Cargando…

Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles

Purpose. In the present study we want to propose a classification system to quantify cystoceles by perineal ultrasound (PUS). Materials and Methods. 120 PUS data were analyzed measuring the distance between the lowest point of the bladder and the midpubic line (MPL) during rest and Valsalva. Results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najjari, Laila, Hennemann, Julia, Larscheid, Pia, Papathemelis, Thomas, Maass, Nicolai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/740925
_version_ 1782348913665114112
author Najjari, Laila
Hennemann, Julia
Larscheid, Pia
Papathemelis, Thomas
Maass, Nicolai
author_facet Najjari, Laila
Hennemann, Julia
Larscheid, Pia
Papathemelis, Thomas
Maass, Nicolai
author_sort Najjari, Laila
collection PubMed
description Purpose. In the present study we want to propose a classification system to quantify cystoceles by perineal ultrasound (PUS). Materials and Methods. 120 PUS data were analyzed measuring the distance between the lowest point of the bladder and the midpubic line (MPL) during rest and Valsalva. Results were classified into groups and compared to POP-Q using the κ-coefficient. Results for exact bladder position were checked for interrater reliability using ICC and Pearson's coefficient and results for classification were checked using the κ-coefficient. Bladder positions at rest and Valsalva were correlated with the distance between these points. Results. Highly significant differences concerning the position at rest and the distance between rest and Valsalva were found between the groups. For the interrater agreement, the Pearson correlation coefficient was ρ = 0.98, the ICC (A-1) = 0.98, and κ = 1.00. Comparing the classification results for POP-Q and PUS, the kappa-coefficient was κ = 0.65. Conclusion. PUS using the MPL and the classification system is a highly reliable tool for the evaluation of cystoceles. PUS shows good correlation with POP-Q. Furthermore, PUS offers a doubtless identification of the descending organ. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical use of the classification system proposed here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42655512014-12-18 Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles Najjari, Laila Hennemann, Julia Larscheid, Pia Papathemelis, Thomas Maass, Nicolai Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Purpose. In the present study we want to propose a classification system to quantify cystoceles by perineal ultrasound (PUS). Materials and Methods. 120 PUS data were analyzed measuring the distance between the lowest point of the bladder and the midpubic line (MPL) during rest and Valsalva. Results were classified into groups and compared to POP-Q using the κ-coefficient. Results for exact bladder position were checked for interrater reliability using ICC and Pearson's coefficient and results for classification were checked using the κ-coefficient. Bladder positions at rest and Valsalva were correlated with the distance between these points. Results. Highly significant differences concerning the position at rest and the distance between rest and Valsalva were found between the groups. For the interrater agreement, the Pearson correlation coefficient was ρ = 0.98, the ICC (A-1) = 0.98, and κ = 1.00. Comparing the classification results for POP-Q and PUS, the kappa-coefficient was κ = 0.65. Conclusion. PUS using the MPL and the classification system is a highly reliable tool for the evaluation of cystoceles. PUS shows good correlation with POP-Q. Furthermore, PUS offers a doubtless identification of the descending organ. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical use of the classification system proposed here. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4265551/ /pubmed/25525602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/740925 Text en Copyright © 2014 Laila Najjari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Najjari, Laila
Hennemann, Julia
Larscheid, Pia
Papathemelis, Thomas
Maass, Nicolai
Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles
title Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles
title_full Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles
title_fullStr Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles
title_full_unstemmed Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles
title_short Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles
title_sort perineal ultrasound as a complement to pop-q in the assessment of cystoceles
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/740925
work_keys_str_mv AT najjarilaila perinealultrasoundasacomplementtopopqintheassessmentofcystoceles
AT hennemannjulia perinealultrasoundasacomplementtopopqintheassessmentofcystoceles
AT larscheidpia perinealultrasoundasacomplementtopopqintheassessmentofcystoceles
AT papathemelisthomas perinealultrasoundasacomplementtopopqintheassessmentofcystoceles
AT maassnicolai perinealultrasoundasacomplementtopopqintheassessmentofcystoceles