Cargando…

Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia is an urgent health concern with high mortality and long hospitalization in industrialized and aging countries. However, there is no information about the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. This study investigated if AZM is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marumo, Satoshi, Teranishi, Takashi, Higami, Yuichi, Koshimo, Yoshihiko, Kiyokawa, Hirofumi, Kato, Motokazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0685-y
_version_ 1782348895736561664
author Marumo, Satoshi
Teranishi, Takashi
Higami, Yuichi
Koshimo, Yoshihiko
Kiyokawa, Hirofumi
Kato, Motokazu
author_facet Marumo, Satoshi
Teranishi, Takashi
Higami, Yuichi
Koshimo, Yoshihiko
Kiyokawa, Hirofumi
Kato, Motokazu
author_sort Marumo, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia is an urgent health concern with high mortality and long hospitalization in industrialized and aging countries. However, there is no information about the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. This study investigated if AZM is effective for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: Patients with aspiration pneumonia with no risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens were included in this prospective study at Kishiwada City Hospital from December 2011 to June 2013. Patients were divided into the ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) and AZM (intravenous injection) groups. The success rates of 1(st)-line antibiotic therapy, mortality, length of hospital stay, and total antibiotic costs were compared. RESULTS: There were 81 and 36 patients in the ABPC/SBT and AZM groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the success rate of 1(st)-line antibiotics between the groups (74.1% vs. 75.0%, respectively, P = 1.000). Mortality and hospitalization periods did not differ between the 2 groups (11.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.753, and 22.3 ± 7.3 days vs. 20.5 ± 8.1 days, P = 0.654, respectively). However, the total antibiotic costs were significantly lower in the AZM group than the ABPC/SBT group (2.19 ± 1.65 × 10,000 yen vs. 2.94 ± 1.67 × 10,000 yen, respectively, P = 0.034). The febrile period of the ABPC/SBT group was significantly shorter than that of the AZM group (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this small prospective non-randomized observational study, we found no statistically significant differences in mortality or antibiotic failure in patients receiving AZM compared to ABPC/SBT for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia who require hospital admission and have no risk of drug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, AZM may be another first choice of antibiotic treatment for patients with aspiration pneumonia when they have no risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0685-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42654722014-12-15 Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study Marumo, Satoshi Teranishi, Takashi Higami, Yuichi Koshimo, Yoshihiko Kiyokawa, Hirofumi Kato, Motokazu BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia is an urgent health concern with high mortality and long hospitalization in industrialized and aging countries. However, there is no information about the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. This study investigated if AZM is effective for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: Patients with aspiration pneumonia with no risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens were included in this prospective study at Kishiwada City Hospital from December 2011 to June 2013. Patients were divided into the ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) and AZM (intravenous injection) groups. The success rates of 1(st)-line antibiotic therapy, mortality, length of hospital stay, and total antibiotic costs were compared. RESULTS: There were 81 and 36 patients in the ABPC/SBT and AZM groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the success rate of 1(st)-line antibiotics between the groups (74.1% vs. 75.0%, respectively, P = 1.000). Mortality and hospitalization periods did not differ between the 2 groups (11.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.753, and 22.3 ± 7.3 days vs. 20.5 ± 8.1 days, P = 0.654, respectively). However, the total antibiotic costs were significantly lower in the AZM group than the ABPC/SBT group (2.19 ± 1.65 × 10,000 yen vs. 2.94 ± 1.67 × 10,000 yen, respectively, P = 0.034). The febrile period of the ABPC/SBT group was significantly shorter than that of the AZM group (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this small prospective non-randomized observational study, we found no statistically significant differences in mortality or antibiotic failure in patients receiving AZM compared to ABPC/SBT for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia who require hospital admission and have no risk of drug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, AZM may be another first choice of antibiotic treatment for patients with aspiration pneumonia when they have no risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0685-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4265472/ /pubmed/25491126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0685-y Text en © Marumo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marumo, Satoshi
Teranishi, Takashi
Higami, Yuichi
Koshimo, Yoshihiko
Kiyokawa, Hirofumi
Kato, Motokazu
Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
title Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
title_full Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
title_short Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
title_sort effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0685-y
work_keys_str_mv AT marumosatoshi effectivenessofazithromycininaspirationpneumoniaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT teranishitakashi effectivenessofazithromycininaspirationpneumoniaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT higamiyuichi effectivenessofazithromycininaspirationpneumoniaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT koshimoyoshihiko effectivenessofazithromycininaspirationpneumoniaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kiyokawahirofumi effectivenessofazithromycininaspirationpneumoniaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT katomotokazu effectivenessofazithromycininaspirationpneumoniaaprospectiveobservationalstudy