Cargando…

A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone

BACKGROUND: Addition of whole-brain irradiation (WBI) to radiosurgery for treatment of few cerebral metastases is controversial. This study aimed to create an instrument that estimates the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery to facilitate the decision regarding addit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huttenlocher, Stefan, Dziggel, Liesa, Hornung, Dagmar, Blanck, Oliver, Schild, Steven E, Rades, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-215
_version_ 1782348403036913664
author Huttenlocher, Stefan
Dziggel, Liesa
Hornung, Dagmar
Blanck, Oliver
Schild, Steven E
Rades, Dirk
author_facet Huttenlocher, Stefan
Dziggel, Liesa
Hornung, Dagmar
Blanck, Oliver
Schild, Steven E
Rades, Dirk
author_sort Huttenlocher, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Addition of whole-brain irradiation (WBI) to radiosurgery for treatment of few cerebral metastases is controversial. This study aimed to create an instrument that estimates the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery to facilitate the decision regarding additional WBI. METHODS: Nine characteristics were investigated for associations with the development of new cerebral metastases including radiosurgery dose (dose equivalent to <20 Gy vs. 20 Gy vs. >20 Gy for tumor cell kill, prescribed to the 73-90% isodose level), age (≤60 vs. ≥61 years), gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (0-1 vs. 2), primary tumor type (breast cancer vs. non-small lung cancer vs. malignant melanoma vs. others), number/size of cerebral metastases (1 lesion <15 mm vs. 1 lesion ≥15 mm vs. 2 or 3 lesions), location of the cerebral metastases (supratentorial alone vs. infratentorial ± supratentorial), extra-cerebra metastases (no vs. yes) and time between first diagnosis of the primary tumor and radiosurgery (≤15 vs. >15 months). RESULTS: Number of cerebral metastases (p = 0.002), primary tumor type (p = 0.10) and extra-cerebral metastases (p = 0.06) showed significant associations with development of new cerebral metastases or a trend, and were integrated into the predictive instrument. Scoring points were calculated from 6-months freedom from new cerebral metastases rates. Three groups were formed, group I (16-17 points, N = 47), group II (18-20 points, N = 120) and group III (21-22 points, N = 47). Six-month rates of freedom from new cerebral metastases were 36%, 65% and 80%, respectively (p < 0.001). Corresponding rates at 12 months were 27%, 44% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This new instrument enables the physician to estimate the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone. Patients of groups I and II appear good candidates for additional WBI in addition to radiosurgery, whereas patients of group III may not require WBI in addition to radiosurgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4262235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42622352014-12-11 A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone Huttenlocher, Stefan Dziggel, Liesa Hornung, Dagmar Blanck, Oliver Schild, Steven E Rades, Dirk Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Addition of whole-brain irradiation (WBI) to radiosurgery for treatment of few cerebral metastases is controversial. This study aimed to create an instrument that estimates the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery to facilitate the decision regarding additional WBI. METHODS: Nine characteristics were investigated for associations with the development of new cerebral metastases including radiosurgery dose (dose equivalent to <20 Gy vs. 20 Gy vs. >20 Gy for tumor cell kill, prescribed to the 73-90% isodose level), age (≤60 vs. ≥61 years), gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (0-1 vs. 2), primary tumor type (breast cancer vs. non-small lung cancer vs. malignant melanoma vs. others), number/size of cerebral metastases (1 lesion <15 mm vs. 1 lesion ≥15 mm vs. 2 or 3 lesions), location of the cerebral metastases (supratentorial alone vs. infratentorial ± supratentorial), extra-cerebra metastases (no vs. yes) and time between first diagnosis of the primary tumor and radiosurgery (≤15 vs. >15 months). RESULTS: Number of cerebral metastases (p = 0.002), primary tumor type (p = 0.10) and extra-cerebral metastases (p = 0.06) showed significant associations with development of new cerebral metastases or a trend, and were integrated into the predictive instrument. Scoring points were calculated from 6-months freedom from new cerebral metastases rates. Three groups were formed, group I (16-17 points, N = 47), group II (18-20 points, N = 120) and group III (21-22 points, N = 47). Six-month rates of freedom from new cerebral metastases were 36%, 65% and 80%, respectively (p < 0.001). Corresponding rates at 12 months were 27%, 44% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This new instrument enables the physician to estimate the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone. Patients of groups I and II appear good candidates for additional WBI in addition to radiosurgery, whereas patients of group III may not require WBI in addition to radiosurgery. BioMed Central 2014-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4262235/ /pubmed/25240823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-215 Text en © Huttenlocher et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Huttenlocher, Stefan
Dziggel, Liesa
Hornung, Dagmar
Blanck, Oliver
Schild, Steven E
Rades, Dirk
A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
title A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
title_full A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
title_fullStr A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
title_full_unstemmed A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
title_short A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
title_sort new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-215
work_keys_str_mv AT huttenlocherstefan anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT dziggelliesa anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT hornungdagmar anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT blanckoliver anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT schildstevene anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT radesdirk anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT huttenlocherstefan newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT dziggelliesa newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT hornungdagmar newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT blanckoliver newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT schildstevene newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone
AT radesdirk newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone