Cargando…
How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector?
BACKGROUND: The opportunity to integrate vector management across multiple vector-borne diseases is particularly plausible for malaria and lymphatic filariasis (LF) control where both diseases are transmitted by the same vector. To date most examples of integrated control targeting these diseases ha...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003393 |
_version_ | 1782348563136643072 |
---|---|
author | Stone, Christopher M. Lindsay, Steve W. Chitnis, Nakul |
author_facet | Stone, Christopher M. Lindsay, Steve W. Chitnis, Nakul |
author_sort | Stone, Christopher M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The opportunity to integrate vector management across multiple vector-borne diseases is particularly plausible for malaria and lymphatic filariasis (LF) control where both diseases are transmitted by the same vector. To date most examples of integrated control targeting these diseases have been unanticipated consequences of malaria vector control, rather than planned strategies that aim to maximize the efficacy and take the complex ecological and biological interactions between the two diseases into account. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We developed a general model of malaria and LF transmission and derived expressions for the basic reproductive number (R(0)) for each disease. Transmission of both diseases was most sensitive to vector mortality and biting rate. Simulating different levels of coverage of long lasting-insecticidal nets (LLINs) and larval control confirms the effectiveness of these interventions for the control of both diseases. When LF was maintained near the critical density of mosquitoes, minor levels of vector control (8% coverage of LLINs or treatment of 20% of larval sites) were sufficient to eliminate the disease. Malaria had a far greater R(0) and required a 90% population coverage of LLINs in order to eliminate it. When the mosquito density was doubled, 36% and 58% coverage of LLINs and larval control, respectively, were required for LF elimination; and malaria elimination was possible with a combined coverage of 78% of LLINs and larval control. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the low level of vector control required to eliminate LF, simulations suggest that prevalence of LF will decrease at a slower rate than malaria, even at high levels of coverage. If representative of field situations, integrated management should take into account not only how malaria control can facilitate filariasis elimination, but strike a balance between the high levels of coverage of (multiple) interventions required for malaria with the long duration predicted to be required for filariasis elimination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4263402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42634022014-12-19 How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? Stone, Christopher M. Lindsay, Steve W. Chitnis, Nakul PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The opportunity to integrate vector management across multiple vector-borne diseases is particularly plausible for malaria and lymphatic filariasis (LF) control where both diseases are transmitted by the same vector. To date most examples of integrated control targeting these diseases have been unanticipated consequences of malaria vector control, rather than planned strategies that aim to maximize the efficacy and take the complex ecological and biological interactions between the two diseases into account. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We developed a general model of malaria and LF transmission and derived expressions for the basic reproductive number (R(0)) for each disease. Transmission of both diseases was most sensitive to vector mortality and biting rate. Simulating different levels of coverage of long lasting-insecticidal nets (LLINs) and larval control confirms the effectiveness of these interventions for the control of both diseases. When LF was maintained near the critical density of mosquitoes, minor levels of vector control (8% coverage of LLINs or treatment of 20% of larval sites) were sufficient to eliminate the disease. Malaria had a far greater R(0) and required a 90% population coverage of LLINs in order to eliminate it. When the mosquito density was doubled, 36% and 58% coverage of LLINs and larval control, respectively, were required for LF elimination; and malaria elimination was possible with a combined coverage of 78% of LLINs and larval control. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the low level of vector control required to eliminate LF, simulations suggest that prevalence of LF will decrease at a slower rate than malaria, even at high levels of coverage. If representative of field situations, integrated management should take into account not only how malaria control can facilitate filariasis elimination, but strike a balance between the high levels of coverage of (multiple) interventions required for malaria with the long duration predicted to be required for filariasis elimination. Public Library of Science 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4263402/ /pubmed/25501002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003393 Text en © 2014 Stone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stone, Christopher M. Lindsay, Steve W. Chitnis, Nakul How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? |
title | How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? |
title_full | How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? |
title_fullStr | How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? |
title_short | How Effective is Integrated Vector Management Against Malaria and Lymphatic Filariasis Where the Diseases Are Transmitted by the Same Vector? |
title_sort | how effective is integrated vector management against malaria and lymphatic filariasis where the diseases are transmitted by the same vector? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003393 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stonechristopherm howeffectiveisintegratedvectormanagementagainstmalariaandlymphaticfilariasiswherethediseasesaretransmittedbythesamevector AT lindsaystevew howeffectiveisintegratedvectormanagementagainstmalariaandlymphaticfilariasiswherethediseasesaretransmittedbythesamevector AT chitnisnakul howeffectiveisintegratedvectormanagementagainstmalariaandlymphaticfilariasiswherethediseasesaretransmittedbythesamevector |