Cargando…

Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial

PURPOSE: Urodynamic studies are commonly performed as part of the preoperative work-up of patients undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to assess the extent to which these urodynamic parameters influence patient selection and postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Abhinav, Rathi, Sudheer, Patnaik, Pranab, Shaw, Dipak, Jain, Madhu, Trivedi, Sameer, Dwivedi, Udai Shankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.821
_version_ 1782348928250806272
author Agarwal, Abhinav
Rathi, Sudheer
Patnaik, Pranab
Shaw, Dipak
Jain, Madhu
Trivedi, Sameer
Dwivedi, Udai Shankar
author_facet Agarwal, Abhinav
Rathi, Sudheer
Patnaik, Pranab
Shaw, Dipak
Jain, Madhu
Trivedi, Sameer
Dwivedi, Udai Shankar
author_sort Agarwal, Abhinav
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Urodynamic studies are commonly performed as part of the preoperative work-up of patients undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to assess the extent to which these urodynamic parameters influence patient selection and postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with SUI were randomly assigned to two groups: one undergoing office evaluation only and the other with a preoperative urodynamic work-up. Patients with unfavorable urodynamic parameters (detrusor overactivity [DO] and/or Valsalva leak point pressure [VLPP]<60 cm H(2)O and/or maximum urethral closure pressure [MUCP]<20 cm H(2)O) were excluded from the urodynamic testing group. All patients in both groups underwent the transobturator midurethral sling procedure. Evaluation for treatment success (reductions in urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire scoring along with absent positive stress test) was done at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were evaluated. After 12 patients with any one or more of the abnormal urodynamic parameters were excluded, 30 patients were finally recruited in each of the "urodynamic testing" and "office evaluation only" groups. At both the 6- and the 12-month follow-ups, treatment outcomes (reduction in scores and positive provocative stress test) were significantly better in the urodynamic testing group than in the office evaluation only group (p-values significant for all outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed statistically significantly better treatment outcomes in the urodynamic group (after excluding those with poor prognostic indicators such as DO, low VLPP, and MUCP) than in the office evaluation only group. We recommend exploiting the prognostic value of these urodynamic parameters for patient counseling and treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42657172014-12-15 Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial Agarwal, Abhinav Rathi, Sudheer Patnaik, Pranab Shaw, Dipak Jain, Madhu Trivedi, Sameer Dwivedi, Udai Shankar Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Urodynamic studies are commonly performed as part of the preoperative work-up of patients undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to assess the extent to which these urodynamic parameters influence patient selection and postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with SUI were randomly assigned to two groups: one undergoing office evaluation only and the other with a preoperative urodynamic work-up. Patients with unfavorable urodynamic parameters (detrusor overactivity [DO] and/or Valsalva leak point pressure [VLPP]<60 cm H(2)O and/or maximum urethral closure pressure [MUCP]<20 cm H(2)O) were excluded from the urodynamic testing group. All patients in both groups underwent the transobturator midurethral sling procedure. Evaluation for treatment success (reductions in urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire scoring along with absent positive stress test) was done at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were evaluated. After 12 patients with any one or more of the abnormal urodynamic parameters were excluded, 30 patients were finally recruited in each of the "urodynamic testing" and "office evaluation only" groups. At both the 6- and the 12-month follow-ups, treatment outcomes (reduction in scores and positive provocative stress test) were significantly better in the urodynamic testing group than in the office evaluation only group (p-values significant for all outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed statistically significantly better treatment outcomes in the urodynamic group (after excluding those with poor prognostic indicators such as DO, low VLPP, and MUCP) than in the office evaluation only group. We recommend exploiting the prognostic value of these urodynamic parameters for patient counseling and treatment decisions. The Korean Urological Association 2014-12 2014-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4265717/ /pubmed/25512817 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.821 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agarwal, Abhinav
Rathi, Sudheer
Patnaik, Pranab
Shaw, Dipak
Jain, Madhu
Trivedi, Sameer
Dwivedi, Udai Shankar
Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial
title Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short Does Preoperative Urodynamic Testing Improve Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the Transobturator Tape Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort does preoperative urodynamic testing improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing the transobturator tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence? a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.821
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalabhinav doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT rathisudheer doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT patnaikpranab doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT shawdipak doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT jainmadhu doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT trivedisameer doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT dwivediudaishankar doespreoperativeurodynamictestingimprovesurgicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingthetransobturatortapeprocedureforstressurinaryincontinenceaprospectiverandomizedtrial