Cargando…

A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits

The retention (binding to or association with the plant) of Escherichia coli by cut leaves and fruits after vigorous water washing was compared with that by sprouts. Retention by fruits and leaves was similar but differed from retention by sprouts in rate, effect of wounding and requirement for poly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathews, Stephanie L, Smith, Rachel B, Matthysse, Ann G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25351040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12165
_version_ 1782348822273327104
author Mathews, Stephanie L
Smith, Rachel B
Matthysse, Ann G
author_facet Mathews, Stephanie L
Smith, Rachel B
Matthysse, Ann G
author_sort Mathews, Stephanie L
collection PubMed
description The retention (binding to or association with the plant) of Escherichia coli by cut leaves and fruits after vigorous water washing was compared with that by sprouts. Retention by fruits and leaves was similar but differed from retention by sprouts in rate, effect of wounding and requirement for poly-β,1-6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Escherichia coli was retained by cut ends of lettuce leaves within 5 min while more than 1 h was required for retention by the intact epidermis of leaves and fruits, and more than 1 day for sprouts. Retention after 5 min at the cut leaf edge was specific for E. coli and was not shown by the plant-associated bacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Sinorhizobium meliloti. Escherichia coli was retained by lettuce, spinach, alfalfa, bean, tomato, Arabidopsis thaliana, cucumber, and pepper leaves and fruits faster than by sprouts. Wounding of leaves and fruits but not sprouts increased bacterial retention. Mutations in the exopolysaccharide synthesis genes yhjN and wcaD reduced the numbers of bacteria retained. PgaC mutants were retained by cut leaves and fruits but not by sprouts. There was no significant difference in the retention of an O157 and a K12 strain by fruits or leaves. However, retention by sprouts of O157 strains was significantly greater than K12 strains. These findings suggest that there are differences in the mechanisms of E coli retention among sprouts, and leaves and fruits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42650752014-12-18 A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits Mathews, Stephanie L Smith, Rachel B Matthysse, Ann G Microb Biotechnol Research Articles The retention (binding to or association with the plant) of Escherichia coli by cut leaves and fruits after vigorous water washing was compared with that by sprouts. Retention by fruits and leaves was similar but differed from retention by sprouts in rate, effect of wounding and requirement for poly-β,1-6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Escherichia coli was retained by cut ends of lettuce leaves within 5 min while more than 1 h was required for retention by the intact epidermis of leaves and fruits, and more than 1 day for sprouts. Retention after 5 min at the cut leaf edge was specific for E. coli and was not shown by the plant-associated bacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Sinorhizobium meliloti. Escherichia coli was retained by lettuce, spinach, alfalfa, bean, tomato, Arabidopsis thaliana, cucumber, and pepper leaves and fruits faster than by sprouts. Wounding of leaves and fruits but not sprouts increased bacterial retention. Mutations in the exopolysaccharide synthesis genes yhjN and wcaD reduced the numbers of bacteria retained. PgaC mutants were retained by cut leaves and fruits but not by sprouts. There was no significant difference in the retention of an O157 and a K12 strain by fruits or leaves. However, retention by sprouts of O157 strains was significantly greater than K12 strains. These findings suggest that there are differences in the mechanisms of E coli retention among sprouts, and leaves and fruits. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4265075/ /pubmed/25351040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12165 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mathews, Stephanie L
Smith, Rachel B
Matthysse, Ann G
A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
title A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
title_full A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
title_fullStr A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
title_short A comparison of the retention of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
title_sort comparison of the retention of pathogenic escherichia coli o157 by sprouts, leaves and fruits
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25351040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12165
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewsstephaniel acomparisonoftheretentionofpathogenicescherichiacolio157bysproutsleavesandfruits
AT smithrachelb acomparisonoftheretentionofpathogenicescherichiacolio157bysproutsleavesandfruits
AT matthysseanng acomparisonoftheretentionofpathogenicescherichiacolio157bysproutsleavesandfruits
AT mathewsstephaniel comparisonoftheretentionofpathogenicescherichiacolio157bysproutsleavesandfruits
AT smithrachelb comparisonoftheretentionofpathogenicescherichiacolio157bysproutsleavesandfruits
AT matthysseanng comparisonoftheretentionofpathogenicescherichiacolio157bysproutsleavesandfruits