Cargando…

A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications

BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kriza, Christine, Hanass-Hancock, Jill, Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah, Deghaye, Nicola, Aman, Rashid, Wahlster, Philip, Marin, Mayra, Gebe, Nicodemus, Akhwale, Willis, Wachsmuth, Isabelle, Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-66
_version_ 1782348908304793600
author Kriza, Christine
Hanass-Hancock, Jill
Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah
Deghaye, Nicola
Aman, Rashid
Wahlster, Philip
Marin, Mayra
Gebe, Nicodemus
Akhwale, Willis
Wachsmuth, Isabelle
Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L
author_facet Kriza, Christine
Hanass-Hancock, Jill
Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah
Deghaye, Nicola
Aman, Rashid
Wahlster, Philip
Marin, Mayra
Gebe, Nicodemus
Akhwale, Willis
Wachsmuth, Isabelle
Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L
author_sort Kriza, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for “resource-poor” settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for “resource-limited” settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria. RESULTS: Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate HTA tool for “resource-constrained” settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42655272014-12-15 A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications Kriza, Christine Hanass-Hancock, Jill Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah Deghaye, Nicola Aman, Rashid Wahlster, Philip Marin, Mayra Gebe, Nicodemus Akhwale, Willis Wachsmuth, Isabelle Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for “resource-poor” settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for “resource-limited” settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria. RESULTS: Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate HTA tool for “resource-constrained” settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting. BioMed Central 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4265527/ /pubmed/25466570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-66 Text en © Kriza et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Kriza, Christine
Hanass-Hancock, Jill
Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah
Deghaye, Nicola
Aman, Rashid
Wahlster, Philip
Marin, Mayra
Gebe, Nicodemus
Akhwale, Willis
Wachsmuth, Isabelle
Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L
A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
title A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
title_full A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
title_fullStr A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
title_short A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
title_sort systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-saharan africa: methodological issues and implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-66
work_keys_str_mv AT krizachristine asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT hanasshancockjill asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT odameemmanuelankrah asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT deghayenicola asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT amanrashid asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT wahlsterphilip asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT marinmayra asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT gebenicodemus asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT akhwalewillis asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT wachsmuthisabelle asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT kolominskyrabaspeterl asystematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT krizachristine systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT hanasshancockjill systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT odameemmanuelankrah systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT deghayenicola systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT amanrashid systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT wahlsterphilip systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT marinmayra systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT gebenicodemus systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT akhwalewillis systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT wachsmuthisabelle systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications
AT kolominskyrabaspeterl systematicreviewofhealthtechnologyassessmenttoolsinsubsaharanafricamethodologicalissuesandimplications