Cargando…
A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone
BACKGROUND: Addition of whole-brain irradiation (WBI) to radiosurgery for treatment of few cerebral metastases is controversial. This study aimed to create an instrument that estimates the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery to facilitate the decision regarding addit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-215 |
_version_ | 1782348403036913664 |
---|---|
author | Huttenlocher, Stefan Dziggel, Liesa Hornung, Dagmar Blanck, Oliver Schild, Steven E Rades, Dirk |
author_facet | Huttenlocher, Stefan Dziggel, Liesa Hornung, Dagmar Blanck, Oliver Schild, Steven E Rades, Dirk |
author_sort | Huttenlocher, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Addition of whole-brain irradiation (WBI) to radiosurgery for treatment of few cerebral metastases is controversial. This study aimed to create an instrument that estimates the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery to facilitate the decision regarding additional WBI. METHODS: Nine characteristics were investigated for associations with the development of new cerebral metastases including radiosurgery dose (dose equivalent to <20 Gy vs. 20 Gy vs. >20 Gy for tumor cell kill, prescribed to the 73-90% isodose level), age (≤60 vs. ≥61 years), gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (0-1 vs. 2), primary tumor type (breast cancer vs. non-small lung cancer vs. malignant melanoma vs. others), number/size of cerebral metastases (1 lesion <15 mm vs. 1 lesion ≥15 mm vs. 2 or 3 lesions), location of the cerebral metastases (supratentorial alone vs. infratentorial ± supratentorial), extra-cerebra metastases (no vs. yes) and time between first diagnosis of the primary tumor and radiosurgery (≤15 vs. >15 months). RESULTS: Number of cerebral metastases (p = 0.002), primary tumor type (p = 0.10) and extra-cerebral metastases (p = 0.06) showed significant associations with development of new cerebral metastases or a trend, and were integrated into the predictive instrument. Scoring points were calculated from 6-months freedom from new cerebral metastases rates. Three groups were formed, group I (16-17 points, N = 47), group II (18-20 points, N = 120) and group III (21-22 points, N = 47). Six-month rates of freedom from new cerebral metastases were 36%, 65% and 80%, respectively (p < 0.001). Corresponding rates at 12 months were 27%, 44% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This new instrument enables the physician to estimate the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone. Patients of groups I and II appear good candidates for additional WBI in addition to radiosurgery, whereas patients of group III may not require WBI in addition to radiosurgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4262235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42622352014-12-11 A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone Huttenlocher, Stefan Dziggel, Liesa Hornung, Dagmar Blanck, Oliver Schild, Steven E Rades, Dirk Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Addition of whole-brain irradiation (WBI) to radiosurgery for treatment of few cerebral metastases is controversial. This study aimed to create an instrument that estimates the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery to facilitate the decision regarding additional WBI. METHODS: Nine characteristics were investigated for associations with the development of new cerebral metastases including radiosurgery dose (dose equivalent to <20 Gy vs. 20 Gy vs. >20 Gy for tumor cell kill, prescribed to the 73-90% isodose level), age (≤60 vs. ≥61 years), gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (0-1 vs. 2), primary tumor type (breast cancer vs. non-small lung cancer vs. malignant melanoma vs. others), number/size of cerebral metastases (1 lesion <15 mm vs. 1 lesion ≥15 mm vs. 2 or 3 lesions), location of the cerebral metastases (supratentorial alone vs. infratentorial ± supratentorial), extra-cerebra metastases (no vs. yes) and time between first diagnosis of the primary tumor and radiosurgery (≤15 vs. >15 months). RESULTS: Number of cerebral metastases (p = 0.002), primary tumor type (p = 0.10) and extra-cerebral metastases (p = 0.06) showed significant associations with development of new cerebral metastases or a trend, and were integrated into the predictive instrument. Scoring points were calculated from 6-months freedom from new cerebral metastases rates. Three groups were formed, group I (16-17 points, N = 47), group II (18-20 points, N = 120) and group III (21-22 points, N = 47). Six-month rates of freedom from new cerebral metastases were 36%, 65% and 80%, respectively (p < 0.001). Corresponding rates at 12 months were 27%, 44% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This new instrument enables the physician to estimate the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone. Patients of groups I and II appear good candidates for additional WBI in addition to radiosurgery, whereas patients of group III may not require WBI in addition to radiosurgery. BioMed Central 2014-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4262235/ /pubmed/25240823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-215 Text en © Huttenlocher et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Huttenlocher, Stefan Dziggel, Liesa Hornung, Dagmar Blanck, Oliver Schild, Steven E Rades, Dirk A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
title | A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
title_full | A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
title_fullStr | A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
title_full_unstemmed | A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
title_short | A new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
title_sort | new prognostic instrument to predict the probability of developing new cerebral metastases after radiosurgery alone |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25240823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huttenlocherstefan anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT dziggelliesa anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT hornungdagmar anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT blanckoliver anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT schildstevene anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT radesdirk anewprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT huttenlocherstefan newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT dziggelliesa newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT hornungdagmar newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT blanckoliver newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT schildstevene newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone AT radesdirk newprognosticinstrumenttopredicttheprobabilityofdevelopingnewcerebralmetastasesafterradiosurgeryalone |