Cargando…

Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems may improve the diagnosis and ongoing management of chronic diseases, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, disease and medication monitoring and modification of patient behavior. The aim of this review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fathima, Mariam, Peiris, David, Naik-Panvelkar, Pradnya, Saini, Bandana, Armour, Carol Lyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25439006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-189
_version_ 1782348890790428672
author Fathima, Mariam
Peiris, David
Naik-Panvelkar, Pradnya
Saini, Bandana
Armour, Carol Lyn
author_facet Fathima, Mariam
Peiris, David
Naik-Panvelkar, Pradnya
Saini, Bandana
Armour, Carol Lyn
author_sort Fathima, Mariam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems may improve the diagnosis and ongoing management of chronic diseases, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, disease and medication monitoring and modification of patient behavior. The aim of this review was to systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision systems (CCDSS) in the care of people with asthma and COPD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2013 were searched using multiple electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, IPA, Informit, PsychINFO, Compendex, and Cochrane Clinical Controlled Trials Register databases. To be included, RCTs had to evaluate the role of the CCDSSs for asthma and/or COPD in primary care. RESULTS: Nineteen studies representing 16 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The majority of the trials were conducted in patients with asthma. Study quality was generally high. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The use of CCDSS improved asthma and COPD care in 14 of the 19 studies reviewed (74%). Nine of the nineteen studies showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the primary outcomes measured. The majority of the studies evaluated health care process measures as their primary outcomes (10/19). CONCLUSION: Evidence supports the effectiveness of CCDSS in the care of people with asthma. However there is very little information of its use in COPD care. Although there is considerable improvement in the health care process measures and clinical outcomes through the use of CCDSSs, its effects on user workload and efficiency, safety, costs of care, provider and patient satisfaction remain understudied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-189) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42654432014-12-15 Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review Fathima, Mariam Peiris, David Naik-Panvelkar, Pradnya Saini, Bandana Armour, Carol Lyn BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems may improve the diagnosis and ongoing management of chronic diseases, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, disease and medication monitoring and modification of patient behavior. The aim of this review was to systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision systems (CCDSS) in the care of people with asthma and COPD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2013 were searched using multiple electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, IPA, Informit, PsychINFO, Compendex, and Cochrane Clinical Controlled Trials Register databases. To be included, RCTs had to evaluate the role of the CCDSSs for asthma and/or COPD in primary care. RESULTS: Nineteen studies representing 16 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The majority of the trials were conducted in patients with asthma. Study quality was generally high. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The use of CCDSS improved asthma and COPD care in 14 of the 19 studies reviewed (74%). Nine of the nineteen studies showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the primary outcomes measured. The majority of the studies evaluated health care process measures as their primary outcomes (10/19). CONCLUSION: Evidence supports the effectiveness of CCDSS in the care of people with asthma. However there is very little information of its use in COPD care. Although there is considerable improvement in the health care process measures and clinical outcomes through the use of CCDSSs, its effects on user workload and efficiency, safety, costs of care, provider and patient satisfaction remain understudied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-189) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4265443/ /pubmed/25439006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-189 Text en © Fathima et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fathima, Mariam
Peiris, David
Naik-Panvelkar, Pradnya
Saini, Bandana
Armour, Carol Lyn
Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
title Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25439006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-189
work_keys_str_mv AT fathimamariam effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT peirisdavid effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT naikpanvelkarpradnya effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT sainibandana effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT armourcarollyn effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinprimarycareasystematicreview