Cargando…

Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain from the upper extremity and shoulder region is commonly reported by computer users. However, the functional status of central pain mechanisms, i.e., central sensitization and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), has not been investigated in this population. The aim wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Hong-You, Vangsgaard, Steffen, Omland, Øyvind, Madeleine, Pascal, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-412
_version_ 1782348902889947136
author Ge, Hong-You
Vangsgaard, Steffen
Omland, Øyvind
Madeleine, Pascal
Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
author_facet Ge, Hong-You
Vangsgaard, Steffen
Omland, Øyvind
Madeleine, Pascal
Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
author_sort Ge, Hong-You
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain from the upper extremity and shoulder region is commonly reported by computer users. However, the functional status of central pain mechanisms, i.e., central sensitization and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), has not been investigated in this population. The aim was to evaluate sensitization and CPM in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: Pressure pain threshold (PPT) mapping in the neck-shoulder (15 points) and the elbow (12 points) was assessed together with PPT measurement at mid-point in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle among 47 computer users with chronic pain in the upper extremity and/or neck-shoulder pain (pain group) and 17 pain-free computer users (control group). Induced pain intensities and profiles over time were recorded using a 0-10 cm electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) in response to different levels of pressure stimuli on the forearm with a new technique of dynamic pressure algometry. The efficiency of CPM was assessed using cuff-induced pain as conditioning pain stimulus and PPT at TA as test stimulus. RESULTS: The demographics, job seniority and number of working hours/week using a computer were similar between groups. The PPTs measured at all 15 points in the neck-shoulder region were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences between groups neither in PPTs nor pain intensity induced by dynamic pressure algometry. No significant difference in PPT was observed in TA between groups. During CPM, a significant increase in PPT at TA was observed in both groups (P < 0.05) without significant differences between groups. For the chronic pain group, higher clinical pain intensity, lower PPT values from the neck-shoulder and higher pain intensity evoked by the roller were all correlated with less efficient descending pain modulation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that the excitability of the central pain system is normal in a large group of computer users with low pain intensity chronic upper extremity and/or neck-shoulder pain and that increased excitability of the pain system cannot explain the reported pain. However, computer users with higher pain intensity and lower PPTs were found to have decreased efficiency in descending pain modulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-412) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42655052014-12-15 Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain Ge, Hong-You Vangsgaard, Steffen Omland, Øyvind Madeleine, Pascal Arendt-Nielsen, Lars BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain from the upper extremity and shoulder region is commonly reported by computer users. However, the functional status of central pain mechanisms, i.e., central sensitization and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), has not been investigated in this population. The aim was to evaluate sensitization and CPM in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: Pressure pain threshold (PPT) mapping in the neck-shoulder (15 points) and the elbow (12 points) was assessed together with PPT measurement at mid-point in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle among 47 computer users with chronic pain in the upper extremity and/or neck-shoulder pain (pain group) and 17 pain-free computer users (control group). Induced pain intensities and profiles over time were recorded using a 0-10 cm electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) in response to different levels of pressure stimuli on the forearm with a new technique of dynamic pressure algometry. The efficiency of CPM was assessed using cuff-induced pain as conditioning pain stimulus and PPT at TA as test stimulus. RESULTS: The demographics, job seniority and number of working hours/week using a computer were similar between groups. The PPTs measured at all 15 points in the neck-shoulder region were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences between groups neither in PPTs nor pain intensity induced by dynamic pressure algometry. No significant difference in PPT was observed in TA between groups. During CPM, a significant increase in PPT at TA was observed in both groups (P < 0.05) without significant differences between groups. For the chronic pain group, higher clinical pain intensity, lower PPT values from the neck-shoulder and higher pain intensity evoked by the roller were all correlated with less efficient descending pain modulation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that the excitability of the central pain system is normal in a large group of computer users with low pain intensity chronic upper extremity and/or neck-shoulder pain and that increased excitability of the pain system cannot explain the reported pain. However, computer users with higher pain intensity and lower PPTs were found to have decreased efficiency in descending pain modulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-412) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4265505/ /pubmed/25481709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-412 Text en © Ge et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ge, Hong-You
Vangsgaard, Steffen
Omland, Øyvind
Madeleine, Pascal
Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
title Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_full Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_fullStr Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_short Mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
title_sort mechanistic experimental pain assessment in computer users with and without chronic musculoskeletal pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-412
work_keys_str_mv AT gehongyou mechanisticexperimentalpainassessmentincomputeruserswithandwithoutchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT vangsgaardsteffen mechanisticexperimentalpainassessmentincomputeruserswithandwithoutchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT omlandøyvind mechanisticexperimentalpainassessmentincomputeruserswithandwithoutchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT madeleinepascal mechanisticexperimentalpainassessmentincomputeruserswithandwithoutchronicmusculoskeletalpain
AT arendtnielsenlars mechanisticexperimentalpainassessmentincomputeruserswithandwithoutchronicmusculoskeletalpain