Cargando…

Brain Cancer in Workers Employed at a Laboratory Research Facility

BACKGROUND: An earlier study of research facility workers found more brain cancer deaths than expected, but no workplace exposures were implicated. METHODS: Adding four additional years of vital-status follow-up, we reassessed the risk of death from brain cancer in the same workforce, including 5,28...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, James J., Bender, Thomas John, Bonner, Eileen M., Bodner, Kenneth M., Kreft, Alisa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113997
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: An earlier study of research facility workers found more brain cancer deaths than expected, but no workplace exposures were implicated. METHODS: Adding four additional years of vital-status follow-up, we reassessed the risk of death from brain cancer in the same workforce, including 5,284 workers employed between 1963, when the facility opened, and 2007. We compared the work histories of the brain cancer decedents in relationship to when they died and their ages at death. RESULTS: As in most other studies of laboratory and research workers, we found low rates of total mortality, total cancers, accidents, suicides, and chronic conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. We found no new brain cancer deaths in the four years of additional follow-up. Our best estimate of the brain cancer standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.66–2.37), but the SMR might have been as high as 1.69. Deaths from benign brain tumors and other non-malignant diseases of the nervous system were at or below expected levels. CONCLUSION: With the addition of four more years of follow-up and in the absence of any new brain cancers, the updated estimate of the risk of brain cancer death is smaller than in the original study. There was no consistent pattern among the work histories of decedents that indicated a common causative exposure.