Cargando…
Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia
BACKGROUND: Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25430814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3 |
_version_ | 1782348487403241472 |
---|---|
author | Sakai, Eiji Endo, Hiroki Taguri, Masataka Kawamura, Harunobu Taniguchi, Leo Hata, Yasuo Ezuka, Akiko Nagase, Hajime Kessoku, Takaomi Ishii, Ken Arimoto, Jun Yamada, Eiji Ohkubo, Hidenori Higurashi, Takuma Koide, Tomoko Nonaka, Takashi Takahashi, Hirokazu Nakajima, Atsushi |
author_facet | Sakai, Eiji Endo, Hiroki Taguri, Masataka Kawamura, Harunobu Taniguchi, Leo Hata, Yasuo Ezuka, Akiko Nagase, Hajime Kessoku, Takaomi Ishii, Ken Arimoto, Jun Yamada, Eiji Ohkubo, Hidenori Higurashi, Takuma Koide, Tomoko Nonaka, Takashi Takahashi, Hirokazu Nakajima, Atsushi |
author_sort | Sakai, Eiji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small bowel angioectasia. METHODS: A total of 68 patients were retrospectively included in this study. All the patients had undergone CE examination, and subsequent control of bleeding, where needed, was accomplished by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. Based on the follow-up data, the rebleeding rate was compared between patients who had/had not undergone endoscopic treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify the predictors of rebleeding. We defined the OGIB as controlled if there was no further overt bleeding within 6 months and the hemoglobin level had not fallen below 10 g/dl by the time of the final examination. RESULTS: The overall rebleeding rate over a median follow-up duration of 30.5 months (interquartile range 16.5–47.0) was 33.8% (23/68 cases). The cumulative risk of rebleeding tended to be lower in the patients who had undergone endoscopic treatment than in those who had not undergone endoscopic treatment, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). In the majority of patients with rebleeding (18/23, 78.3%), the bleeding was controlled by the end of the follow-up period. Multiple regression analysis identified presence of multiple lesions (≥3) (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.30–11.3, P = 0.02) as the only significant independent predictor of rebleeding. CONCLUSION: In most cases, bleeding can be controlled by repeated endoscopic treatment. Careful follow-up is needed for patients with multiple lesions, presence of which is considered as a significant risk factor for rebleeding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4262995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42629952014-12-12 Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia Sakai, Eiji Endo, Hiroki Taguri, Masataka Kawamura, Harunobu Taniguchi, Leo Hata, Yasuo Ezuka, Akiko Nagase, Hajime Kessoku, Takaomi Ishii, Ken Arimoto, Jun Yamada, Eiji Ohkubo, Hidenori Higurashi, Takuma Koide, Tomoko Nonaka, Takashi Takahashi, Hirokazu Nakajima, Atsushi BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small bowel angioectasia. METHODS: A total of 68 patients were retrospectively included in this study. All the patients had undergone CE examination, and subsequent control of bleeding, where needed, was accomplished by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. Based on the follow-up data, the rebleeding rate was compared between patients who had/had not undergone endoscopic treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify the predictors of rebleeding. We defined the OGIB as controlled if there was no further overt bleeding within 6 months and the hemoglobin level had not fallen below 10 g/dl by the time of the final examination. RESULTS: The overall rebleeding rate over a median follow-up duration of 30.5 months (interquartile range 16.5–47.0) was 33.8% (23/68 cases). The cumulative risk of rebleeding tended to be lower in the patients who had undergone endoscopic treatment than in those who had not undergone endoscopic treatment, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). In the majority of patients with rebleeding (18/23, 78.3%), the bleeding was controlled by the end of the follow-up period. Multiple regression analysis identified presence of multiple lesions (≥3) (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.30–11.3, P = 0.02) as the only significant independent predictor of rebleeding. CONCLUSION: In most cases, bleeding can be controlled by repeated endoscopic treatment. Careful follow-up is needed for patients with multiple lesions, presence of which is considered as a significant risk factor for rebleeding. BioMed Central 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4262995/ /pubmed/25430814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3 Text en © Sakai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sakai, Eiji Endo, Hiroki Taguri, Masataka Kawamura, Harunobu Taniguchi, Leo Hata, Yasuo Ezuka, Akiko Nagase, Hajime Kessoku, Takaomi Ishii, Ken Arimoto, Jun Yamada, Eiji Ohkubo, Hidenori Higurashi, Takuma Koide, Tomoko Nonaka, Takashi Takahashi, Hirokazu Nakajima, Atsushi Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
title | Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
title_full | Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
title_fullStr | Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
title_short | Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
title_sort | frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25430814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakaieiji frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT endohiroki frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT tagurimasataka frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT kawamuraharunobu frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT taniguchileo frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT hatayasuo frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT ezukaakiko frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT nagasehajime frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT kessokutakaomi frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT ishiiken frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT arimotojun frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT yamadaeiji frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT ohkubohidenori frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT higurashitakuma frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT koidetomoko frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT nonakatakashi frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT takahashihirokazu frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia AT nakajimaatsushi frequencyandriskfactorsforrebleedingeventsinpatientswithsmallbowelangioectasia |