Cargando…
Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify olde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25503576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115060 |
_version_ | 1782348623721267200 |
---|---|
author | Soubeyran, Pierre Bellera, Carine Goyard, Jean Heitz, Damien Curé, Hervé Rousselot, Hubert Albrand, Gilles Servent, Véronique Jean, Olivier Saint van Praagh, Isabelle Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel Périn, Stéphane Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc Terret, Catherine Desauw, Christophe Girre, Véronique Mertens, Cécile Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone Rainfray, Muriel |
author_facet | Soubeyran, Pierre Bellera, Carine Goyard, Jean Heitz, Damien Curé, Hervé Rousselot, Hubert Albrand, Gilles Servent, Véronique Jean, Olivier Saint van Praagh, Isabelle Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel Périn, Stéphane Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc Terret, Catherine Desauw, Christophe Girre, Véronique Mertens, Cécile Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone Rainfray, Muriel |
author_sort | Soubeyran, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment by comparing the performance of two short assessment tools the G8 and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 and the (VES-13) were evaluated in a prospective cohort study of 1674 cancer patients accrued before treatment in 23 health care facilities. 1435 were eligible and evaluable. Outcome measures were multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA), sensitivity (primary), specificity, negative and positive predictive values and likelihood ratios of the G8 and VES-13, and predictive factors of 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: Patient median age was 78.2 years (70-98) with a majority of females (69.8%), various types of cancer including 53.9% breast, and 75.8% Performance Status 0-1. Impaired MGA, G8, and VES-13 were 80.2%, 68.4%, and 60.2%, respectively. Mean time to complete G8 or VES-13 was about five minutes. Reproducibility of the two questionnaires was good. G8 appeared more sensitive (76.5% versus 68.7%, P = 0.0046) whereas VES-13 was more specific (74.3% versus 64.4%, P<0.0001). Abnormal G8 score (HR = 2.72), advanced stage (HR = 3.30), male sex (HR = 2.69) and poor Performance Status (HR = 3.28) were independent prognostic factors of 1-year survival. CONCLUSION: With good sensitivity and independent prognostic value on 1-year survival, the G8 questionnaire is currently one of the best screening tools available to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment, and we believe it should be implemented broadly in daily practice. Continuous research efforts should be pursued to refine the selection process of older cancer patients before potentially life-threatening therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4263738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42637382014-12-19 Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study Soubeyran, Pierre Bellera, Carine Goyard, Jean Heitz, Damien Curé, Hervé Rousselot, Hubert Albrand, Gilles Servent, Véronique Jean, Olivier Saint van Praagh, Isabelle Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel Périn, Stéphane Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc Terret, Catherine Desauw, Christophe Girre, Véronique Mertens, Cécile Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone Rainfray, Muriel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment by comparing the performance of two short assessment tools the G8 and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 and the (VES-13) were evaluated in a prospective cohort study of 1674 cancer patients accrued before treatment in 23 health care facilities. 1435 were eligible and evaluable. Outcome measures were multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA), sensitivity (primary), specificity, negative and positive predictive values and likelihood ratios of the G8 and VES-13, and predictive factors of 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: Patient median age was 78.2 years (70-98) with a majority of females (69.8%), various types of cancer including 53.9% breast, and 75.8% Performance Status 0-1. Impaired MGA, G8, and VES-13 were 80.2%, 68.4%, and 60.2%, respectively. Mean time to complete G8 or VES-13 was about five minutes. Reproducibility of the two questionnaires was good. G8 appeared more sensitive (76.5% versus 68.7%, P = 0.0046) whereas VES-13 was more specific (74.3% versus 64.4%, P<0.0001). Abnormal G8 score (HR = 2.72), advanced stage (HR = 3.30), male sex (HR = 2.69) and poor Performance Status (HR = 3.28) were independent prognostic factors of 1-year survival. CONCLUSION: With good sensitivity and independent prognostic value on 1-year survival, the G8 questionnaire is currently one of the best screening tools available to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment, and we believe it should be implemented broadly in daily practice. Continuous research efforts should be pursued to refine the selection process of older cancer patients before potentially life-threatening therapy. Public Library of Science 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4263738/ /pubmed/25503576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115060 Text en © 2014 Soubeyran et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Soubeyran, Pierre Bellera, Carine Goyard, Jean Heitz, Damien Curé, Hervé Rousselot, Hubert Albrand, Gilles Servent, Véronique Jean, Olivier Saint van Praagh, Isabelle Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel Périn, Stéphane Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc Terret, Catherine Desauw, Christophe Girre, Véronique Mertens, Cécile Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone Rainfray, Muriel Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study |
title | Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study |
title_full | Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study |
title_short | Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study |
title_sort | screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the oncodage prospective multicenter cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25503576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soubeyranpierre screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT belleracarine screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT goyardjean screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT heitzdamien screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT cureherve screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT rousselothubert screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT albrandgilles screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT serventveronique screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT jeanoliviersaint screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT vanpraaghisabelle screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT kurtzjeanemmanuel screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT perinstephane screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT verhaeghejeanluc screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT terretcatherine screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT desauwchristophe screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT girreveronique screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT mertenscecile screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT mathoulinpelissiersimone screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT rainfraymuriel screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy |