Cargando…

Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section

BACKGROUND: Open liver resection is the current standard of care for lesions in the right posterior liver section. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of robot-assisted liver resection for lesions located in segments 6 and 7 in comparison with open surgery. METHODS: Demographics,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patriti, Alberto, Cipriani, Federica, Ratti, Francesca, Bartoli, Alberto, Ceccarelli, Graziano, Casciola, Luciano, Aldrighetti, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25516700
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00040
_version_ 1782348992771784704
author Patriti, Alberto
Cipriani, Federica
Ratti, Francesca
Bartoli, Alberto
Ceccarelli, Graziano
Casciola, Luciano
Aldrighetti, Luca
author_facet Patriti, Alberto
Cipriani, Federica
Ratti, Francesca
Bartoli, Alberto
Ceccarelli, Graziano
Casciola, Luciano
Aldrighetti, Luca
author_sort Patriti, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open liver resection is the current standard of care for lesions in the right posterior liver section. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of robot-assisted liver resection for lesions located in segments 6 and 7 in comparison with open surgery. METHODS: Demographics, comorbidities, clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatments, and outcomes from patients who underwent open and robot-assisted liver resection at 2 centers for lesions in the right posterior section between January 2007 and June 2012 were reviewed. A 1:3 matched analysis was performed by individually matching patients in the robotic cohort to patients in the open cohort on the basis of demographics, comorbidities, performance status, tumor stage, and location. RESULTS: Matched patients undergoing robotic and open liver resections displayed no significant differences in postoperative outcomes as measured by blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, overall complication rate (15.8% vs 13%), R0 negative margin rate, and mortality. Patients undergoing robotic liver surgery had significantly longer operative time (mean, 303 vs 233 minutes) and inflow occlusion time (mean, 75 vs 29 minutes) compared with their open counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and open liver resections in the right posterior section display similar safety and feasibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42662232014-12-16 Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section Patriti, Alberto Cipriani, Federica Ratti, Francesca Bartoli, Alberto Ceccarelli, Graziano Casciola, Luciano Aldrighetti, Luca JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: Open liver resection is the current standard of care for lesions in the right posterior liver section. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of robot-assisted liver resection for lesions located in segments 6 and 7 in comparison with open surgery. METHODS: Demographics, comorbidities, clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatments, and outcomes from patients who underwent open and robot-assisted liver resection at 2 centers for lesions in the right posterior section between January 2007 and June 2012 were reviewed. A 1:3 matched analysis was performed by individually matching patients in the robotic cohort to patients in the open cohort on the basis of demographics, comorbidities, performance status, tumor stage, and location. RESULTS: Matched patients undergoing robotic and open liver resections displayed no significant differences in postoperative outcomes as measured by blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, overall complication rate (15.8% vs 13%), R0 negative margin rate, and mortality. Patients undergoing robotic liver surgery had significantly longer operative time (mean, 303 vs 233 minutes) and inflow occlusion time (mean, 75 vs 29 minutes) compared with their open counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and open liver resections in the right posterior section display similar safety and feasibility. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4266223/ /pubmed/25516700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00040 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Patriti, Alberto
Cipriani, Federica
Ratti, Francesca
Bartoli, Alberto
Ceccarelli, Graziano
Casciola, Luciano
Aldrighetti, Luca
Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section
title Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section
title_full Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section
title_fullStr Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section
title_short Robot-Assisted Versus Open Liver Resection in the Right Posterior Section
title_sort robot-assisted versus open liver resection in the right posterior section
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25516700
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00040
work_keys_str_mv AT patritialberto robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection
AT ciprianifederica robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection
AT rattifrancesca robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection
AT bartolialberto robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection
AT ceccarelligraziano robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection
AT casciolaluciano robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection
AT aldrighettiluca robotassistedversusopenliverresectionintherightposteriorsection