Cargando…

Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal pain- particularly back pain - is an important individual and socioeconomic problem. The Back College for the insurance holders of the Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW) is based on a multimoda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Peter, Pietsch, Aki, Harling, Melanie, Behl-Schön, Susanne, Nienhaus, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0032-7
_version_ 1782348952385880064
author Koch, Peter
Pietsch, Aki
Harling, Melanie
Behl-Schön, Susanne
Nienhaus, Albert
author_facet Koch, Peter
Pietsch, Aki
Harling, Melanie
Behl-Schön, Susanne
Nienhaus, Albert
author_sort Koch, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal pain- particularly back pain - is an important individual and socioeconomic problem. The Back College for the insurance holders of the Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW) is based on a multimodal concept and has been evaluated with respect to pain relief and continuing in the nursing profession. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, the participants in the Back College from 2009 to 2011 were surveyed in writing. Besides demographic data, the survey covered information on qualification, length of employment, institution, employment status, periods of inability to work, applicability of working techniques and continuation in the profession. Back pain was recorded at three time points - T1 (before the Back College), T2 (directly after the Back College) and T3 (at the time of the survey). Pain changes were submitted to tests for paired samples. Multivariate logistic analysis was applied to determine potential factors influencing unfavourable changes in pain or leaving nursing due to back pain. RESULTS: The survey covered 1,282 insurance holders, with a response rate of 80%. Statistically significant reductions in pain were found for the whole group and for all subgroups. For persons who predominantly worked in old people’s homes and who did not take part in refresher services, an increased odds ratio was found for unfavourable changes in pain (OR: 1.9 or 1.4, respectively). Persons with a qualification in geriatric nursing or in intensive care/OP/anaesthesia had an increased risk of leaving nursing due to back pain (OR: 2.5 in each case). An increased risk of leaving was also found for persons who did not take part in workplace support (OR: 2.9). CONCLUSION: Within the context of the study design, the multimodal concept of the Back College is clearly related to relief of back pain. The Back College appears to be less successful for geriatric nurses and persons with qualifications in intensive care/OP/anaesthesia. Further studies are needed to ascertain why some participants experience less relief in stress from the working techniques they have learnt.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42658902014-12-16 Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff Koch, Peter Pietsch, Aki Harling, Melanie Behl-Schön, Susanne Nienhaus, Albert J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal pain- particularly back pain - is an important individual and socioeconomic problem. The Back College for the insurance holders of the Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW) is based on a multimodal concept and has been evaluated with respect to pain relief and continuing in the nursing profession. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, the participants in the Back College from 2009 to 2011 were surveyed in writing. Besides demographic data, the survey covered information on qualification, length of employment, institution, employment status, periods of inability to work, applicability of working techniques and continuation in the profession. Back pain was recorded at three time points - T1 (before the Back College), T2 (directly after the Back College) and T3 (at the time of the survey). Pain changes were submitted to tests for paired samples. Multivariate logistic analysis was applied to determine potential factors influencing unfavourable changes in pain or leaving nursing due to back pain. RESULTS: The survey covered 1,282 insurance holders, with a response rate of 80%. Statistically significant reductions in pain were found for the whole group and for all subgroups. For persons who predominantly worked in old people’s homes and who did not take part in refresher services, an increased odds ratio was found for unfavourable changes in pain (OR: 1.9 or 1.4, respectively). Persons with a qualification in geriatric nursing or in intensive care/OP/anaesthesia had an increased risk of leaving nursing due to back pain (OR: 2.5 in each case). An increased risk of leaving was also found for persons who did not take part in workplace support (OR: 2.9). CONCLUSION: Within the context of the study design, the multimodal concept of the Back College is clearly related to relief of back pain. The Back College appears to be less successful for geriatric nurses and persons with qualifications in intensive care/OP/anaesthesia. Further studies are needed to ascertain why some participants experience less relief in stress from the working techniques they have learnt. BioMed Central 2014-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4265890/ /pubmed/25512761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0032-7 Text en Copyright © 2014 Koch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Koch, Peter
Pietsch, Aki
Harling, Melanie
Behl-Schön, Susanne
Nienhaus, Albert
Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff
title Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff
title_full Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff
title_short Evaluation of the Back College for nursing staff
title_sort evaluation of the back college for nursing staff
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-014-0032-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kochpeter evaluationofthebackcollegefornursingstaff
AT pietschaki evaluationofthebackcollegefornursingstaff
AT harlingmelanie evaluationofthebackcollegefornursingstaff
AT behlschonsusanne evaluationofthebackcollegefornursingstaff
AT nienhausalbert evaluationofthebackcollegefornursingstaff