Cargando…

A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)

BACKGROUND: This systematic literature review describes the potential public health impact of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults, using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. METHODS: Electronic database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Compernolle, Sofie, De Cocker, Katrien, Lakerveld, Jeroen, Mackenbach, Joreintje D, Nijpels, Giel, Oppert, Jean-Michel, Rutter, Harry, Teixeira, Pedro J, Cardon, Greet, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3
_version_ 1782349070957805568
author Compernolle, Sofie
De Cocker, Katrien
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Mackenbach, Joreintje D
Nijpels, Giel
Oppert, Jean-Michel
Rutter, Harry
Teixeira, Pedro J
Cardon, Greet
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
author_facet Compernolle, Sofie
De Cocker, Katrien
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Mackenbach, Joreintje D
Nijpels, Giel
Oppert, Jean-Michel
Rutter, Harry
Teixeira, Pedro J
Cardon, Greet
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
author_sort Compernolle, Sofie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic literature review describes the potential public health impact of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults, using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify intervention studies published between January 2000 and October 2013. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) the study included at least one outcome measure assessing obesity-related behaviours (i.e. diet, physical activity or sedentary behaviour), (2) the study collected data over at least one year and (3) the study’s intervention targeted adults, was conducted in a specified geographical area or worksite, and was multi-level (i.e. targeting both individual and environmental level). Evidence of RE-AIM of the selected interventions was assessed. Potential public health impact of an intervention was evaluated if information was provided on at least four of the five RE-AIM dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five multi-level interventions met the inclusion criteria. RE-AIM evaluation revealed that the included interventions generally had the potential to: reach a large number of people (on average 58% of the target population was aware of the intervention); achieve the assumed goals (89% found positive outcomes); be broadly adopted (the proportion of intervention deliverers varied from 9% to 92%) and be sustained (sixteen interventions were maintained). The highest potential public health impact was found in multi-level interventions that: 1) focused on all levels at the beginning of the planning process, 2) guided the implementation process using diffusion theory, and 3) used a website to disseminate the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies underreported results within the RE-AIM dimensions, the reported Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance were positively evaluated. However, more information on external validity and sustainability is needed in order to take informed decisions on the choice of interventions that should be implemented in real-world settings to accomplish long-term changes in obesity-related behaviours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42668782014-12-16 A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project) Compernolle, Sofie De Cocker, Katrien Lakerveld, Jeroen Mackenbach, Joreintje D Nijpels, Giel Oppert, Jean-Michel Rutter, Harry Teixeira, Pedro J Cardon, Greet De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: This systematic literature review describes the potential public health impact of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults, using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify intervention studies published between January 2000 and October 2013. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) the study included at least one outcome measure assessing obesity-related behaviours (i.e. diet, physical activity or sedentary behaviour), (2) the study collected data over at least one year and (3) the study’s intervention targeted adults, was conducted in a specified geographical area or worksite, and was multi-level (i.e. targeting both individual and environmental level). Evidence of RE-AIM of the selected interventions was assessed. Potential public health impact of an intervention was evaluated if information was provided on at least four of the five RE-AIM dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five multi-level interventions met the inclusion criteria. RE-AIM evaluation revealed that the included interventions generally had the potential to: reach a large number of people (on average 58% of the target population was aware of the intervention); achieve the assumed goals (89% found positive outcomes); be broadly adopted (the proportion of intervention deliverers varied from 9% to 92%) and be sustained (sixteen interventions were maintained). The highest potential public health impact was found in multi-level interventions that: 1) focused on all levels at the beginning of the planning process, 2) guided the implementation process using diffusion theory, and 3) used a website to disseminate the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies underreported results within the RE-AIM dimensions, the reported Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance were positively evaluated. However, more information on external validity and sustainability is needed in order to take informed decisions on the choice of interventions that should be implemented in real-world settings to accomplish long-term changes in obesity-related behaviours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4266878/ /pubmed/25480391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3 Text en © Compernolle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Compernolle, Sofie
De Cocker, Katrien
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Mackenbach, Joreintje D
Nijpels, Giel
Oppert, Jean-Michel
Rutter, Harry
Teixeira, Pedro J
Cardon, Greet
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
title A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
title_full A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
title_fullStr A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
title_full_unstemmed A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
title_short A RE-AIM evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project)
title_sort re-aim evaluation of evidence-based multi-level interventions to improve obesity-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review (the spotlight project)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0147-3
work_keys_str_mv AT compernollesofie areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT decockerkatrien areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT lakerveldjeroen areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT mackenbachjoreintjed areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT nijpelsgiel areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT oppertjeanmichel areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT rutterharry areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT teixeirapedroj areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT cardongreet areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT debourdeaudhuijilse areaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT compernollesofie reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT decockerkatrien reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT lakerveldjeroen reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT mackenbachjoreintjed reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT nijpelsgiel reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT oppertjeanmichel reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT rutterharry reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT teixeirapedroj reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT cardongreet reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject
AT debourdeaudhuijilse reaimevaluationofevidencebasedmultilevelinterventionstoimproveobesityrelatedbehavioursinadultsasystematicreviewthespotlightproject