Cargando…
Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and “phantom stimulation”, where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.932024 |
_version_ | 1782348972927483904 |
---|---|
author | Carlyon, Robert P. Monstrey, Jolijn Deeks, John M. Macherey, Olivier |
author_facet | Carlyon, Robert P. Monstrey, Jolijn Deeks, John M. Macherey, Olivier |
author_sort | Carlyon, Robert P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and “phantom stimulation”, where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-cochlear electrode. This strategy is expected to provide more selective excitation of the cochlear apex, compared to a standard strategy where the lowest-frequency channel is conveyed by symmetric pulses in monopolar mode. In both strategies all other channels were conveyed by monopolar stimulation. DESIGN: Within-subjects comparison between the two strategies. Four experiments: (1) discrimination between the strategies, controlling for loudness differences, (2) consonant identification, (3) recognition of lowpass-filtered sentences in quiet, (4) sentence recognition in the presence of a competing speaker. STUDY SAMPLE: Eight users of the Advanced Bionics CII/Hi-Res 90k cochlear implant. RESULTS: Listeners could easily discriminate between the two strategies but no consistent differences in performance were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method does not improve speech perception, at least in the short term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4266076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42660762014-12-29 Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses Carlyon, Robert P. Monstrey, Jolijn Deeks, John M. Macherey, Olivier Int J Audiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and “phantom stimulation”, where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-cochlear electrode. This strategy is expected to provide more selective excitation of the cochlear apex, compared to a standard strategy where the lowest-frequency channel is conveyed by symmetric pulses in monopolar mode. In both strategies all other channels were conveyed by monopolar stimulation. DESIGN: Within-subjects comparison between the two strategies. Four experiments: (1) discrimination between the strategies, controlling for loudness differences, (2) consonant identification, (3) recognition of lowpass-filtered sentences in quiet, (4) sentence recognition in the presence of a competing speaker. STUDY SAMPLE: Eight users of the Advanced Bionics CII/Hi-Res 90k cochlear implant. RESULTS: Listeners could easily discriminate between the two strategies but no consistent differences in performance were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method does not improve speech perception, at least in the short term. Informa Healthcare 2014-12 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4266076/ /pubmed/25358027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.932024 Text en © 2014 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Carlyon, Robert P. Monstrey, Jolijn Deeks, John M. Macherey, Olivier Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
title | Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
title_full | Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
title_short | Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
title_sort | evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.932024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlyonrobertp evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses AT monstreyjolijn evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses AT deeksjohnm evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses AT machereyolivier evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses |