Cargando…
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
Statistical analysis is error prone. A best practice for researchers using statistics would therefore be to share data among co-authors, allowing double-checking of executed tasks just as co-pilots do in aviation. To document the extent to which this ‘co-piloting’ currently occurs in psychology, we...
Autores principales: | Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., Nuijten, Michèle B., Dominguez-Alvarez, Linda, van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., Wicherts, Jelte M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114876 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)
por: Nuijten, Michèle B., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology
por: Maassen, Esther, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
por: van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2011)