Cargando…

Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes and contrast closed loop using diluted versus standard insulin strength. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven children (male 6; age range 3.75–6.96 years; glycated hemoglobin 60 (14) mmol/mol; bod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elleri, Daniela, Allen, Janet M, Tauschmann, Martin, El-Khairi, Ranna, Benitez-Aguirre, Paul, Acerini, Carlo L, Dunger, David B, Hovorka, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000040
_version_ 1782348826807369728
author Elleri, Daniela
Allen, Janet M
Tauschmann, Martin
El-Khairi, Ranna
Benitez-Aguirre, Paul
Acerini, Carlo L
Dunger, David B
Hovorka, Roman
author_facet Elleri, Daniela
Allen, Janet M
Tauschmann, Martin
El-Khairi, Ranna
Benitez-Aguirre, Paul
Acerini, Carlo L
Dunger, David B
Hovorka, Roman
author_sort Elleri, Daniela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes and contrast closed loop using diluted versus standard insulin strength. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven children (male 6; age range 3.75–6.96 years; glycated hemoglobin 60 (14) mmol/mol; body mass index SD score 1.0 (0.8); diabetes duration 2.2 (1.0) years, mean (SD); total daily dose 12.9 (10.6, 16.5) IU/day, median (IQR)) were studied at a clinical research facility on two occasions. In random order, participants received closed loop with diluted insulin aspart (CL_Dil; 20 IU/mL) or closed loop with standard aspart (CL_Std; 100 IU/mL) from 17:00 until 8:00 the following morning. Children consumed an evening meal at 17:00 (44 (12) gCHO) and an optional bedtime snack (6 (7) gCHO) identical on both occasions. Meal insulin boluses were calculated by standard pump bolus calculators. Basal rates on insulin pump were adjusted every 15 min as directed by a model-predictive-control algorithm informed by a real-time glucose sensor values. RESULTS: Mean plasma glucose was 122 (24) mg/dL during CL_Dil vs 122 (23) mg/dL during CL_Std (p=0.993). The time spent in the target glucose range 70–145 mg/dL was 83 (70, 100)% vs 72 (54, 81)% (p=0.328). Time above 145 mg/dL was 13 (0, 27)% vs 19 (10, 45)% (p=0.477) and time spent below 70 mg/dL was 0.0 (0.0, 1.4)% vs 1.4 (0.0, 11.6)% (p=0.161). One asymptomatic hypoglycemia below 63 mg/dL occurred in one participant during CL_Dil versus six episodes in five participants during CL_Std (p=0.09). Glucose variability measured by CV of plasma glucose tended to be reduced during CL_Dil (20% (13, 31) vs 32% (24, 42), p=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: In this feasibility study, closed-loop therapy maintained good overnight glucose control with tendency towards reduced hypoglycemia and reduced glucose variability using diluted insulin. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01557634.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42651212014-12-15 Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength Elleri, Daniela Allen, Janet M Tauschmann, Martin El-Khairi, Ranna Benitez-Aguirre, Paul Acerini, Carlo L Dunger, David B Hovorka, Roman BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes and contrast closed loop using diluted versus standard insulin strength. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven children (male 6; age range 3.75–6.96 years; glycated hemoglobin 60 (14) mmol/mol; body mass index SD score 1.0 (0.8); diabetes duration 2.2 (1.0) years, mean (SD); total daily dose 12.9 (10.6, 16.5) IU/day, median (IQR)) were studied at a clinical research facility on two occasions. In random order, participants received closed loop with diluted insulin aspart (CL_Dil; 20 IU/mL) or closed loop with standard aspart (CL_Std; 100 IU/mL) from 17:00 until 8:00 the following morning. Children consumed an evening meal at 17:00 (44 (12) gCHO) and an optional bedtime snack (6 (7) gCHO) identical on both occasions. Meal insulin boluses were calculated by standard pump bolus calculators. Basal rates on insulin pump were adjusted every 15 min as directed by a model-predictive-control algorithm informed by a real-time glucose sensor values. RESULTS: Mean plasma glucose was 122 (24) mg/dL during CL_Dil vs 122 (23) mg/dL during CL_Std (p=0.993). The time spent in the target glucose range 70–145 mg/dL was 83 (70, 100)% vs 72 (54, 81)% (p=0.328). Time above 145 mg/dL was 13 (0, 27)% vs 19 (10, 45)% (p=0.477) and time spent below 70 mg/dL was 0.0 (0.0, 1.4)% vs 1.4 (0.0, 11.6)% (p=0.161). One asymptomatic hypoglycemia below 63 mg/dL occurred in one participant during CL_Dil versus six episodes in five participants during CL_Std (p=0.09). Glucose variability measured by CV of plasma glucose tended to be reduced during CL_Dil (20% (13, 31) vs 32% (24, 42), p=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: In this feasibility study, closed-loop therapy maintained good overnight glucose control with tendency towards reduced hypoglycemia and reduced glucose variability using diluted insulin. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01557634. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4265121/ /pubmed/25512874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000040 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics
Elleri, Daniela
Allen, Janet M
Tauschmann, Martin
El-Khairi, Ranna
Benitez-Aguirre, Paul
Acerini, Carlo L
Dunger, David B
Hovorka, Roman
Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
title Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
title_full Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
title_fullStr Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
title_short Feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
title_sort feasibility of overnight closed-loop therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes aged 3–6 years: comparison between diluted and standard insulin strength
topic Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000040
work_keys_str_mv AT elleridaniela feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT allenjanetm feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT tauschmannmartin feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT elkhairiranna feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT benitezaguirrepaul feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT acerinicarlol feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT dungerdavidb feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength
AT hovorkaroman feasibilityofovernightclosedlooptherapyinyoungchildrenwithtype1diabetesaged36yearscomparisonbetweendilutedandstandardinsulinstrength