Cargando…

Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies

Growth condition perturbation or gene function disruption are commonly used strategies to study cellular systems. Although it is widely appreciated that such experiments may involve indirect effects, these frequently remain uncharacterized. Here, analysis of functionally unrelated Saccharyomyces cer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Duibhir, Eoghan, Lijnzaad, Philip, Benschop, Joris J, Lenstra, Tineke L, van Leenen, Dik, Groot Koerkamp, Marian JA, Margaritis, Thanasis, Brok, Mariel O, Kemmeren, Patrick, Holstege, Frank CP
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24952590
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145172
_version_ 1782348817282105344
author O'Duibhir, Eoghan
Lijnzaad, Philip
Benschop, Joris J
Lenstra, Tineke L
van Leenen, Dik
Groot Koerkamp, Marian JA
Margaritis, Thanasis
Brok, Mariel O
Kemmeren, Patrick
Holstege, Frank CP
author_facet O'Duibhir, Eoghan
Lijnzaad, Philip
Benschop, Joris J
Lenstra, Tineke L
van Leenen, Dik
Groot Koerkamp, Marian JA
Margaritis, Thanasis
Brok, Mariel O
Kemmeren, Patrick
Holstege, Frank CP
author_sort O'Duibhir, Eoghan
collection PubMed
description Growth condition perturbation or gene function disruption are commonly used strategies to study cellular systems. Although it is widely appreciated that such experiments may involve indirect effects, these frequently remain uncharacterized. Here, analysis of functionally unrelated Saccharyomyces cerevisiae deletion strains reveals a common gene expression signature. One property shared by these strains is slower growth, with increased presence of the signature in more slowly growing strains. The slow growth signature is highly similar to the environmental stress response (ESR), an expression response common to diverse environmental perturbations. Both environmental and genetic perturbations result in growth rate changes. These are accompanied by a change in the distribution of cells over different cell cycle phases. Rather than representing a direct expression response in single cells, both the slow growth signature and ESR mainly reflect a redistribution of cells over different cell cycle phases, primarily characterized by an increase in the G1 population. The findings have implications for any study of perturbation that is accompanied by growth rate changes. Strategies to counter these effects are presented and discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42650542014-12-24 Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies O'Duibhir, Eoghan Lijnzaad, Philip Benschop, Joris J Lenstra, Tineke L van Leenen, Dik Groot Koerkamp, Marian JA Margaritis, Thanasis Brok, Mariel O Kemmeren, Patrick Holstege, Frank CP Mol Syst Biol Articles Growth condition perturbation or gene function disruption are commonly used strategies to study cellular systems. Although it is widely appreciated that such experiments may involve indirect effects, these frequently remain uncharacterized. Here, analysis of functionally unrelated Saccharyomyces cerevisiae deletion strains reveals a common gene expression signature. One property shared by these strains is slower growth, with increased presence of the signature in more slowly growing strains. The slow growth signature is highly similar to the environmental stress response (ESR), an expression response common to diverse environmental perturbations. Both environmental and genetic perturbations result in growth rate changes. These are accompanied by a change in the distribution of cells over different cell cycle phases. Rather than representing a direct expression response in single cells, both the slow growth signature and ESR mainly reflect a redistribution of cells over different cell cycle phases, primarily characterized by an increase in the G1 population. The findings have implications for any study of perturbation that is accompanied by growth rate changes. Strategies to counter these effects are presented and discussed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4265054/ /pubmed/24952590 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145172 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
O'Duibhir, Eoghan
Lijnzaad, Philip
Benschop, Joris J
Lenstra, Tineke L
van Leenen, Dik
Groot Koerkamp, Marian JA
Margaritis, Thanasis
Brok, Mariel O
Kemmeren, Patrick
Holstege, Frank CP
Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
title Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
title_full Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
title_fullStr Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
title_full_unstemmed Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
title_short Cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
title_sort cell cycle population effects in perturbation studies
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24952590
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145172
work_keys_str_mv AT oduibhireoghan cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT lijnzaadphilip cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT benschopjorisj cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT lenstratinekel cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT vanleenendik cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT grootkoerkampmarianja cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT margaritisthanasis cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT brokmarielo cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT kemmerenpatrick cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies
AT holstegefrankcp cellcyclepopulationeffectsinperturbationstudies