Cargando…
How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis
OBJECTIVES: Considering equity into guidelines presents methodological challenges. This study aims to qualitatively synthesise the methods for incorporating equity in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). SETTING: Content analysis of methodological publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STU...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660 |
_version_ | 1782348824365236224 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Chunhu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Quan Petkovic, Jennifer Ren, Dan Yang, Kehu Yang, Yang |
author_facet | Shi, Chunhu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Quan Petkovic, Jennifer Ren, Dan Yang, Kehu Yang, Yang |
author_sort | Shi, Chunhu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Considering equity into guidelines presents methodological challenges. This study aims to qualitatively synthesise the methods for incorporating equity in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). SETTING: Content analysis of methodological publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Methodological publications were included if they provided checklists/frameworks on when, how and to what extent equity should be incorporated in CPGs. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched MEDLINE, retrieved references, and browsed guideline development organisation websites from inception to January 2013. After study selection by two authors, general characteristics and checklists items/framework components from included studies were extracted. Based on the questions or items from checklists/frameworks (unit of analysis), content analysis was conducted to identify themes and questions/items were grouped into these themes. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were methodological themes and processes on how to address equity issues in guideline development. RESULTS: 8 studies with 10 publications were included from 3405 citations. In total, a list of 87 questions/items was generated from 17 checklists/frameworks. After content analysis, questions were grouped into eight themes (‘scoping questions’, ‘searching relevant evidence’, ‘appraising evidence and recommendations’, ‘formulating recommendations’, ‘monitoring implementation’, ‘providing a flow chart to include equity in CPGs’, and ‘others: reporting of guidelines and comments from stakeholders’ for CPG developers and ‘assessing the quality of CPGs’ for CPG users). Four included studies covered more than five of these themes. We also summarised the process of guideline development based on the themes mentioned above. CONCLUSIONS: For disadvantaged population-specific CPGs, eight important methodological issues identified in this review should be considered when including equity in CPGs under the guidance of a scientific guideline development manual. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4265087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42650872014-12-15 How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis Shi, Chunhu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Quan Petkovic, Jennifer Ren, Dan Yang, Kehu Yang, Yang BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: Considering equity into guidelines presents methodological challenges. This study aims to qualitatively synthesise the methods for incorporating equity in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). SETTING: Content analysis of methodological publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Methodological publications were included if they provided checklists/frameworks on when, how and to what extent equity should be incorporated in CPGs. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched MEDLINE, retrieved references, and browsed guideline development organisation websites from inception to January 2013. After study selection by two authors, general characteristics and checklists items/framework components from included studies were extracted. Based on the questions or items from checklists/frameworks (unit of analysis), content analysis was conducted to identify themes and questions/items were grouped into these themes. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were methodological themes and processes on how to address equity issues in guideline development. RESULTS: 8 studies with 10 publications were included from 3405 citations. In total, a list of 87 questions/items was generated from 17 checklists/frameworks. After content analysis, questions were grouped into eight themes (‘scoping questions’, ‘searching relevant evidence’, ‘appraising evidence and recommendations’, ‘formulating recommendations’, ‘monitoring implementation’, ‘providing a flow chart to include equity in CPGs’, and ‘others: reporting of guidelines and comments from stakeholders’ for CPG developers and ‘assessing the quality of CPGs’ for CPG users). Four included studies covered more than five of these themes. We also summarised the process of guideline development based on the themes mentioned above. CONCLUSIONS: For disadvantaged population-specific CPGs, eight important methodological issues identified in this review should be considered when including equity in CPGs under the guidance of a scientific guideline development manual. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4265087/ /pubmed/25479795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Shi, Chunhu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Quan Petkovic, Jennifer Ren, Dan Yang, Kehu Yang, Yang How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
title | How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
title_full | How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
title_fullStr | How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
title_short | How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
title_sort | how equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shichunhu howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis AT tianjinhui howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis AT wangquan howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis AT petkovicjennifer howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis AT rendan howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis AT yangkehu howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis AT yangyang howequityisaddressedinclinicalpracticeguidelinesacontentanalysis |