Cargando…
Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself
Classic psychology and economic studies argue that punishment is the standard response to violations of fairness norms. Typically, individuals are presented with the option to punish the transgressor or not. However, such a narrow choice set may fail to capture stronger alternative preferences for r...
Autores principales: | FeldmanHall, Oriel, Sokol-Hessner, Peter, Van Bavel, Jay J., Phelps, Elizabeth A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6306 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators
por: Mattan, Bradley D., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Why we don’t always punish: Preferences for non-punitive responses to moral violations
por: Heffner, Joseph, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions
por: Son, Jae-Young, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Dissociable contributions of the prefrontal cortex in group-based cooperation
por: Wills, Julian, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making
por: Cheng, Xuemei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)