Cargando…

Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies

BACKGROUND: Online content is a primary source of healthcare information for internet-using adults and a rich resource for health researchers. This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues of engaging in health research using social media. METHODS: A metamethod was performed on systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gustafson, Diana L, Woodworth, Claire F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25468265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-127
_version_ 1782348886592978944
author Gustafson, Diana L
Woodworth, Claire F
author_facet Gustafson, Diana L
Woodworth, Claire F
author_sort Gustafson, Diana L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Online content is a primary source of healthcare information for internet-using adults and a rich resource for health researchers. This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues of engaging in health research using social media. METHODS: A metamethod was performed on systematically selected studies that used social media as a data source for exploring public awareness and beliefs about Human Papillomaviruses (HPV) and HPV vaccination. Seven electronic databases were searched using a variety of search terms identified for each of three concepts: social media, HPV vaccine, and research method. Abstracts were assessed for eligibility of inclusion; six studies met the eligibility criteria and were subjected to content analysis. A 10-item coding scheme was developed to assess the clarity, congruence and transparency of research design, epistemological and methodological underpinnings and ethical considerations. RESULTS: The designs of the six selected studies were sound, although most studies could have been more transparent about how they built in rigor to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of findings. Statistical analysis that intended to measure trends and patterns did so without the benefit of randomized sampling and other design elements for ensuring generalizability or reproducibility of findings beyond the specified virtual community. Most researchers did not sufficiently engage virtual users in the research process or consider the risk of privacy incursion. Most studies did not seek ethical approval from an institutional research board or permission from host websites or web service providers. CONCLUSIONS: The metamethod exposed missed opportunities for using the dialogical character of social media as well as a lack of attention to the unique ethical issues inherent in operating in a virtual community where social boundaries and issues of public and private are ambiguous. This suggests the need for more self-conscious and ethical research practices when using social media as a data source. Given the relative newness of virtual communities, researchers and ethics review boards must work together to develop expertise in evaluating the design of studies undertaken with virtual communities. We recommend that the principles of concern for welfare, respect for person, and justice to be applied in research using social media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42654252014-12-15 Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies Gustafson, Diana L Woodworth, Claire F BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Online content is a primary source of healthcare information for internet-using adults and a rich resource for health researchers. This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues of engaging in health research using social media. METHODS: A metamethod was performed on systematically selected studies that used social media as a data source for exploring public awareness and beliefs about Human Papillomaviruses (HPV) and HPV vaccination. Seven electronic databases were searched using a variety of search terms identified for each of three concepts: social media, HPV vaccine, and research method. Abstracts were assessed for eligibility of inclusion; six studies met the eligibility criteria and were subjected to content analysis. A 10-item coding scheme was developed to assess the clarity, congruence and transparency of research design, epistemological and methodological underpinnings and ethical considerations. RESULTS: The designs of the six selected studies were sound, although most studies could have been more transparent about how they built in rigor to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of findings. Statistical analysis that intended to measure trends and patterns did so without the benefit of randomized sampling and other design elements for ensuring generalizability or reproducibility of findings beyond the specified virtual community. Most researchers did not sufficiently engage virtual users in the research process or consider the risk of privacy incursion. Most studies did not seek ethical approval from an institutional research board or permission from host websites or web service providers. CONCLUSIONS: The metamethod exposed missed opportunities for using the dialogical character of social media as well as a lack of attention to the unique ethical issues inherent in operating in a virtual community where social boundaries and issues of public and private are ambiguous. This suggests the need for more self-conscious and ethical research practices when using social media as a data source. Given the relative newness of virtual communities, researchers and ethics review boards must work together to develop expertise in evaluating the design of studies undertaken with virtual communities. We recommend that the principles of concern for welfare, respect for person, and justice to be applied in research using social media. BioMed Central 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4265425/ /pubmed/25468265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-127 Text en © Gustafson and Woodworth; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gustafson, Diana L
Woodworth, Claire F
Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies
title Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies
title_full Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies
title_fullStr Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies
title_full_unstemmed Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies
title_short Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies
title_sort methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of human papillomavirus vaccine studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25468265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-127
work_keys_str_mv AT gustafsondianal methodologicalandethicalissuesinresearchusingsocialmediaametamethodofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinestudies
AT woodworthclairef methodologicalandethicalissuesinresearchusingsocialmediaametamethodofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinestudies