Cargando…

Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is still one of the major causes of severe maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, no guideline for PPH occurring in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands is available. A set of 25 quality indicators for prevention and management of PPH in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smit, Marrit, Chan, Kar-Li L, Middeldorp, Johanna M, van Roosmalen, Jos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0397-8
_version_ 1782348995639640064
author Smit, Marrit
Chan, Kar-Li L
Middeldorp, Johanna M
van Roosmalen, Jos
author_facet Smit, Marrit
Chan, Kar-Li L
Middeldorp, Johanna M
van Roosmalen, Jos
author_sort Smit, Marrit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is still one of the major causes of severe maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, no guideline for PPH occurring in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands is available. A set of 25 quality indicators for prevention and management of PPH in primary care has been developed by an expert panel consisting of midwives, obstetricians, ambulance personal and representatives of the Royal Dutch College of Midwives (KNOV) and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NVOG). This study aims to assess the performance of these quality indicators as an assessment tool for midwifery care and suitability for incorporation in a professional midwifery guideline. METHODS: From April 2008 to April 2010, midwives reported cases of PPH. Cases were assessed using the 25 earlier developed quality indicators. Quality criteria on applicability, feasibility, adherence to the indicator, and the indicator’s potential to monitor improvement were assessed. RESULTS: 98 cases of PPH were reported during the study period, of which 94 were analysed. Eleven indicators were found to be applicable and feasible. Five of these indicators showed improvement potential: routine administration of uterotonics, quantifying blood loss by weighing, timely referral to secondary care in homebirth and treatment of PPH using catherisation, uterine massage and oxytocin and the use of oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven out of 25 indicators were found to be suitable as an assessment tool for midwifery care of PPH and are therefore suitable for incorporation in a professional midwifery guideline. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42662352014-12-16 Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines Smit, Marrit Chan, Kar-Li L Middeldorp, Johanna M van Roosmalen, Jos BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is still one of the major causes of severe maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, no guideline for PPH occurring in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands is available. A set of 25 quality indicators for prevention and management of PPH in primary care has been developed by an expert panel consisting of midwives, obstetricians, ambulance personal and representatives of the Royal Dutch College of Midwives (KNOV) and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NVOG). This study aims to assess the performance of these quality indicators as an assessment tool for midwifery care and suitability for incorporation in a professional midwifery guideline. METHODS: From April 2008 to April 2010, midwives reported cases of PPH. Cases were assessed using the 25 earlier developed quality indicators. Quality criteria on applicability, feasibility, adherence to the indicator, and the indicator’s potential to monitor improvement were assessed. RESULTS: 98 cases of PPH were reported during the study period, of which 94 were analysed. Eleven indicators were found to be applicable and feasible. Five of these indicators showed improvement potential: routine administration of uterotonics, quantifying blood loss by weighing, timely referral to secondary care in homebirth and treatment of PPH using catherisation, uterine massage and oxytocin and the use of oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven out of 25 indicators were found to be suitable as an assessment tool for midwifery care of PPH and are therefore suitable for incorporation in a professional midwifery guideline. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these results. BioMed Central 2014-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4266235/ /pubmed/25481692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0397-8 Text en © Smit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smit, Marrit
Chan, Kar-Li L
Middeldorp, Johanna M
van Roosmalen, Jos
Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
title Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
title_full Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
title_fullStr Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
title_short Postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the Netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
title_sort postpartum haemorrhage in midwifery care in the netherlands: validation of quality indicators for midwifery guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0397-8
work_keys_str_mv AT smitmarrit postpartumhaemorrhageinmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsvalidationofqualityindicatorsformidwiferyguidelines
AT chankarlil postpartumhaemorrhageinmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsvalidationofqualityindicatorsformidwiferyguidelines
AT middeldorpjohannam postpartumhaemorrhageinmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsvalidationofqualityindicatorsformidwiferyguidelines
AT vanroosmalenjos postpartumhaemorrhageinmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsvalidationofqualityindicatorsformidwiferyguidelines