Cargando…

Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and “phantom stimulation”, where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlyon, Robert P., Monstrey, Jolijn, Deeks, John M., Macherey, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.932024
_version_ 1782348972927483904
author Carlyon, Robert P.
Monstrey, Jolijn
Deeks, John M.
Macherey, Olivier
author_facet Carlyon, Robert P.
Monstrey, Jolijn
Deeks, John M.
Macherey, Olivier
author_sort Carlyon, Robert P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and “phantom stimulation”, where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-cochlear electrode. This strategy is expected to provide more selective excitation of the cochlear apex, compared to a standard strategy where the lowest-frequency channel is conveyed by symmetric pulses in monopolar mode. In both strategies all other channels were conveyed by monopolar stimulation. DESIGN: Within-subjects comparison between the two strategies. Four experiments: (1) discrimination between the strategies, controlling for loudness differences, (2) consonant identification, (3) recognition of lowpass-filtered sentences in quiet, (4) sentence recognition in the presence of a competing speaker. STUDY SAMPLE: Eight users of the Advanced Bionics CII/Hi-Res 90k cochlear implant. RESULTS: Listeners could easily discriminate between the two strategies but no consistent differences in performance were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method does not improve speech perception, at least in the short term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42660762014-12-29 Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses Carlyon, Robert P. Monstrey, Jolijn Deeks, John M. Macherey, Olivier Int J Audiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and “phantom stimulation”, where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-cochlear electrode. This strategy is expected to provide more selective excitation of the cochlear apex, compared to a standard strategy where the lowest-frequency channel is conveyed by symmetric pulses in monopolar mode. In both strategies all other channels were conveyed by monopolar stimulation. DESIGN: Within-subjects comparison between the two strategies. Four experiments: (1) discrimination between the strategies, controlling for loudness differences, (2) consonant identification, (3) recognition of lowpass-filtered sentences in quiet, (4) sentence recognition in the presence of a competing speaker. STUDY SAMPLE: Eight users of the Advanced Bionics CII/Hi-Res 90k cochlear implant. RESULTS: Listeners could easily discriminate between the two strategies but no consistent differences in performance were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method does not improve speech perception, at least in the short term. Informa Healthcare 2014-12 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4266076/ /pubmed/25358027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.932024 Text en © 2014 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Carlyon, Robert P.
Monstrey, Jolijn
Deeks, John M.
Macherey, Olivier
Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
title Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
title_full Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
title_fullStr Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
title_short Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
title_sort evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.932024
work_keys_str_mv AT carlyonrobertp evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses
AT monstreyjolijn evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses
AT deeksjohnm evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses
AT machereyolivier evaluationofacochlearimplantprocessingstrategyincorporatingphantomstimulationandasymmetricpulses