Cargando…

Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors

BACKGROUND: Many different components factor into the final grade assigned for the internal medicine clerkship. Failure of one or more of these requires consideration of remedial measures. PURPOSE: To determine which assessment components are used to assign students a passing grade for the clerkship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthorne, Mary R., Chretien, Katherine C., Torre, Dario, Chheda, Shobhina G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25500150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25991
_version_ 1782348646088441856
author Hawthorne, Mary R.
Chretien, Katherine C.
Torre, Dario
Chheda, Shobhina G.
author_facet Hawthorne, Mary R.
Chretien, Katherine C.
Torre, Dario
Chheda, Shobhina G.
author_sort Hawthorne, Mary R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many different components factor into the final grade assigned for the internal medicine clerkship. Failure of one or more of these requires consideration of remedial measures. PURPOSE: To determine which assessment components are used to assign students a passing grade for the clerkship and what remediation measures are required when students do not pass a component. METHODS: A national cross-sectional survey of Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) institutional members was conducted in April 2011. The survey included sections on remediation, grading practices, and demographics. The authors analyzed responses using descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Response rate was 73% (86/113). Medicine clerkships required students to pass the following components: clinical evaluations 83 (97%), NBME subject exam 76 (88%), written assignments 40 (46%), OSCE 35 (41%), in-house written exam 23 (27%), and mini-CEX 19 (22%). When students failed a component of the clerkship for the first time, 55 schools (64%) simply allowed students to make up the component, while only 16 (18%) allowed a simple make-up for a second failure. Additional ward time was required by 24 schools (28%) for a first-time failure of one component of the clerkship and by 49 (57%) for a second failure. The presence or absence of true remedial measures in a school was not associated with clerkship director academic rank, grading scheme, or percent of students who failed the clerkship in the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Most schools required passing clinical evaluations and NBME subject exam components to pass the medicine clerkship, but there was variability in other requirements. Most schools allowed students to simply re-take the component for a first-time failure. This study raises the question of whether true remediation is being undertaken before students are asked to re-demonstrate competence in a failed area of the clerkship to be ready for the subinternship level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4263902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42639022015-01-07 Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors Hawthorne, Mary R. Chretien, Katherine C. Torre, Dario Chheda, Shobhina G. Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: Many different components factor into the final grade assigned for the internal medicine clerkship. Failure of one or more of these requires consideration of remedial measures. PURPOSE: To determine which assessment components are used to assign students a passing grade for the clerkship and what remediation measures are required when students do not pass a component. METHODS: A national cross-sectional survey of Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) institutional members was conducted in April 2011. The survey included sections on remediation, grading practices, and demographics. The authors analyzed responses using descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Response rate was 73% (86/113). Medicine clerkships required students to pass the following components: clinical evaluations 83 (97%), NBME subject exam 76 (88%), written assignments 40 (46%), OSCE 35 (41%), in-house written exam 23 (27%), and mini-CEX 19 (22%). When students failed a component of the clerkship for the first time, 55 schools (64%) simply allowed students to make up the component, while only 16 (18%) allowed a simple make-up for a second failure. Additional ward time was required by 24 schools (28%) for a first-time failure of one component of the clerkship and by 49 (57%) for a second failure. The presence or absence of true remedial measures in a school was not associated with clerkship director academic rank, grading scheme, or percent of students who failed the clerkship in the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Most schools required passing clinical evaluations and NBME subject exam components to pass the medicine clerkship, but there was variability in other requirements. Most schools allowed students to simply re-take the component for a first-time failure. This study raises the question of whether true remediation is being undertaken before students are asked to re-demonstrate competence in a failed area of the clerkship to be ready for the subinternship level. Co-Action Publishing 2014-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4263902/ /pubmed/25500150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25991 Text en © 2014 Mary R. Hawthorne et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hawthorne, Mary R.
Chretien, Katherine C.
Torre, Dario
Chheda, Shobhina G.
Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
title Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
title_full Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
title_fullStr Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
title_full_unstemmed Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
title_short Re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? A national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
title_sort re-demonstration without remediation – a missed opportunity? a national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25500150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25991
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthornemaryr redemonstrationwithoutremediationamissedopportunityanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineclerkshipdirectors
AT chretienkatherinec redemonstrationwithoutremediationamissedopportunityanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineclerkshipdirectors
AT torredario redemonstrationwithoutremediationamissedopportunityanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineclerkshipdirectors
AT chhedashobhinag redemonstrationwithoutremediationamissedopportunityanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineclerkshipdirectors