Cargando…

Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common complex disorder, with new treatment options emerging each year. Social media is being increasingly used to investigate opinions about drugs, diseases and procedures. In this descriptive exploratory study, we sought to investigate opinions about curren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramagopalan, Sreeram, Wasiak, Radek, Cox, Andrew P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4264640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520780
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5263.1
_version_ 1782348771325116416
author Ramagopalan, Sreeram
Wasiak, Radek
Cox, Andrew P.
author_facet Ramagopalan, Sreeram
Wasiak, Radek
Cox, Andrew P.
author_sort Ramagopalan, Sreeram
collection PubMed
description Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common complex disorder, with new treatment options emerging each year. Social media is being increasingly used to investigate opinions about drugs, diseases and procedures. In this descriptive exploratory study, we sought to investigate opinions about currently available MS treatments. Methods: The Twitter resource Topsy was searched for tweets mentioning the following MS treatments: Aubagio, Avonex, Betaferon or Betaseron, Copaxone, Extavia, Gilenya, Lemtrada, Novantrone, Rebif, Tysabri and Tecfidera between 1 Jan 2006 to 31 Jul 2014. Tweets were normalised and sentiment analysis performed. Results: In total, there were 60037 unique tweets mentioning an MS treatment. About half of the tweets contained non-neutral sentiment. Mean sentiment scores were different for treatments ranging from -0.191to 0.282 when investigating all tweets. These differences in sentiment scores between treatments were statistically significant (P<0.001). Sentiment scores tended to be higher for oral MS treatments than injectable treatments. Conclusions: Many tweets about MS treatments have a non-neutral sentiment. The analysis of social media appears to be a potential avenue for exploring patient opinion about MS treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4264640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42646402014-12-16 Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study Ramagopalan, Sreeram Wasiak, Radek Cox, Andrew P. F1000Res Research Note Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common complex disorder, with new treatment options emerging each year. Social media is being increasingly used to investigate opinions about drugs, diseases and procedures. In this descriptive exploratory study, we sought to investigate opinions about currently available MS treatments. Methods: The Twitter resource Topsy was searched for tweets mentioning the following MS treatments: Aubagio, Avonex, Betaferon or Betaseron, Copaxone, Extavia, Gilenya, Lemtrada, Novantrone, Rebif, Tysabri and Tecfidera between 1 Jan 2006 to 31 Jul 2014. Tweets were normalised and sentiment analysis performed. Results: In total, there were 60037 unique tweets mentioning an MS treatment. About half of the tweets contained non-neutral sentiment. Mean sentiment scores were different for treatments ranging from -0.191to 0.282 when investigating all tweets. These differences in sentiment scores between treatments were statistically significant (P<0.001). Sentiment scores tended to be higher for oral MS treatments than injectable treatments. Conclusions: Many tweets about MS treatments have a non-neutral sentiment. The analysis of social media appears to be a potential avenue for exploring patient opinion about MS treatments. F1000Research 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4264640/ /pubmed/25520780 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5263.1 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Ramagopalan S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
spellingShingle Research Note
Ramagopalan, Sreeram
Wasiak, Radek
Cox, Andrew P.
Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
title Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
title_full Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
title_fullStr Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
title_short Using Twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
title_sort using twitter to investigate opinions about multiple sclerosis treatments: a descriptive, exploratory study
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4264640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520780
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5263.1
work_keys_str_mv AT ramagopalansreeram usingtwittertoinvestigateopinionsaboutmultiplesclerosistreatmentsadescriptiveexploratorystudy
AT wasiakradek usingtwittertoinvestigateopinionsaboutmultiplesclerosistreatmentsadescriptiveexploratorystudy
AT coxandrewp usingtwittertoinvestigateopinionsaboutmultiplesclerosistreatmentsadescriptiveexploratorystudy