Cargando…

Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia

BACKGROUND: Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakai, Eiji, Endo, Hiroki, Taguri, Masataka, Kawamura, Harunobu, Taniguchi, Leo, Hata, Yasuo, Ezuka, Akiko, Nagase, Hajime, Kessoku, Takaomi, Ishii, Ken, Arimoto, Jun, Yamada, Eiji, Ohkubo, Hidenori, Higurashi, Takuma, Koide, Tomoko, Nonaka, Takashi, Takahashi, Hirokazu, Nakajima, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25430814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3
_version_ 1782348487403241472
author Sakai, Eiji
Endo, Hiroki
Taguri, Masataka
Kawamura, Harunobu
Taniguchi, Leo
Hata, Yasuo
Ezuka, Akiko
Nagase, Hajime
Kessoku, Takaomi
Ishii, Ken
Arimoto, Jun
Yamada, Eiji
Ohkubo, Hidenori
Higurashi, Takuma
Koide, Tomoko
Nonaka, Takashi
Takahashi, Hirokazu
Nakajima, Atsushi
author_facet Sakai, Eiji
Endo, Hiroki
Taguri, Masataka
Kawamura, Harunobu
Taniguchi, Leo
Hata, Yasuo
Ezuka, Akiko
Nagase, Hajime
Kessoku, Takaomi
Ishii, Ken
Arimoto, Jun
Yamada, Eiji
Ohkubo, Hidenori
Higurashi, Takuma
Koide, Tomoko
Nonaka, Takashi
Takahashi, Hirokazu
Nakajima, Atsushi
author_sort Sakai, Eiji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small bowel angioectasia. METHODS: A total of 68 patients were retrospectively included in this study. All the patients had undergone CE examination, and subsequent control of bleeding, where needed, was accomplished by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. Based on the follow-up data, the rebleeding rate was compared between patients who had/had not undergone endoscopic treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify the predictors of rebleeding. We defined the OGIB as controlled if there was no further overt bleeding within 6 months and the hemoglobin level had not fallen below 10 g/dl by the time of the final examination. RESULTS: The overall rebleeding rate over a median follow-up duration of 30.5 months (interquartile range 16.5–47.0) was 33.8% (23/68 cases). The cumulative risk of rebleeding tended to be lower in the patients who had undergone endoscopic treatment than in those who had not undergone endoscopic treatment, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). In the majority of patients with rebleeding (18/23, 78.3%), the bleeding was controlled by the end of the follow-up period. Multiple regression analysis identified presence of multiple lesions (≥3) (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.30–11.3, P = 0.02) as the only significant independent predictor of rebleeding. CONCLUSION: In most cases, bleeding can be controlled by repeated endoscopic treatment. Careful follow-up is needed for patients with multiple lesions, presence of which is considered as a significant risk factor for rebleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4262995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42629952014-12-12 Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia Sakai, Eiji Endo, Hiroki Taguri, Masataka Kawamura, Harunobu Taniguchi, Leo Hata, Yasuo Ezuka, Akiko Nagase, Hajime Kessoku, Takaomi Ishii, Ken Arimoto, Jun Yamada, Eiji Ohkubo, Hidenori Higurashi, Takuma Koide, Tomoko Nonaka, Takashi Takahashi, Hirokazu Nakajima, Atsushi BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small bowel angioectasia. METHODS: A total of 68 patients were retrospectively included in this study. All the patients had undergone CE examination, and subsequent control of bleeding, where needed, was accomplished by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. Based on the follow-up data, the rebleeding rate was compared between patients who had/had not undergone endoscopic treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify the predictors of rebleeding. We defined the OGIB as controlled if there was no further overt bleeding within 6 months and the hemoglobin level had not fallen below 10 g/dl by the time of the final examination. RESULTS: The overall rebleeding rate over a median follow-up duration of 30.5 months (interquartile range 16.5–47.0) was 33.8% (23/68 cases). The cumulative risk of rebleeding tended to be lower in the patients who had undergone endoscopic treatment than in those who had not undergone endoscopic treatment, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). In the majority of patients with rebleeding (18/23, 78.3%), the bleeding was controlled by the end of the follow-up period. Multiple regression analysis identified presence of multiple lesions (≥3) (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.30–11.3, P = 0.02) as the only significant independent predictor of rebleeding. CONCLUSION: In most cases, bleeding can be controlled by repeated endoscopic treatment. Careful follow-up is needed for patients with multiple lesions, presence of which is considered as a significant risk factor for rebleeding. BioMed Central 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4262995/ /pubmed/25430814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3 Text en © Sakai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sakai, Eiji
Endo, Hiroki
Taguri, Masataka
Kawamura, Harunobu
Taniguchi, Leo
Hata, Yasuo
Ezuka, Akiko
Nagase, Hajime
Kessoku, Takaomi
Ishii, Ken
Arimoto, Jun
Yamada, Eiji
Ohkubo, Hidenori
Higurashi, Takuma
Koide, Tomoko
Nonaka, Takashi
Takahashi, Hirokazu
Nakajima, Atsushi
Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
title Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
title_full Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
title_fullStr Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
title_full_unstemmed Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
title_short Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
title_sort frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25430814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaieiji frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT endohiroki frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT tagurimasataka frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT kawamuraharunobu frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT taniguchileo frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT hatayasuo frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT ezukaakiko frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT nagasehajime frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT kessokutakaomi frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT ishiiken frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT arimotojun frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT yamadaeiji frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT ohkubohidenori frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT higurashitakuma frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT koidetomoko frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT nonakatakashi frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT takahashihirokazu frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia
AT nakajimaatsushi frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia