Cargando…
Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce
BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) may improve selection response over conventional pedigree-based selection if markers capture more detailed information than pedigrees in recently domesticated tree species and/or make it more cost effective. Genomic prediction accuracies using 1748 trees and 6932 S...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25442968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1048 |
_version_ | 1782348881422450688 |
---|---|
author | Beaulieu, Jean Doerksen, Trevor K MacKay, John Rainville, André Bousquet, Jean |
author_facet | Beaulieu, Jean Doerksen, Trevor K MacKay, John Rainville, André Bousquet, Jean |
author_sort | Beaulieu, Jean |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) may improve selection response over conventional pedigree-based selection if markers capture more detailed information than pedigrees in recently domesticated tree species and/or make it more cost effective. Genomic prediction accuracies using 1748 trees and 6932 SNPs representative of as many distinct gene loci were determined for growth and wood traits in white spruce, within and between environments and breeding groups (BG), each with an effective size of N(e) ≈ 20. Marker subsets were also tested. RESULTS: Model fits and/or cross-validation (CV) prediction accuracies for ridge regression (RR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models approached those of pedigree-based models. With strong relatedness between CV sets, prediction accuracies for RR within environment and BG were high for wood (r = 0.71–0.79) and moderately high for growth (r = 0.52–0.69) traits, in line with trends in heritabilities. For both classes of traits, these accuracies achieved between 83% and 92% of those obtained with phenotypes and pedigree information. Prediction into untested environments remained moderately high for wood (r ≥ 0.61) but dropped significantly for growth (r ≥ 0.24) traits, emphasizing the need to phenotype in all test environments and model genotype-by-environment interactions for growth traits. Removing relatedness between CV sets sharply decreased prediction accuracies for all traits and subpopulations, falling near zero between BGs with no known shared ancestry. For marker subsets, similar patterns were observed but with lower prediction accuracies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the need for high relatedness between CV sets to obtain good prediction accuracies, we recommend to build GS models for prediction within the same breeding population only. Breeding groups could be merged to build genomic prediction models as long as the total effective population size does not exceed 50 individuals in order to obtain high prediction accuracy such as that obtained in the present study. A number of markers limited to a few hundred would not negatively impact prediction accuracies, but these could decrease more rapidly over generations. The most promising short-term approach for genomic selection would likely be the selection of superior individuals within large full-sib families vegetatively propagated to implement multiclonal forestry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4265403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42654032014-12-15 Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce Beaulieu, Jean Doerksen, Trevor K MacKay, John Rainville, André Bousquet, Jean BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) may improve selection response over conventional pedigree-based selection if markers capture more detailed information than pedigrees in recently domesticated tree species and/or make it more cost effective. Genomic prediction accuracies using 1748 trees and 6932 SNPs representative of as many distinct gene loci were determined for growth and wood traits in white spruce, within and between environments and breeding groups (BG), each with an effective size of N(e) ≈ 20. Marker subsets were also tested. RESULTS: Model fits and/or cross-validation (CV) prediction accuracies for ridge regression (RR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models approached those of pedigree-based models. With strong relatedness between CV sets, prediction accuracies for RR within environment and BG were high for wood (r = 0.71–0.79) and moderately high for growth (r = 0.52–0.69) traits, in line with trends in heritabilities. For both classes of traits, these accuracies achieved between 83% and 92% of those obtained with phenotypes and pedigree information. Prediction into untested environments remained moderately high for wood (r ≥ 0.61) but dropped significantly for growth (r ≥ 0.24) traits, emphasizing the need to phenotype in all test environments and model genotype-by-environment interactions for growth traits. Removing relatedness between CV sets sharply decreased prediction accuracies for all traits and subpopulations, falling near zero between BGs with no known shared ancestry. For marker subsets, similar patterns were observed but with lower prediction accuracies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the need for high relatedness between CV sets to obtain good prediction accuracies, we recommend to build GS models for prediction within the same breeding population only. Breeding groups could be merged to build genomic prediction models as long as the total effective population size does not exceed 50 individuals in order to obtain high prediction accuracy such as that obtained in the present study. A number of markers limited to a few hundred would not negatively impact prediction accuracies, but these could decrease more rapidly over generations. The most promising short-term approach for genomic selection would likely be the selection of superior individuals within large full-sib families vegetatively propagated to implement multiclonal forestry. BioMed Central 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4265403/ /pubmed/25442968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1048 Text en © Beaulieu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Beaulieu, Jean Doerksen, Trevor K MacKay, John Rainville, André Bousquet, Jean Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
title | Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
title_full | Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
title_fullStr | Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
title_short | Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
title_sort | genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25442968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaulieujean genomicselectionaccuracieswithinandbetweenenvironmentsandsmallbreedinggroupsinwhitespruce AT doerksentrevork genomicselectionaccuracieswithinandbetweenenvironmentsandsmallbreedinggroupsinwhitespruce AT mackayjohn genomicselectionaccuracieswithinandbetweenenvironmentsandsmallbreedinggroupsinwhitespruce AT rainvilleandre genomicselectionaccuracieswithinandbetweenenvironmentsandsmallbreedinggroupsinwhitespruce AT bousquetjean genomicselectionaccuracieswithinandbetweenenvironmentsandsmallbreedinggroupsinwhitespruce |