paul, Walker, Craig, Ansell, Teri A, Ryan, Danielle T, Lim, Phaik-Sim, Vij, Sanjiv, Acs, Rebecca, Fealy, Nigel, Skinner, Elizabeth H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14001
_version_ 1782348394704928768
author Wang, Yi Tian
Haines, Terry P
Ritchie, Paul
Walker, Craig
Ansell, Teri A
Ryan, Danielle T
Lim, Phaik-Sim
Vij, Sanjiv
Acs, Rebecca
Fealy, Nigel
Skinner, Elizabeth H
author_facet Wang, Yi Tian
Haines, Terry P
Ritchie, Paul
Walker, Craig
Ansell, Teri A
Ryan, Danielle T
Lim, Phaik-Sim
Vij, Sanjiv
Acs, Rebecca
Fealy, Nigel
Skinner, Elizabeth H
author_sort Wang, Yi Tian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe or affects filter lifespan. Our objective in this study was to test the safety and feasibility of mobilization in this population. METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy via femoral, subclavian or internal jugular vascular access catheters at two general medical-surgical intensive care units in Australia were enrolled. Patients underwent one of three levels of mobilization intervention as appropriate: (1) passive bed exercises, (2) sitting on the bed edge or (3) standing and/or marching. Catheter dislodgement, haematoma and bleeding during and following interventions were evaluated. Filter pressure parameters and lifespan (hours), nursing workload and concern were also measured. RESULTS: No episodes of filter occlusion or failure occurred during any of the interventions. No adverse events were detected. The intervention filters lasted longer than the nonintervention filters (regression coefficient = 13.8 (robust 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.0 to 22.6), P = 0.003). In sensitivity analyses, we found that filter life was longer in patients who had more position changes (regression coefficient = 2.0 (robust 95% CI = 0.6 to 3.5), P = 0.007). The nursing workloads between the intervention shift and the following shift were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization during renal replacement therapy via a vascular catheter in patients who are critically ill is safe and may increase filter life. These findings have significant implications for the current mobility restrictions imposed on patients with femoral vascular catheters for renal replacement therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000733976 (registered 13 July 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/cc14001) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4262200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42622002014-12-11 Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life Wang, Yi Tian Haines, Terry P Ritchie, Paul Walker, Craig Ansell, Teri A Ryan, Danielle T Lim, Phaik-Sim Vij, Sanjiv Acs, Rebecca Fealy, Nigel Skinner, Elizabeth H Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Despite studies demonstrating benefit, patients with femoral vascular catheters placed for continuous renal replacement therapy are frequently restricted from mobilization. No researchers have reported filter pressures during mobilization, and it is unknown whether mobilization is safe or affects filter lifespan. Our objective in this study was to test the safety and feasibility of mobilization in this population. METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy via femoral, subclavian or internal jugular vascular access catheters at two general medical-surgical intensive care units in Australia were enrolled. Patients underwent one of three levels of mobilization intervention as appropriate: (1) passive bed exercises, (2) sitting on the bed edge or (3) standing and/or marching. Catheter dislodgement, haematoma and bleeding during and following interventions were evaluated. Filter pressure parameters and lifespan (hours), nursing workload and concern were also measured. RESULTS: No episodes of filter occlusion or failure occurred during any of the interventions. No adverse events were detected. The intervention filters lasted longer than the nonintervention filters (regression coefficient = 13.8 (robust 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.0 to 22.6), P = 0.003). In sensitivity analyses, we found that filter life was longer in patients who had more position changes (regression coefficient = 2.0 (robust 95% CI = 0.6 to 3.5), P = 0.007). The nursing workloads between the intervention shift and the following shift were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization during renal replacement therapy via a vascular catheter in patients who are critically ill is safe and may increase filter life. These findings have significant implications for the current mobility restrictions imposed on patients with femoral vascular catheters for renal replacement therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000733976 (registered 13 July 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/cc14001) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-07-28 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4262200/ /pubmed/25069952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14001 Text en © Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Yi Tian
Haines, Terry P
Ritchie, Paul
Walker, Craig
Ansell, Teri A
Ryan, Danielle T
Lim, Phaik-Sim
Vij, Sanjiv
Acs, Rebecca
Fealy, Nigel
Skinner, Elizabeth H
Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
title Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
title_full Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
title_fullStr Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
title_full_unstemmed Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
title_short Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
title_sort early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14001
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyitian earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT hainesterryp earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT ritchiepaul earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT walkercraig earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT ansellteria earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT ryandaniellet earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT limphaiksim earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT vijsanjiv earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT acsrebecca earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT fealynigel earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife
AT skinnerelizabethh earlymobilizationoncontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyissafeandmayimprovefilterlife