Cargando…
A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-66 |
_version_ | 1782348908304793600 |
---|---|
author | Kriza, Christine Hanass-Hancock, Jill Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah Deghaye, Nicola Aman, Rashid Wahlster, Philip Marin, Mayra Gebe, Nicodemus Akhwale, Willis Wachsmuth, Isabelle Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L |
author_facet | Kriza, Christine Hanass-Hancock, Jill Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah Deghaye, Nicola Aman, Rashid Wahlster, Philip Marin, Mayra Gebe, Nicodemus Akhwale, Willis Wachsmuth, Isabelle Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L |
author_sort | Kriza, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for “resource-poor” settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for “resource-limited” settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria. RESULTS: Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate HTA tool for “resource-constrained” settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4265527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42655272014-12-15 A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications Kriza, Christine Hanass-Hancock, Jill Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah Deghaye, Nicola Aman, Rashid Wahlster, Philip Marin, Mayra Gebe, Nicodemus Akhwale, Willis Wachsmuth, Isabelle Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for “resource-poor” settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for “resource-limited” settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria. RESULTS: Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate HTA tool for “resource-constrained” settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting. BioMed Central 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4265527/ /pubmed/25466570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-66 Text en © Kriza et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Kriza, Christine Hanass-Hancock, Jill Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah Deghaye, Nicola Aman, Rashid Wahlster, Philip Marin, Mayra Gebe, Nicodemus Akhwale, Willis Wachsmuth, Isabelle Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications |
title | A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications |
title_full | A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications |
title_short | A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications |
title_sort | systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-saharan africa: methodological issues and implications |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-66 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krizachristine asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT hanasshancockjill asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT odameemmanuelankrah asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT deghayenicola asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT amanrashid asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT wahlsterphilip asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT marinmayra asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT gebenicodemus asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT akhwalewillis asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT wachsmuthisabelle asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT kolominskyrabaspeterl asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT krizachristine systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT hanasshancockjill systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT odameemmanuelankrah systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT deghayenicola systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT amanrashid systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT wahlsterphilip systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT marinmayra systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT gebenicodemus systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT akhwalewillis systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT wachsmuthisabelle systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications AT kolominskyrabaspeterl systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications |