Cargando…

Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system with different pathogenesis, brain lesion patterns, and treatment strategies. However, it is still difficult to distinguish these two disease entities by neu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Ming-Feng, Chang, Kuo-Hsuan, Lyu, Rong-Kuo, Huang, Chin-Chang, Chang, Hong-Shiu, Wu, Yih-Ru, Chen, Chiung-Mei, Chu, Chun-Che, Kuo, Hung-Chou, Ro, Long-Sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4264553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25433369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0218-8
_version_ 1782348763635908608
author Liao, Ming-Feng
Chang, Kuo-Hsuan
Lyu, Rong-Kuo
Huang, Chin-Chang
Chang, Hong-Shiu
Wu, Yih-Ru
Chen, Chiung-Mei
Chu, Chun-Che
Kuo, Hung-Chou
Ro, Long-Sun
author_facet Liao, Ming-Feng
Chang, Kuo-Hsuan
Lyu, Rong-Kuo
Huang, Chin-Chang
Chang, Hong-Shiu
Wu, Yih-Ru
Chen, Chiung-Mei
Chu, Chun-Che
Kuo, Hung-Chou
Ro, Long-Sun
author_sort Liao, Ming-Feng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system with different pathogenesis, brain lesion patterns, and treatment strategies. However, it is still difficult to distinguish these two disease entities by neuroimaging studies. Herein, we attempt to differentiate NMOSD from MS by comparing brain lesion patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: The medical records and cranial MRI studies of patients with NMOSD diagnosed according to the 2006 Wingerchuk criteria and the presence of anti-aquaporin 4 (anti-AQP4) antibodies, and patients with MS diagnosed according to the Poser criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-five NMOSD and 29 MS patients were recruited. The NMOSD patients became wheelchair dependent earlier than MS patients (log rank test; P = 0.036). Linear ependymal (28% vs. 0%, P = 0.003) and punctate lesions (64% vs. 28%, P = 0.013) were more frequently seen in NMOSD patients. Ten NMOSD patients (40%) had brain lesions that did not meet the Matthews criteria (MS were separated from NMOSD by the presence of at least 1 lesion adjacent to the body of the lateral ventricle and in the inferior temporal lobe; or the presence of a subcortical U-fiber lesion or a Dawson finger-type lesion). The different image patterns of NMOSD didn’t correlate with the clinical prognosis. However, NMOSD patients with more (≧10) brain lesions at onset became wheelchair dependence earlier than those with fewer (<10) brain lesions (log rank test; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic sensitivity of NMOSD criteria can be increased to 56% by combining the presence of linear ependymal lesions with unmet the Matthews criteria. The prognoses of NMOSD and MS are different. A specific imaging marker, the linear ependymal lesion, was present in some NMOSD patients. The diagnosis of NMOSD can be improved by following the evolution of this imaging feature when anti-AQP4 antibody test results are not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4264553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42645532014-12-13 Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients Liao, Ming-Feng Chang, Kuo-Hsuan Lyu, Rong-Kuo Huang, Chin-Chang Chang, Hong-Shiu Wu, Yih-Ru Chen, Chiung-Mei Chu, Chun-Che Kuo, Hung-Chou Ro, Long-Sun BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system with different pathogenesis, brain lesion patterns, and treatment strategies. However, it is still difficult to distinguish these two disease entities by neuroimaging studies. Herein, we attempt to differentiate NMOSD from MS by comparing brain lesion patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: The medical records and cranial MRI studies of patients with NMOSD diagnosed according to the 2006 Wingerchuk criteria and the presence of anti-aquaporin 4 (anti-AQP4) antibodies, and patients with MS diagnosed according to the Poser criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-five NMOSD and 29 MS patients were recruited. The NMOSD patients became wheelchair dependent earlier than MS patients (log rank test; P = 0.036). Linear ependymal (28% vs. 0%, P = 0.003) and punctate lesions (64% vs. 28%, P = 0.013) were more frequently seen in NMOSD patients. Ten NMOSD patients (40%) had brain lesions that did not meet the Matthews criteria (MS were separated from NMOSD by the presence of at least 1 lesion adjacent to the body of the lateral ventricle and in the inferior temporal lobe; or the presence of a subcortical U-fiber lesion or a Dawson finger-type lesion). The different image patterns of NMOSD didn’t correlate with the clinical prognosis. However, NMOSD patients with more (≧10) brain lesions at onset became wheelchair dependence earlier than those with fewer (<10) brain lesions (log rank test; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic sensitivity of NMOSD criteria can be increased to 56% by combining the presence of linear ependymal lesions with unmet the Matthews criteria. The prognoses of NMOSD and MS are different. A specific imaging marker, the linear ependymal lesion, was present in some NMOSD patients. The diagnosis of NMOSD can be improved by following the evolution of this imaging feature when anti-AQP4 antibody test results are not available. BioMed Central 2014-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4264553/ /pubmed/25433369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0218-8 Text en © Liao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liao, Ming-Feng
Chang, Kuo-Hsuan
Lyu, Rong-Kuo
Huang, Chin-Chang
Chang, Hong-Shiu
Wu, Yih-Ru
Chen, Chiung-Mei
Chu, Chun-Che
Kuo, Hung-Chou
Ro, Long-Sun
Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients
title Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients
title_full Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients
title_fullStr Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients
title_short Comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in Taiwanese patients
title_sort comparison between the cranial magnetic resonance imaging features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder versus multiple sclerosis in taiwanese patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4264553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25433369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0218-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liaomingfeng comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT changkuohsuan comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT lyurongkuo comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT huangchinchang comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT changhongshiu comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT wuyihru comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT chenchiungmei comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT chuchunche comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT kuohungchou comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients
AT rolongsun comparisonbetweenthecranialmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderversusmultiplesclerosisintaiwanesepatients