Cargando…

Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify olde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soubeyran, Pierre, Bellera, Carine, Goyard, Jean, Heitz, Damien, Curé, Hervé, Rousselot, Hubert, Albrand, Gilles, Servent, Véronique, Jean, Olivier Saint, van Praagh, Isabelle, Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel, Périn, Stéphane, Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc, Terret, Catherine, Desauw, Christophe, Girre, Véronique, Mertens, Cécile, Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone, Rainfray, Muriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25503576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115060
_version_ 1782348623721267200
author Soubeyran, Pierre
Bellera, Carine
Goyard, Jean
Heitz, Damien
Curé, Hervé
Rousselot, Hubert
Albrand, Gilles
Servent, Véronique
Jean, Olivier Saint
van Praagh, Isabelle
Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel
Périn, Stéphane
Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc
Terret, Catherine
Desauw, Christophe
Girre, Véronique
Mertens, Cécile
Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone
Rainfray, Muriel
author_facet Soubeyran, Pierre
Bellera, Carine
Goyard, Jean
Heitz, Damien
Curé, Hervé
Rousselot, Hubert
Albrand, Gilles
Servent, Véronique
Jean, Olivier Saint
van Praagh, Isabelle
Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel
Périn, Stéphane
Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc
Terret, Catherine
Desauw, Christophe
Girre, Véronique
Mertens, Cécile
Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone
Rainfray, Muriel
author_sort Soubeyran, Pierre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment by comparing the performance of two short assessment tools the G8 and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 and the (VES-13) were evaluated in a prospective cohort study of 1674 cancer patients accrued before treatment in 23 health care facilities. 1435 were eligible and evaluable. Outcome measures were multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA), sensitivity (primary), specificity, negative and positive predictive values and likelihood ratios of the G8 and VES-13, and predictive factors of 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: Patient median age was 78.2 years (70-98) with a majority of females (69.8%), various types of cancer including 53.9% breast, and 75.8% Performance Status 0-1. Impaired MGA, G8, and VES-13 were 80.2%, 68.4%, and 60.2%, respectively. Mean time to complete G8 or VES-13 was about five minutes. Reproducibility of the two questionnaires was good. G8 appeared more sensitive (76.5% versus 68.7%, P =  0.0046) whereas VES-13 was more specific (74.3% versus 64.4%, P<0.0001). Abnormal G8 score (HR = 2.72), advanced stage (HR = 3.30), male sex (HR = 2.69) and poor Performance Status (HR = 3.28) were independent prognostic factors of 1-year survival. CONCLUSION: With good sensitivity and independent prognostic value on 1-year survival, the G8 questionnaire is currently one of the best screening tools available to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment, and we believe it should be implemented broadly in daily practice. Continuous research efforts should be pursued to refine the selection process of older cancer patients before potentially life-threatening therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4263738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42637382014-12-19 Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study Soubeyran, Pierre Bellera, Carine Goyard, Jean Heitz, Damien Curé, Hervé Rousselot, Hubert Albrand, Gilles Servent, Véronique Jean, Olivier Saint van Praagh, Isabelle Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel Périn, Stéphane Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc Terret, Catherine Desauw, Christophe Girre, Véronique Mertens, Cécile Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone Rainfray, Muriel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment by comparing the performance of two short assessment tools the G8 and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 and the (VES-13) were evaluated in a prospective cohort study of 1674 cancer patients accrued before treatment in 23 health care facilities. 1435 were eligible and evaluable. Outcome measures were multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA), sensitivity (primary), specificity, negative and positive predictive values and likelihood ratios of the G8 and VES-13, and predictive factors of 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: Patient median age was 78.2 years (70-98) with a majority of females (69.8%), various types of cancer including 53.9% breast, and 75.8% Performance Status 0-1. Impaired MGA, G8, and VES-13 were 80.2%, 68.4%, and 60.2%, respectively. Mean time to complete G8 or VES-13 was about five minutes. Reproducibility of the two questionnaires was good. G8 appeared more sensitive (76.5% versus 68.7%, P =  0.0046) whereas VES-13 was more specific (74.3% versus 64.4%, P<0.0001). Abnormal G8 score (HR = 2.72), advanced stage (HR = 3.30), male sex (HR = 2.69) and poor Performance Status (HR = 3.28) were independent prognostic factors of 1-year survival. CONCLUSION: With good sensitivity and independent prognostic value on 1-year survival, the G8 questionnaire is currently one of the best screening tools available to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment, and we believe it should be implemented broadly in daily practice. Continuous research efforts should be pursued to refine the selection process of older cancer patients before potentially life-threatening therapy. Public Library of Science 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4263738/ /pubmed/25503576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115060 Text en © 2014 Soubeyran et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soubeyran, Pierre
Bellera, Carine
Goyard, Jean
Heitz, Damien
Curé, Hervé
Rousselot, Hubert
Albrand, Gilles
Servent, Véronique
Jean, Olivier Saint
van Praagh, Isabelle
Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel
Périn, Stéphane
Verhaeghe, Jean-Luc
Terret, Catherine
Desauw, Christophe
Girre, Véronique
Mertens, Cécile
Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone
Rainfray, Muriel
Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
title Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
title_full Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
title_fullStr Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
title_short Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
title_sort screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the oncodage prospective multicenter cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25503576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115060
work_keys_str_mv AT soubeyranpierre screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT belleracarine screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT goyardjean screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT heitzdamien screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT cureherve screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT rousselothubert screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT albrandgilles screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT serventveronique screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT jeanoliviersaint screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT vanpraaghisabelle screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT kurtzjeanemmanuel screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT perinstephane screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT verhaeghejeanluc screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT terretcatherine screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT desauwchristophe screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT girreveronique screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT mertenscecile screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT mathoulinpelissiersimone screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT rainfraymuriel screeningforvulnerabilityinoldercancerpatientstheoncodageprospectivemulticentercohortstudy