Cargando…
A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
BACKGROUND: This systematic literature review describes the potential public health impact of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults, using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. METHODS: Electronic database...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3 |
_version_ | 1782349070957805568 |
---|---|
author | Compernolle, Sofie De Cocker, Katrien Lakerveld, Jeroen Mackenbach, Joreintje D Nijpels, Giel Oppert, Jean-Michel Rutter, Harry Teixeira, Pedro J Cardon, Greet De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse |
author_facet | Compernolle, Sofie De Cocker, Katrien Lakerveld, Jeroen Mackenbach, Joreintje D Nijpels, Giel Oppert, Jean-Michel Rutter, Harry Teixeira, Pedro J Cardon, Greet De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse |
author_sort | Compernolle, Sofie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This systematic literature review describes the potential public health impact of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults, using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify intervention studies published between January 2000 and October 2013. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) the study included at least one outcome measure assessing obesity-related behaviours (i.e. diet, physical activity or sedentary behaviour), (2) the study collected data over at least one year and (3) the study’s intervention targeted adults, was conducted in a specified geographical area or worksite, and was multi-level (i.e. targeting both individual and environmental level). Evidence of RE-AIM of the selected interventions was assessed. Potential public health impact of an intervention was evaluated if information was provided on at least four of the five RE-AIM dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five multi-level interventions met the inclusion criteria. RE-AIM evaluation revealed that the included interventions generally had the potential to: reach a large number of people (on average 58% of the target population was aware of the intervention); achieve the assumed goals (89% found positive outcomes); be broadly adopted (the proportion of intervention deliverers varied from 9% to 92%) and be sustained (sixteen interventions were maintained). The highest potential public health impact was found in multi-level interventions that: 1) focused on all levels at the beginning of the planning process, 2) guided the implementation process using diffusion theory, and 3) used a website to disseminate the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies underreported results within the RE-AIM dimensions, the reported Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance were positively evaluated. However, more information on external validity and sustainability is needed in order to take informed decisions on the choice of interventions that should be implemented in real-world settings to accomplish long-term changes in obesity-related behaviours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4266878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42668782014-12-16 A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) Compernolle, Sofie De Cocker, Katrien Lakerveld, Jeroen Mackenbach, Joreintje D Nijpels, Giel Oppert, Jean-Michel Rutter, Harry Teixeira, Pedro J Cardon, Greet De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: This systematic literature review describes the potential public health impact of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults, using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify intervention studies published between January 2000 and October 2013. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) the study included at least one outcome measure assessing obesity-related behaviours (i.e. diet, physical activity or sedentary behaviour), (2) the study collected data over at least one year and (3) the study’s intervention targeted adults, was conducted in a specified geographical area or worksite, and was multi-level (i.e. targeting both individual and environmental level). Evidence of RE-AIM of the selected interventions was assessed. Potential public health impact of an intervention was evaluated if information was provided on at least four of the five RE-AIM dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five multi-level interventions met the inclusion criteria. RE-AIM evaluation revealed that the included interventions generally had the potential to: reach a large number of people (on average 58% of the target population was aware of the intervention); achieve the assumed goals (89% found positive outcomes); be broadly adopted (the proportion of intervention deliverers varied from 9% to 92%) and be sustained (sixteen interventions were maintained). The highest potential public health impact was found in multi-level interventions that: 1) focused on all levels at the beginning of the planning process, 2) guided the implementation process using diffusion theory, and 3) used a website to disseminate the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies underreported results within the RE-AIM dimensions, the reported Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance were positively evaluated. However, more information on external validity and sustainability is needed in order to take informed decisions on the choice of interventions that should be implemented in real-world settings to accomplish long-term changes in obesity-related behaviours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4266878/ /pubmed/25480391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3 Text en © Compernolle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Compernolle, Sofie De Cocker, Katrien Lakerveld, Jeroen Mackenbach, Joreintje D Nijpels, Giel Oppert, Jean-Michel Rutter, Harry Teixeira, Pedro J Cardon, Greet De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) |
title | A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) |
title_full | A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) |
title_fullStr | A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) |
title_full_unstemmed | A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) |
title_short | A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) |
title_sort | re-aim evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the spotlight project) |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT compernollesofie areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT decockerkatrien areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT lakerveldjeroen areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT mackenbachjoreintjed areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT nijpelsgiel areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT oppertjeanmichel areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT rutterharry areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT teixeirapedroj areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT cardongreet areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT debourdeaudhuijilse areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT compernollesofie reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT decockerkatrien reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT lakerveldjeroen reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT mackenbachjoreintjed reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT nijpelsgiel reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT oppertjeanmichel reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT rutterharry reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT teixeirapedroj reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT cardongreet reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject AT debourdeaudhuijilse reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject |