Cargando…

Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study

Objective To assess the accuracy of surgeons and anaesthetists in predicting the time it will take them to complete an operation or procedure and therefore explain some of the difficulties encountered in operating theatre scheduling. Design Single centre, prospective observational study. Setting Pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Travis, Elizabeth, Woodhouse, Sarah, Tan, Ruth, Patel, Sandeep, Donovan, Jason, Brogan, Kit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25510241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7182
_version_ 1782348968623079424
author Travis, Elizabeth
Woodhouse, Sarah
Tan, Ruth
Patel, Sandeep
Donovan, Jason
Brogan, Kit
author_facet Travis, Elizabeth
Woodhouse, Sarah
Tan, Ruth
Patel, Sandeep
Donovan, Jason
Brogan, Kit
author_sort Travis, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the accuracy of surgeons and anaesthetists in predicting the time it will take them to complete an operation or procedure and therefore explain some of the difficulties encountered in operating theatre scheduling. Design Single centre, prospective observational study. Setting Plastic, orthopaedic, and general surgical operating theatres at a level 1 trauma centre serving a population of about 370 000. Participants 92 operating theatre staff including surgical consultants, surgical registrars, anaesthetic consultants, and anaesthetic registrars. Intervention Participants were asked how long they thought their procedure would take. These data were compared with actual time data recorded at the end of the case. Primary outcome measure Absolute difference between predicted and actual time. Results General surgeons underestimated the time required for the procedure by 31 minutes (95% confidence interval 7.6 to 54.4), meaning that procedures took, on average, 28.7% longer than predicted. Plastic surgeons underestimated by 5 minutes (−12.4 to 22.4), with procedures taking an average of 4.5% longer than predicted. Orthopaedic surgeons overestimated by 1 minute (−16.4 to 14.0), with procedures taking an average of 1.1% less time than predicted. Anaesthetists underestimated by 35 minutes (21.7 to 48.7), meaning that, on average, procedures took 167.5% longer than they predicted. The four specialty mean time overestimations or underestimations are significantly different from each other (P=0.01). The observed time differences between anaesthetists and both orthopaedic and plastic surgeons are significantly different (P<0.05), but the time difference between anaesthetists and general surgeons is not significantly different. Conclusion The inability of clinicians to predict the necessary time for a procedure is a significant cause of delay in the operating theatre. This study suggests that anaesthetists are the most inaccurate and highlights the potential differences between specialties in what is considered part of the “anaesthesia time.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42660342014-12-16 Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study Travis, Elizabeth Woodhouse, Sarah Tan, Ruth Patel, Sandeep Donovan, Jason Brogan, Kit BMJ Research Objective To assess the accuracy of surgeons and anaesthetists in predicting the time it will take them to complete an operation or procedure and therefore explain some of the difficulties encountered in operating theatre scheduling. Design Single centre, prospective observational study. Setting Plastic, orthopaedic, and general surgical operating theatres at a level 1 trauma centre serving a population of about 370 000. Participants 92 operating theatre staff including surgical consultants, surgical registrars, anaesthetic consultants, and anaesthetic registrars. Intervention Participants were asked how long they thought their procedure would take. These data were compared with actual time data recorded at the end of the case. Primary outcome measure Absolute difference between predicted and actual time. Results General surgeons underestimated the time required for the procedure by 31 minutes (95% confidence interval 7.6 to 54.4), meaning that procedures took, on average, 28.7% longer than predicted. Plastic surgeons underestimated by 5 minutes (−12.4 to 22.4), with procedures taking an average of 4.5% longer than predicted. Orthopaedic surgeons overestimated by 1 minute (−16.4 to 14.0), with procedures taking an average of 1.1% less time than predicted. Anaesthetists underestimated by 35 minutes (21.7 to 48.7), meaning that, on average, procedures took 167.5% longer than they predicted. The four specialty mean time overestimations or underestimations are significantly different from each other (P=0.01). The observed time differences between anaesthetists and both orthopaedic and plastic surgeons are significantly different (P<0.05), but the time difference between anaesthetists and general surgeons is not significantly different. Conclusion The inability of clinicians to predict the necessary time for a procedure is a significant cause of delay in the operating theatre. This study suggests that anaesthetists are the most inaccurate and highlights the potential differences between specialties in what is considered part of the “anaesthesia time.” BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4266034/ /pubmed/25510241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7182 Text en © Travis et al 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Travis, Elizabeth
Woodhouse, Sarah
Tan, Ruth
Patel, Sandeep
Donovan, Jason
Brogan, Kit
Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study
title Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study
title_full Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study
title_fullStr Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study
title_short Operating theatre time, where does it all go? A prospective observational study
title_sort operating theatre time, where does it all go? a prospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25510241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7182
work_keys_str_mv AT traviselizabeth operatingtheatretimewheredoesitallgoaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT woodhousesarah operatingtheatretimewheredoesitallgoaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT tanruth operatingtheatretimewheredoesitallgoaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT patelsandeep operatingtheatretimewheredoesitallgoaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT donovanjason operatingtheatretimewheredoesitallgoaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT brogankit operatingtheatretimewheredoesitallgoaprospectiveobservationalstudy