Cargando…

Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development

BACKGROUND: Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finch, Tracy L, Bamford, Claire, Deary, Vincent, Sabin, Neil, Parry, Steve W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436
_version_ 1782348502768025600
author Finch, Tracy L
Bamford, Claire
Deary, Vincent
Sabin, Neil
Parry, Steve W
author_facet Finch, Tracy L
Bamford, Claire
Deary, Vincent
Sabin, Neil
Parry, Steve W
author_sort Finch, Tracy L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for FoF. METHODS: The process evaluation of the CBTi development phase of an RCT (conducted in the UK) reported here, used ethnographic methods. Data included: interviews with patients and carers (n = 16), clinic staff (n = 6) and the psychologists developing the CBTi (n = 3); observational field notes and transcripts of intervention development meetings (n = 9) and stakeholder engagement meetings (n = 2); and informal discussions with staff developing the CBTi (n = 8). Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). RESULTS: The process evaluation showed two domains of work necessary to develop a CBTi that made sense to stakeholders, and that could be delivered as part of an RCT. For the psychologists developing the content of the CBTi, a growing understanding of the complexity of FoF highlighted the need for an individualised rather than a manualised intervention. For the research team, the work involved adapting the structures and processes of the RCT to address preliminary concerns over the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed CBTi. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based approaches to process evaluation can sensitise researchers to contested understandings about proposed interventions that could undermine implementation. Drawing on the coherence construct of NPT, this study emphasises the nature and extent of work required to ensure an intervention makes sufficient sense to key stakeholders in order to maximise chances of successful implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-436) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4263069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42630692014-12-12 Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development Finch, Tracy L Bamford, Claire Deary, Vincent Sabin, Neil Parry, Steve W BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Fear of Falling (FoF) is commonly reported among older adults (up to 50%) and can impact negatively on physical and social activities, mood and quality of life. This paper explores the development, acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBTi) for FoF. METHODS: The process evaluation of the CBTi development phase of an RCT (conducted in the UK) reported here, used ethnographic methods. Data included: interviews with patients and carers (n = 16), clinic staff (n = 6) and the psychologists developing the CBTi (n = 3); observational field notes and transcripts of intervention development meetings (n = 9) and stakeholder engagement meetings (n = 2); and informal discussions with staff developing the CBTi (n = 8). Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). RESULTS: The process evaluation showed two domains of work necessary to develop a CBTi that made sense to stakeholders, and that could be delivered as part of an RCT. For the psychologists developing the content of the CBTi, a growing understanding of the complexity of FoF highlighted the need for an individualised rather than a manualised intervention. For the research team, the work involved adapting the structures and processes of the RCT to address preliminary concerns over the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed CBTi. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based approaches to process evaluation can sensitise researchers to contested understandings about proposed interventions that could undermine implementation. Drawing on the coherence construct of NPT, this study emphasises the nature and extent of work required to ensure an intervention makes sufficient sense to key stakeholders in order to maximise chances of successful implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-436) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4263069/ /pubmed/25252807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436 Text en © Finch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Finch, Tracy L
Bamford, Claire
Deary, Vincent
Sabin, Neil
Parry, Steve W
Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
title Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
title_full Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
title_fullStr Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
title_full_unstemmed Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
title_short Making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
title_sort making sense of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fear of falling: qualitative study of intervention development
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-436
work_keys_str_mv AT finchtracyl makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment
AT bamfordclaire makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment
AT dearyvincent makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment
AT sabinneil makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment
AT parrystevew makingsenseofacognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionforfearoffallingqualitativestudyofinterventiondevelopment