Cargando…
Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
BACKGROUND: Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for F...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436 |
_version_ | 1782348502768025600 |
---|---|
author | Finch, Tracy L Bamford, Claire Deary, Vincent Sabin, Neil Parry, Steve W |
author_facet | Finch, Tracy L Bamford, Claire Deary, Vincent Sabin, Neil Parry, Steve W |
author_sort | Finch, Tracy L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for FoF. METHODS: The process evaluation of the CBTi development phase of an RCT (conducted in the UK) reported here, used ethnographic methods. Data included: interviews with patients and carers (n = 16), clinic staff (n = 6) and the psychologists developing the CBTi (n = 3); observational field notes and transcripts of intervention development meetings (n = 9) and stakeholder engagement meetings (n = 2); and informal discussions with staff developing the CBTi (n = 8). Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). RESULTS: The process evaluation showed two domains of work necessary to develop a CBTi that made sense to stakeholders, and that could be delivered as part of an RCT. For the psychologists developing the content of the CBTi, a growing understanding of the complexity of FoF highlighted the need for an individualised rather than a manualised intervention. For the research team, the work involved adapting the structures and processes of the RCT to address preliminary concerns over the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed CBTi. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based approaches to process evaluation can sensitise researchers to contested understandings about proposed interventions that could undermine implementation. Drawing on the coherence construct of NPT, this study emphasises the nature and extent of work required to ensure an intervention makes sufficient sense to key stakeholders in order to maximise chances of successful implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-436) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4263069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42630692014-12-12 Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development Finch, Tracy L Bamford, Claire Deary, Vincent Sabin, Neil Parry, Steve W BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for FoF. METHODS: The process evaluation of the CBTi development phase of an RCT (conducted in the UK) reported here, used ethnographic methods. Data included: interviews with patients and carers (n = 16), clinic staff (n = 6) and the psychologists developing the CBTi (n = 3); observational field notes and transcripts of intervention development meetings (n = 9) and stakeholder engagement meetings (n = 2); and informal discussions with staff developing the CBTi (n = 8). Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). RESULTS: The process evaluation showed two domains of work necessary to develop a CBTi that made sense to stakeholders, and that could be delivered as part of an RCT. For the psychologists developing the content of the CBTi, a growing understanding of the complexity of FoF highlighted the need for an individualised rather than a manualised intervention. For the research team, the work involved adapting the structures and processes of the RCT to address preliminary concerns over the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed CBTi. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based approaches to process evaluation can sensitise researchers to contested understandings about proposed interventions that could undermine implementation. Drawing on the coherence construct of NPT, this study emphasises the nature and extent of work required to ensure an intervention makes sufficient sense to key stakeholders in order to maximise chances of successful implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-436) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4263069/ /pubmed/25252807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436 Text en © Finch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Finch, Tracy L Bamford, Claire Deary, Vincent Sabin, Neil Parry, Steve W Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
title | Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
title_full | Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
title_fullStr | Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
title_full_unstemmed | Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
title_short | Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
title_sort | making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finchtracyl makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment AT bamfordclaire makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment AT dearyvincent makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment AT sabinneil makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment AT parrystevew makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment |