Cargando…

In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions

BACKGROUND: Phase-shift nanoemulsions (PSNEs) provide cavitation sites when the perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanodroplets (ND) are vaporized to microbubbles by acoustic energy. Their presence lowers the power required to ablate tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), potentially making it a saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puett, Connor, Phillips, Linsey C, Sheeran, Paul S, Dayton, Paul A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-5736-1-16
_version_ 1782348954534412288
author Puett, Connor
Phillips, Linsey C
Sheeran, Paul S
Dayton, Paul A
author_facet Puett, Connor
Phillips, Linsey C
Sheeran, Paul S
Dayton, Paul A
author_sort Puett, Connor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phase-shift nanoemulsions (PSNEs) provide cavitation sites when the perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanodroplets (ND) are vaporized to microbubbles by acoustic energy. Their presence lowers the power required to ablate tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), potentially making it a safer option for a broader range of treatment sites. However, spatial control over the ablation region can be problematic when cavitation is used to enhance heating. This study explored relationships between vaporization, ablation, and the PSNE concentration in vitro to optimize the acoustic intensity and insonation time required for spatially controlled ablation enhancement using a PSNE that included a volatile PFC component. METHODS: HIFU (continuous wave at 1 MHz; insonation times of 5, 10, 15, and 20 s; cool-down times of 2, 4, and 6 s; peak negative pressures of 2, 3, and 4 MPa) was applied to albumin-acrylamide gels containing PFC agents (1:1 mix of volatile decafluorobutane and more stable dodecafluoropentane at 10(5) to 10(8) PFC ND per milliliter) or agent-free controls. Vaporization fields (microbubble clouds) were imaged by conventional ultrasound, and ablation lesions were measured directly by calipers. Controlled ablation was defined as the production of ‘cigar’-shaped lesions corresponding with the acoustic focal zone. This control was considered to be lost when ablation occurred in prefocal vaporization fields having a predominantly ‘tadpole’ or oblong shape. RESULTS: Changes in the vaporization field shape and location occurred on a continuum with increasing PSNE concentration and acoustic intensity. Working with the maximum concentration-intensity combinations resulting in controlled ablation demonstrated a dose-responsive relationship between insonation time and volumes of both the vaporization fields (approximately 20 to 240 mm(3)) and the ablation lesions (1 to 135 mm(3)) within them. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU ablation was enhanced by this PSNE and could be achieved using intensities ≤650 W/cm(2). Although the ablation lesions were located within much larger microbubble clouds, optimum insonation times and intensities could be selected to achieve an ablation lesion of desired size and location for a given PSNE concentration. This demonstration of controllable enhancement using a PSNE that contained a volatile PFC component is another step toward developing phase-shift nanotechnology as a potential clinical tool to improve HIFU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4265949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42659492014-12-16 In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions Puett, Connor Phillips, Linsey C Sheeran, Paul S Dayton, Paul A J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Phase-shift nanoemulsions (PSNEs) provide cavitation sites when the perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanodroplets (ND) are vaporized to microbubbles by acoustic energy. Their presence lowers the power required to ablate tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), potentially making it a safer option for a broader range of treatment sites. However, spatial control over the ablation region can be problematic when cavitation is used to enhance heating. This study explored relationships between vaporization, ablation, and the PSNE concentration in vitro to optimize the acoustic intensity and insonation time required for spatially controlled ablation enhancement using a PSNE that included a volatile PFC component. METHODS: HIFU (continuous wave at 1 MHz; insonation times of 5, 10, 15, and 20 s; cool-down times of 2, 4, and 6 s; peak negative pressures of 2, 3, and 4 MPa) was applied to albumin-acrylamide gels containing PFC agents (1:1 mix of volatile decafluorobutane and more stable dodecafluoropentane at 10(5) to 10(8) PFC ND per milliliter) or agent-free controls. Vaporization fields (microbubble clouds) were imaged by conventional ultrasound, and ablation lesions were measured directly by calipers. Controlled ablation was defined as the production of ‘cigar’-shaped lesions corresponding with the acoustic focal zone. This control was considered to be lost when ablation occurred in prefocal vaporization fields having a predominantly ‘tadpole’ or oblong shape. RESULTS: Changes in the vaporization field shape and location occurred on a continuum with increasing PSNE concentration and acoustic intensity. Working with the maximum concentration-intensity combinations resulting in controlled ablation demonstrated a dose-responsive relationship between insonation time and volumes of both the vaporization fields (approximately 20 to 240 mm(3)) and the ablation lesions (1 to 135 mm(3)) within them. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU ablation was enhanced by this PSNE and could be achieved using intensities ≤650 W/cm(2). Although the ablation lesions were located within much larger microbubble clouds, optimum insonation times and intensities could be selected to achieve an ablation lesion of desired size and location for a given PSNE concentration. This demonstration of controllable enhancement using a PSNE that contained a volatile PFC component is another step toward developing phase-shift nanotechnology as a potential clinical tool to improve HIFU. BioMed Central 2013-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4265949/ /pubmed/25512861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-5736-1-16 Text en Copyright © 2013 Puett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Puett, Connor
Phillips, Linsey C
Sheeran, Paul S
Dayton, Paul A
In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
title In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
title_full In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
title_fullStr In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
title_full_unstemmed In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
title_short In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
title_sort in vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-5736-1-16
work_keys_str_mv AT puettconnor invitroparameteroptimizationforspatialcontroloffocusedultrasoundablationwhenusinglowboilingpointphasechangenanoemulsions
AT phillipslinseyc invitroparameteroptimizationforspatialcontroloffocusedultrasoundablationwhenusinglowboilingpointphasechangenanoemulsions
AT sheeranpauls invitroparameteroptimizationforspatialcontroloffocusedultrasoundablationwhenusinglowboilingpointphasechangenanoemulsions
AT daytonpaula invitroparameteroptimizationforspatialcontroloffocusedultrasoundablationwhenusinglowboilingpointphasechangenanoemulsions