Cargando…
A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers
BACKGROUND: Focusing on the respiratory function for health effect indices, we conducted a cross-sectional study on workers who did and did not handle toner to compare the longitudinal changes. METHODS: Among 116 individuals who worked for a Japanese business equipment manufacturer and participated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25516816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.001 |
_version_ | 1782349056246284288 |
---|---|
author | Yanagi, Nobuaki Kitamura, Hiroko Mizuno, Mitsuhito Hata, Koichi Uchiyama, Tetsuro Kuga, Hiroaki Matsushita, Tetsuhiro Kurosaki, Shizuka Uehara, Masamichi Ogami, Akira Higashi, Toshiaki |
author_facet | Yanagi, Nobuaki Kitamura, Hiroko Mizuno, Mitsuhito Hata, Koichi Uchiyama, Tetsuro Kuga, Hiroaki Matsushita, Tetsuhiro Kurosaki, Shizuka Uehara, Masamichi Ogami, Akira Higashi, Toshiaki |
author_sort | Yanagi, Nobuaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Focusing on the respiratory function for health effect indices, we conducted a cross-sectional study on workers who did and did not handle toner to compare the longitudinal changes. METHODS: Among 116 individuals who worked for a Japanese business equipment manufacturer and participated in the study, the analysis included 69 male workers who we were able to follow up for 4 years. We categorized the 40 workers engaged in toner-handling work as the exposed group and the 29 workers not engaged in these tasks as the referent group, and compared their respiratory function test results: peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), vital capacity (VC), predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of forced vital capacity (FEV(1)%). RESULTS: The cross-sectional study of the respiratory function test results at the baseline and at the 5(th) year showed no statistically significant differences in PEFR, VC, %VC, FEV(1), and FEV(1)% between the exposed and referent workers. Also, respiratory function time-course for 4 years was calculated and compared between the groups. No statistically significant differences were shown. CONCLUSION: Our study does not suggest any toner exposure effects on respiratory function. However, the number of subjects was small in our study; studies of larger populations will be desired in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4266780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42667802014-12-16 A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers Yanagi, Nobuaki Kitamura, Hiroko Mizuno, Mitsuhito Hata, Koichi Uchiyama, Tetsuro Kuga, Hiroaki Matsushita, Tetsuhiro Kurosaki, Shizuka Uehara, Masamichi Ogami, Akira Higashi, Toshiaki Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: Focusing on the respiratory function for health effect indices, we conducted a cross-sectional study on workers who did and did not handle toner to compare the longitudinal changes. METHODS: Among 116 individuals who worked for a Japanese business equipment manufacturer and participated in the study, the analysis included 69 male workers who we were able to follow up for 4 years. We categorized the 40 workers engaged in toner-handling work as the exposed group and the 29 workers not engaged in these tasks as the referent group, and compared their respiratory function test results: peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), vital capacity (VC), predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of forced vital capacity (FEV(1)%). RESULTS: The cross-sectional study of the respiratory function test results at the baseline and at the 5(th) year showed no statistically significant differences in PEFR, VC, %VC, FEV(1), and FEV(1)% between the exposed and referent workers. Also, respiratory function time-course for 4 years was calculated and compared between the groups. No statistically significant differences were shown. CONCLUSION: Our study does not suggest any toner exposure effects on respiratory function. However, the number of subjects was small in our study; studies of larger populations will be desired in the future. 2014-07-24 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4266780/ /pubmed/25516816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.001 Text en © 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yanagi, Nobuaki Kitamura, Hiroko Mizuno, Mitsuhito Hata, Koichi Uchiyama, Tetsuro Kuga, Hiroaki Matsushita, Tetsuhiro Kurosaki, Shizuka Uehara, Masamichi Ogami, Akira Higashi, Toshiaki A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers |
title | A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers |
title_full | A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers |
title_fullStr | A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers |
title_full_unstemmed | A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers |
title_short | A 4-Year Follow-up Cohort Study of the Respiratory Functions in Toner-handling Workers |
title_sort | 4-year follow-up cohort study of the respiratory functions in toner-handling workers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25516816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanaginobuaki a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT kitamurahiroko a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT mizunomitsuhito a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT hatakoichi a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT uchiyamatetsuro a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT kugahiroaki a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT matsushitatetsuhiro a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT kurosakishizuka a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT ueharamasamichi a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT ogamiakira a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT higashitoshiaki a4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT yanaginobuaki 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT kitamurahiroko 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT mizunomitsuhito 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT hatakoichi 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT uchiyamatetsuro 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT kugahiroaki 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT matsushitatetsuhiro 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT kurosakishizuka 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT ueharamasamichi 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT ogamiakira 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers AT higashitoshiaki 4yearfollowupcohortstudyoftherespiratoryfunctionsintonerhandlingworkers |