Cargando…
High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults
OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the direction of the association between sitting time and obesity is limited. The prospective associations between baseline total sitting time and subsequent changes in body mass index (BMI), and baseline BMI and subsequent changes in sitting time were examined. METHODS: BMI,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24943057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20817 |
_version_ | 1782348856054251520 |
---|---|
author | Pedisic, Zeljko Grunseit, Anne Ding, Ding Chau, Josephine Y Banks, Emily Stamatakis, Emmanuel Jalaludin, Bin B Bauman, Adrian E |
author_facet | Pedisic, Zeljko Grunseit, Anne Ding, Ding Chau, Josephine Y Banks, Emily Stamatakis, Emmanuel Jalaludin, Bin B Bauman, Adrian E |
author_sort | Pedisic, Zeljko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the direction of the association between sitting time and obesity is limited. The prospective associations between baseline total sitting time and subsequent changes in body mass index (BMI), and baseline BMI and subsequent changes in sitting time were examined. METHODS: BMI, from self-reported height and weight, and a single-item measure of sitting time were ascertained at two time points (3.4 ± 0.96 years apart) in a prospective questionnaire-based cohort of 31,787 Australians aged 45–65 years without severe physical limitations. RESULTS: In a fully adjusted model, baseline obesity was associated with increased sitting time among all participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20 [95% CI, 1.11-1.30]; P < 0.001) and in most subgroups. The association was significant among those who were sitting <4 hours/day (aOR = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.07-1.44]; P = 0.004) and 4–8 hours/day at baseline (aOR=1.18 [95% CI, 1.06-1.32]; P = 0.003), but not in the high sitting groups (P = 0.111 and 0.188 for 8–11 and ≥11 sitting hours/day, respectively). Nonsignificant and inconsistent results were observed for the association between baseline sitting time and subsequent change in BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that obesity may lead to a subsequent increase in total sitting time, but the association in the other direction is unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4265269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42652692014-12-23 High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults Pedisic, Zeljko Grunseit, Anne Ding, Ding Chau, Josephine Y Banks, Emily Stamatakis, Emmanuel Jalaludin, Bin B Bauman, Adrian E Obesity (Silver Spring) Brief Cutting Edge Reports OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the direction of the association between sitting time and obesity is limited. The prospective associations between baseline total sitting time and subsequent changes in body mass index (BMI), and baseline BMI and subsequent changes in sitting time were examined. METHODS: BMI, from self-reported height and weight, and a single-item measure of sitting time were ascertained at two time points (3.4 ± 0.96 years apart) in a prospective questionnaire-based cohort of 31,787 Australians aged 45–65 years without severe physical limitations. RESULTS: In a fully adjusted model, baseline obesity was associated with increased sitting time among all participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20 [95% CI, 1.11-1.30]; P < 0.001) and in most subgroups. The association was significant among those who were sitting <4 hours/day (aOR = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.07-1.44]; P = 0.004) and 4–8 hours/day at baseline (aOR=1.18 [95% CI, 1.06-1.32]; P = 0.003), but not in the high sitting groups (P = 0.111 and 0.188 for 8–11 and ≥11 sitting hours/day, respectively). Nonsignificant and inconsistent results were observed for the association between baseline sitting time and subsequent change in BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that obesity may lead to a subsequent increase in total sitting time, but the association in the other direction is unclear. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4265269/ /pubmed/24943057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20817 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Obesity Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Brief Cutting Edge Reports Pedisic, Zeljko Grunseit, Anne Ding, Ding Chau, Josephine Y Banks, Emily Stamatakis, Emmanuel Jalaludin, Bin B Bauman, Adrian E High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults |
title | High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults |
title_full | High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults |
title_fullStr | High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults |
title_full_unstemmed | High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults |
title_short | High sitting time or obesity: Which came first? Bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 Australian adults |
title_sort | high sitting time or obesity: which came first? bidirectional association in a longitudinal study of 31,787 australian adults |
topic | Brief Cutting Edge Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24943057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20817 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedisiczeljko highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT grunseitanne highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT dingding highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT chaujosephiney highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT banksemily highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT stamatakisemmanuel highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT jalaludinbinb highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults AT baumanadriane highsittingtimeorobesitywhichcamefirstbidirectionalassociationinalongitudinalstudyof31787australianadults |