Cargando…

How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis

OBJECTIVES: Considering equity into guidelines presents methodological challenges. This study aims to qualitatively synthesise the methods for incorporating equity in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). SETTING: Content analysis of methodological publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Chunhu, Tian, Jinhui, Wang, Quan, Petkovic, Jennifer, Ren, Dan, Yang, Kehu, Yang, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660
_version_ 1782348824365236224
author Shi, Chunhu
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Quan
Petkovic, Jennifer
Ren, Dan
Yang, Kehu
Yang, Yang
author_facet Shi, Chunhu
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Quan
Petkovic, Jennifer
Ren, Dan
Yang, Kehu
Yang, Yang
author_sort Shi, Chunhu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Considering equity into guidelines presents methodological challenges. This study aims to qualitatively synthesise the methods for incorporating equity in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). SETTING: Content analysis of methodological publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Methodological publications were included if they provided checklists/frameworks on when, how and to what extent equity should be incorporated in CPGs. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched MEDLINE, retrieved references, and browsed guideline development organisation websites from inception to January 2013. After study selection by two authors, general characteristics and checklists items/framework components from included studies were extracted. Based on the questions or items from checklists/frameworks (unit of analysis), content analysis was conducted to identify themes and questions/items were grouped into these themes. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were methodological themes and processes on how to address equity issues in guideline development. RESULTS: 8 studies with 10 publications were included from 3405 citations. In total, a list of 87 questions/items was generated from 17 checklists/frameworks. After content analysis, questions were grouped into eight themes (‘scoping questions’, ‘searching relevant evidence’, ‘appraising evidence and recommendations’, ‘formulating recommendations’, ‘monitoring implementation’, ‘providing a flow chart to include equity in CPGs’, and ‘others: reporting of guidelines and comments from stakeholders’ for CPG developers and ‘assessing the quality of CPGs’ for CPG users). Four included studies covered more than five of these themes. We also summarised the process of guideline development based on the themes mentioned above. CONCLUSIONS: For disadvantaged population-specific CPGs, eight important methodological issues identified in this review should be considered when including equity in CPGs under the guidance of a scientific guideline development manual.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42650872014-12-15 How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis Shi, Chunhu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Quan Petkovic, Jennifer Ren, Dan Yang, Kehu Yang, Yang BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: Considering equity into guidelines presents methodological challenges. This study aims to qualitatively synthesise the methods for incorporating equity in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). SETTING: Content analysis of methodological publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Methodological publications were included if they provided checklists/frameworks on when, how and to what extent equity should be incorporated in CPGs. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched MEDLINE, retrieved references, and browsed guideline development organisation websites from inception to January 2013. After study selection by two authors, general characteristics and checklists items/framework components from included studies were extracted. Based on the questions or items from checklists/frameworks (unit of analysis), content analysis was conducted to identify themes and questions/items were grouped into these themes. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were methodological themes and processes on how to address equity issues in guideline development. RESULTS: 8 studies with 10 publications were included from 3405 citations. In total, a list of 87 questions/items was generated from 17 checklists/frameworks. After content analysis, questions were grouped into eight themes (‘scoping questions’, ‘searching relevant evidence’, ‘appraising evidence and recommendations’, ‘formulating recommendations’, ‘monitoring implementation’, ‘providing a flow chart to include equity in CPGs’, and ‘others: reporting of guidelines and comments from stakeholders’ for CPG developers and ‘assessing the quality of CPGs’ for CPG users). Four included studies covered more than five of these themes. We also summarised the process of guideline development based on the themes mentioned above. CONCLUSIONS: For disadvantaged population-specific CPGs, eight important methodological issues identified in this review should be considered when including equity in CPGs under the guidance of a scientific guideline development manual. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4265087/ /pubmed/25479795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Shi, Chunhu
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Quan
Petkovic, Jennifer
Ren, Dan
Yang, Kehu
Yang, Yang
How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
title How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
title_full How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
title_fullStr How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
title_full_unstemmed How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
title_short How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
title_sort how equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660
work_keys_str_mv AT shichunhu howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis
AT tianjinhui howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis
AT wangquan howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis
AT petkovicjennifer howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis
AT rendan howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis
AT yangkehu howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis
AT yangyang howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis